On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:13 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:08 PM Leigh Griffin <lgrif...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson < >> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>> > On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin >>> > <lgrif...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> > > Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for >>> > > those who haven't opted in >>> > >>> > I believe this is incorrect, it's now required for critical path >>> > packages. Otherwise it wouldn't be running at all, because I don't >>> > believe we've opted-in to anything. (If we had opted in, where would >>> we >>> > have configured that?) >>> >>> Yes, that is right. There is now project-wide gating on openQA tests >>> for critpath updates. >>> >> >> Ah today I learned something new! Apologies for misinformation. >> >>> > >>> > > > I should not receive any emails telling me that tests >>> > > > have failed unless some test has actually failed. >>> > > >>> > > Agreed, go ahead and file it as a bug on the Bodhi tracker and we >>> can >>> > > take a look at it >>> > >>> > I think we have a bug report already, actually, but I just don't know >>> > where it is. :/ I can report a new issue if nobody remembers where to >>> > find the existing one. >>> >>> I fixed the bug, months ago, when you first reported it: >>> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4221 >>> but the PR has not been merged, because Bodhi's CI is broken, and no- >>> one who has the power to merge the PR despite the CI failure has done >>> so. See: >>> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4221#issuecomment-860011362 >> >> >> I have tagged the blocking bug for my team to take a look at tomorrow, >> hopefully we can get these merged in. >> > > This has been an issue for me as well. I started work on trying to improve > the intelligence on triggering offline updates from PackageKit, but the PR > I submitted to propagate more data from Bodhi into updateinfo metadata > hasn't been merged despite being approved for months for similar reasons: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4214 > Thanks Neal, I added it to my list and have opened a dialog to get more insights into the current state of Bodhi. I'd like to understand why there is a bottleneck here from a merge permissions perspective. I will keep folks posted. > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Leigh Griffin Senior Engineering Manager Red Hat Waterford <https://www.redhat.com/> Communications House Cork Road, Waterford City lgrif...@redhat.com M: +353877545162 IM: lgriffin @redhatjobs <https://twitter.com/redhatjobs> redhatjobs <https://www.facebook.com/redhatjobs> @redhatjobs <https://instagram.com/redhatjobs> <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
