* Fabio Valentini:
>> I'm pretty sure this is the result of *not* updating glibc. Did you
>> attempt a partial upgrade of rawhide, restricting the package set during
>> an update?
>>
>> I cannot reproduce this: In the current compose and buildroot,
>> libglib-2.0.so.0 and libc.so.6 are consi
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020, 09:36 Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Fabio Valentini:
>
> >> I'm pretty sure this is the result of *not* updating glibc. Did you
> >> attempt a partial upgrade of rawhide, restricting the package set
> during
> >> an update?
> >>
> >> I cannot reproduce this: In the current
Dne 21. 10. 20 v 9:36 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Fabio Valentini:
I'm pretty sure this is the result of *not* updating glibc. Did you
attempt a partial upgrade of rawhide, restricting the package set during
an update?
I cannot reproduce this: In the current compose and buildroot,
* Fabio Valentini:
> Ahh, this looks like a bug in fedora-review to me: it needs to use
> buildroot packages for rawhide, not the (potentially lagging) compose.
>
> That's not the problem either. I was using it with the "--enablerepo
> local" flag for mock.
But fedora-review only installs the r
* Vít Ondruch:
> I think that fedora-review is using Mock and Mock is using mirrors by
> default to offload Koji. There is mirrored just composed content
> AFAIK. And I don't see this going to be changed. So how to ensure that
> the compose is consistent and working, unless side-tags are used for
* Jeff Law:
> Perhaps. In the immediate term, can someone untag the latest glibc
> build (big sigh)?
This will definitely make things worse. Please don't do that.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, H
It is first time I see struggle to open Postscript file.
Can confirm, that fully updated F32 ( Cinnamon Spin) doesn't open PS files
at the moment normally.
man -t man > man.ps && xdg-open man.ps turns in:
** (xreader:4091): WARNING **: 13:48:31.381: Error rendering thumbnail
Unable to open the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201020.0):
ID: 703096 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
There is a need to fix OpenCV FTBFS and update it to the current
version which will require to rebuild opencv dependencies.
This rebuilt went fine in copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kwizart/opencv4/packages/
So the plan is to use a side-tag.
Because few packages are affected by the
> See https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34
> Can the change be reverted until we can figure out exactly which
> packages will have to be rebuilt?
I've got a build going with that and a couple of other patches reverted.
-12.f34 should unbreak this.
This really shou
> It's going to come back because its removal breaks compatibility with
> the 2001 POSIX standard. But I expect there will be plenty of
> deprecation warnings around it.
It should be back now in -12.fc34, which is currently building.
Siddhesh
___
devel
Hi,
I noticed that the image available at [1] has been stuck at the
20201004 version for quite some time now. AFACIT, it used to be
updated approx. every day before. Does anyone know what happened? I
understand that the rawhide content might not be 100% reliable, but 17
days without updating the i
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
* Siddhesh Poyarekar:
>> See
>> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34
>> Can the change be reverted until we can figure out exactly which
>> packages will have to be rebuilt?
>
> I've got a build going with that and a couple of other patches
> reverted. -12.f34 shoul
OLD: Fedora-33-20201020.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201021.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Aiming to orphan this package soon, any concerns ?
Thanks.
Ondrej
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:26 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Proposed upstream change:
>
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/1930
>
> