No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210526.0):
ID: 896444 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
well,
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QBANCA2UAJ5ZSMDVVARLIYAJE66TYTCD/
suggesting to drop BIOS is a nonstarter.
much like Mr Jóhann B. Guðmundsson's argument that UEFI is on sale since 2005
, only 16 years.
A completely weightless argument
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210525.0):
ID: 896510 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/896510
ID: 896511 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qc
sounds unintuitive, but he just speaks truth to power:
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/352#comment-734630
"I think the GRUB stuff is so esoteric, so conditional and overly complicated,
that we shouldn't
explain it. Explaining it will take a lot of resources, and then it has to be
On 27.05.2021 11:49, e wrote:
"I think the GRUB stuff is so esoteric, so conditional and overly complicated,
that we shouldn't
explain it. Explaining it will take a lot of resources, and then it has to be
maintained or it
goes stale again. So when in doubt, just say no and don't document it"
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:49 AM e wrote:
>
> sounds unintuitive, but he just speaks truth to power:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/352#comment-734630
>
> "I think the GRUB stuff is so esoteric, so conditional and overly
> complicated, that we shouldn't
> explain it. Explaining
On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 11:49 +0200, e wrote:
> sounds unintuitive, but he just speaks truth to power:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/352#comment-734630
>
> "I think the GRUB stuff is so esoteric, so conditional and overly
> complicated, that we shouldn't
> explain it. Explainin
On 27.05.2021 12:13, Sérgio Basto wrote:
why systemd-boot is better ?
1. Not a bootloader.
2. Very simple and clean.
3. Starts Linux kernel directly with EFIStub without any bootloaders.
4. Can be used with XBOOTLDR[1] on any FS, supported by your hardware[2].
5. Has full BLS support.
Links:
[
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:27 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 27.05.2021 12:13, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > why systemd-boot is better ?
>
> 1. Not a bootloader.
> 2. Very simple and clean.
> 3. Starts Linux kernel directly with EFIStub without any bootloaders.
> 4. Can be used with XBOOTLDR[
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210525.1):
ID: 896778 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/896778
ID: 896781 Test: aarc
On 27.05.2021 12:30, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
Support for other OS for those who like/need to dualboot?
Yes. For example you can press "W" to start Windows directly.
Also native UEFI Boot allows multiple bootloaders.
Cutting date for hardware that supports it?
All hardware with UEFI support
On Thu, 27 May 2021 12:54:31 +0200 astoundingly, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> On 27.05.2021 12:30, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> > Support for other OS for those who like/need to dualboot?
>
> Yes. For example you can press "W" to start Windows directly.
>
> Also native UEFI Boot allows mul
Solomon Peachy wrote:
> If all you want to do is prevent CUPS from auto-discovering
> remote printers, edit /etc/cups/cupsd.conf and set 'Browsing Off'
"Browsing" is documented as "Specifies whether shared printers are
advertised". That sounds like printers on this host are advertised to
other ho
Hi all, I'm looking to shed some of the packages that I currently am the primary
contact for, due to lack of time to give them proper maintenance.
I'm happy to be left as a comaintainer and help out as able, but I'm looking to
hand off the primary point of contact.
- chicken (scheme interpreter)
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 7:02 AM e wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 12:54:31 +0200 astoundingly, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>
> > On 27.05.2021 12:30, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> > > Support for other OS for those who like/need to dualboot?
> >
> > Yes. For example you can press "W" to start
On 2021-05-27 14:52, Rick Elrod wrote:
- chicken (scheme interpreter)
If no one else has any objections, I will claim CHICKEN since I use and
need it for various things anyway.
- Jani Sinervo
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Rick,
Hau idatzi du Rick Elrod (codebl...@elrod.me) erabiltzaileak (2021
mai. 27, og. (13:53)):
> - httpie (http CLI client)
I can take this one, but I see Miro just? took ownership.
Miro, if you're interested add me, mikelo2, as co-maintainer. I can
take care of EPEL if needed.
