On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 17:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > libpst > > Hi, > I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but > looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python > binary. Digging deeper, in the autoconf-archive-2021.02.19-2.fc35, the > ax_python.m4 still references only up to version 3.9 (and there's no > `python` binary during the libpst build, because not installing also > python-unversioned-command). Note the libpst does run autoreconf. Maybe > more packages using autoconf are affected by this. > > Should anyone update the autoconf-archive and then rebuild the affected > packages? I cannot do it myself, I do not have enough powers.
I don't think autoconf-archive is usually actually used in builds, the package sources generally contain the macros. It looks like yselkowitz already patched Python 3.10 support into libpst's copies of the macros and rebuilt it just now: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1814151 -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
