Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 05. 08. 21 v 2:42 Michel Alexandre Salim via devel napsal(a): This is now implemented on Rawhide; Fedora updates are in testing: Where is it documented? I suggest one of these https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/ https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ Miroslav ___

Re: Linux 5.13 To Allow Zstd Compressed Modules, Zstd Update Pending With Faster Performance

On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:46:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > LINUX KERNEL -- > > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel supports making use > > of Zstd compression, kernel modules moving forward can n

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > I think changing your key on the new accounts system should be enough. > If you've checked your ssh_config etc. and all of that is OK, I guess > you'll need to file a ticket with infra so they can look at why your new > key isn't working. Hi a

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210805.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210804.0): ID: 941380 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

[Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hello everyone, As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on 2021-08-10. I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] (along with devel subpackage) into rawhide. I would like your opinion/suggestion on: 1. Merging it and building it directly in rawhide.

[heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

Hi, the upcoming 3.41.2 release of the evolution-data-server next week will contain a soname version bump of a libcamel library due to ABI changes. A simple rebuild should be enough for the other packages. According to `dnf repoquery --whatrequires libcamel-1.2.so* --alldeps` there are the

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210805.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210804.0): ID: 941509 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 05. 08. 21 11:03, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hello everyone, As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on 2021-08-10. I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] (along with devel subpackage) into rawhide. I would like your opinion/suggestion on: 1. Me

Re: Linux 5.13 To Allow Zstd Compressed Modules, Zstd Update Pending With Faster Performance

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 08:19:43AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:46:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > > LINUX KERNEL -- > > > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel suppo

Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

Hello, here are the packages that should be retired according to the policy one week before the beta freeze, that is on 2021-08-17. If you see a pacakge that you would rather fix than retire, please assign the bugzilla (move it to ASSIGNED or higher) and start working on the fix. https://doc

Re: should leveldb have had an soname bump, and the associated notice?

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:22 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Kaleb Keithley: >> >> > ah, I missed that. I looked, but not hard enough apparently, and I >> presumed it was related >> > to changes in the code. >> > >> >

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > Hi, > the upcoming 3.41.2 release of the evolution-data-server next week > will > contain a soname version bump of a libcamel library due to ABI > changes. > A simple rebuild should be enough for the other packages. > > Acc

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210805.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210804.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210805.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 143 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.25 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 03:33:18PM +0800, Xiao Ni wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > I think changing your key on the new accounts system should be enough. > > If you've checked your ssh_config etc. and all of that is OK, I guess > > you'll need to file a ticket wit

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below. On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: >> Hi Zbyszek, >> >> thanks for your comment. Wouldn't it be much clearer instead of turning >> bind eye on the

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

I've taken and am fixing libprelude. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, August 5th, 2021 at 7:00 AM,

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > libpst Hi, I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python binary. Digging deeper, in the autoconf-archive-2021.02.19-2.fc35, the ax_python.m4 stil

Upcoming changes on datanomer/datagrepper

Hey folks, One of the initiatives the CPE team has taken over this quarter is updating and improving the performances of datagrepper/datanomer. That work is based upon the investigation done earlier in the year whose results can be found at: https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/datanommer_d

Fedora-Rawhide-20210805.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Clo

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > libpst > > Hi, > I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but > looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python > binary. D

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 17:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > libpst > > Hi, > I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but > looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python > binary. Digging deeper,

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below. > > On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > >> Hi Zbyszek, > >> > >> thanks for your

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

Current status: aqsis - Move to openexr2 bcd - Moved to openexr2 blender - seems to be failing for Python related issue calligra - Moved to openexr2, FTBFS for FontConfig reasons CTL - Moved to openexr2 darktable -done Field3D - done freeimage - done gegl04 - done gimp gmic - done gstreamer1-plugi

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 15:33:18 +0800, Xiao Ni wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > I think changing your key on the new accounts system should be enough. > > If you've checked your ssh_config etc. and all of that is OK, I guess > > you'll need to file a ticket with inf

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

On 05. 08. 21 19:01, Richard Shaw wrote: prusa-slicer - Expects openvdb to use IlmBase::Half That one should be fixed. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

This is just a note that luminance-hdr did move to openexr2, and will remain there for the foreseeable future—unless somebody writes a nontrivial patch for 3.x support, or the recently-absent upstream picks up development again. The curious may consult https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 08. 21 19:01, Richard Shaw wrote: > > prusa-slicer - Expects openvdb to use IlmBase::Half > > That one should be fixed. > Could very well be that my notes are stale. Lots of moving parts to this update :) Thanks, Richard _

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 18:39 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > libpst > > > > Hi, > > I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but > >

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 13:39 -0400 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 18:39 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > > > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > libpst > > > > > >    

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 17:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > libpst > > Hi, > I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, The package was orphaned yesterday as part of this progress. The former owner appears to also

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

On 8/5/21 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: >> Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below. >> >> On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200, Pe

Re: Font Awesome version 5

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:02 PM Jerry James wrote: > Wait .. there's a download at pypi.org? Why? > > Oh, to make it easier to integrate into django projects. Hmmm. Okay, > I'll check out that pypi.org tarball and think about this. Aleksei > suggested having a 5 somewhere in the name, since ver

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

Petr Menšík wrote: > No, that is the reason why I proposed it. Guidelines already state > *-filesystem packages does not have to be depended on [1]. Just one, > probably systemd or systemd-libs, should depend on it to get it > installed. All other can then just ignore the directory exactly as you >

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 05. 08. 21 19:01, Richard Shaw wrote: >> > prusa-slicer - Expects openvdb to use IlmBase::Half >> >> That one should be fixed. >> > > Could very well be that my notes are stale. Lots

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:20 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > The former owner appears to also be the upstream, so they might be > back, but at least in the meantime, do you want to take it now that > it's building again? Hi, I'm not sure I'm the best person, I do not follow the development

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 09:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I don't think autoconf-archive is usually actually used in builds, the > package sources generally contain the macros. Hi, that's why I mentioned the libpst runs autoreconf [1]. I can be wrong though, I thought the autoreconf upda