Kind regards
On 27. 05. 21 14:39, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
Hi Rick,
Hau idatzi du Rick Elrod (codebl...@elrod.me) erabiltzaileak (2021
mai. 27, og. (13:53)):
- httpie (http CLI client)
I can take this one, but I see Miro just? took ownership.
Indeed.
Miro, if you're interested add me, mikelo2, as co-ma
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210526.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210527.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 139.21 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Just a quick reminder, this switch will be occurring in a little over
three weeks, so make sure to test your NPM packages with Node.js 16.x!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs16
>
> == Summary ==
> The latest release of Node.js to c
Am 30.06.20 um 15:34 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
Given Hans proposal [1] introduced systemd/grub2/Gnome upstream
changes it beg the question if now would not be the time to stop
supporting booting in legacy bios mode and move to uefi only supported
boot which has been available on any common
On 27.05.2021 16:17, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Also, a lot of laptops are installed in Legacy Mode, as setting them up
in EFI was impossible.
1. Backup all data.
2. Convert MBR to GPT.
3. Create an ESP partition, add it to the /etc/fstab file and mount.
4. sudo dnf swap grub2 grub2-efi
5. sudo dnf
On 5/27/21 5:25 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 27.05.2021 16:17, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Also, a lot of laptops are installed in Legacy Mode, as setting them
up in EFI was impossible.
1. Backup all data.
2. Convert MBR to GPT.
3. Create an ESP partition, add it to the /etc/fstab file an
On 5/27/21 10:45 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
That is quite a painful process. And how do you do that on a MBR system that
dual boots Fedora and Windows 10? I really don't want to go through the pain of
reinstalling Windows and all the programs that I have there.
There's no migration path that
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InstallGPTwithKickstart
== Summary ==
Add support for configuring GPT partition table in kickstart without
requiring a custom pre-installation script or a custom boot script.
[[Category:SystemWideChange]]
== Owners ==
* Name: [[User:Davdunc|David Duncan]],
On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 09:35 +, eedio wrote:
> well,
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QBANCA2UAJ5ZSMDVVARLIYAJE66TYTCD/
>
> suggesting to drop BIOS is a nonstarter.
This thread died over half a year ago (back in October of last year)
aft
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 16/194 (x86_64), 18/133 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
FWIW, I have retired xmms. Upstream is long gone, and it was being held
together by spider-webs anyways.
~spot
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 4:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:01 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 22 2021 at 09:23:23 AM +1000, Bob Hepple
> > w
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:38:56AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InstallGPTwithKickstart
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Add support for configuring GPT partition table in kickstart without
> requiring a custom pre-installation script or a custom boot script.
> [[Categor
You are reminded that voting in the F34 election cycle is open through
23:59 UTC on Thursday 3 June.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:00 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Voting in the Fedora Linux 34 elections is now open. Go to the
> Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
> Thursday
I tried to login to vote but I get a 400 error when I try.
It's been 3 days already.
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 18:57, Ben Cotton wrote:
> You are reminded that voting in the F34 election cycle is open through
> 23:59 UTC on Thursday 3 June.
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:00 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
Ive reported the 400 error, here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9990
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 1:19 PM Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
> I tried to login to vote but I get a 400 error when I try.
> It's been 3 days already.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 18:57, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>> You
Hi Silvia,
Hau idatzi du Silvia Sánchez (bhkoh...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2021
mai. 27, og. (19:19)):
>
>
> I tried to login to vote but I get a 400 error when I try.
Had the same problem. I was able to workaround by login in bodhi[1]
and returning to the voting page.
Mikel
[1] https://bodhi
Hi,
On 5/27/21 5:54 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> FWIW, I have retired xmms. Upstream is long gone, and it was being held
> together by spider-webs anyways.
And I've just retired xarchon for similar reasons. xarchon was fun
for me as a fan of the original c64 Archon games, but it really is
time for
Hi!
The documentation package pyparsing-doc includes several examples that
aren't under the project licence (MIT). The License field was corrected.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
Since its beginnings, the Fedora Project has used the freenode IRC network
for our project communications. Due to a variety of recent changes to that
network, the Fedora Project is moving our IRC communications to Libera.Chat.
If you are a current IRC user, please go and register your nick(s) on
L
On Thu, May 27, 2021, 10:28 AM Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:38:56AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InstallGPTwithKickstart
> >
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Add support for configuring GPT partition table in kickstart without
> > requiring a cus
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 3:58 AM Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:49 AM e wrote:
> >
> > sounds unintuitive, but he just speaks truth to power:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/352#comment-734630
> >
> > "I think the GRUB stuff is so esoteric, so conditio
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 2:05 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 3:58 AM Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:49 AM e wrote:
> > >
> > > sounds unintuitive, but he just speaks truth to power:
> > >
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/352#comme
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 02:05:08PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> This sort of analogy is not helpful at all. That's not what I'm doing.
> I'm just giving advice based on my own experience writing books and
> articles on super complicated material, and having a fairly good grasp
> of GRUB behavior in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DKINRYGSNDNRSOY7KYLMJJXDGS4X45TU/
I understand that systemd.Boot is a great achievement and improvement.
But GRUB was great too! And we just cannot throw 70% of GRUB users under the
Fedora bus!
__
Hi Fedorans,
Just a heads-up, texlive-base (where the compiled code and immediate
dependencies lives) and texlive (where the thousands of other noarch
components live) have been updated to TeXLive 2021 in Rawhide (and the
latest available components from CTAN at the time I did the work).
I've don
Marius Schwarz writes:
Am 30.06.20 um 15:34 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
Given Hans proposal [1] introduced systemd/grub2/Gnome upstream changes it
beg the question if now would not be the time to stop supporting booting in
legacy bios mode and move to uefi only supported boot which has be
On 2021-05-27 2:28 p.m., Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It a shame if Fedora were to abandon its long-time users. This proposal
was already brough up earlier this year and was described as a
non-starter back then. I haven't paid attention and I hope this is still
a non-starter; otherwise, as I said, it
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 3:18 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
> P.S. Please don't start the "WHY THE #$%& does texlive make so many
> subpackages" thread unless you're sending me money, fine alcohol, or patches.
I'm amazed you can keep this giant beast working at all. Thank you
for all the work you do on
"Scope" from that Wiki is referring to the scope section of the proposal
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableSystemdOomd#Scope). As of systemd
248 the missing features are landed so ManagedOOMMemoryPressureLimit= is now
available (this was named something else in 247).
El jue, 27 may 2021 a las 19:45, Anita Zhang ()
escribió:
> "Scope" from that Wiki is referring to the scope section of the proposal (
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableSystemdOomd#Scope). As of
> systemd 248 the missing features are landed so
> ManagedOOMMemoryPressureLimit= is now a
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 17:18, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> Hi Fedorans,
>
> Just a heads-up, texlive-base (where the compiled code and immediate
> dependencies lives) and texlive (where the thousands of other noarch
> components live) have been updated to TeXLive 2021 in Rawhide (and the latest
> av
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 19:04, Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 17:18, Tom Callaway wrote:
> >
> > Hi Fedorans,
> >
> > Just a heads-up, texlive-base (where the compiled code and immediate
> > dependencies lives) and texlive (where the thousands of other noarch
> > comp
I opened ticket "revert Qt Wayland By Default On Gnome"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965539
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210527.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210527.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 52
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 80.83 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 27. 05. 21 23:17, Tom Callaway wrote:
Hi Fedorans,
Just a heads-up, texlive-base (where the compiled code and immediate
dependencies lives) and texlive (where the thousands of other noarch components
live) have been updated to TeXLive 2021 in Rawhide (and the latest available
components fr
-20210527.n.0):
ID: 897640 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/897640
ID: 897660 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/897660
ID: 897662 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
Hi,
> I don't know why we all missed it. Butt that appears to be the case.
>
> However, the end goal is to create hybrid BIOS+UEFI cloud images via
> kickstart. (Maybe down the road it could be generally useful, if/when the
> existing bootloader UI bits go away.)
https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/i
54 matches
Mail list logo
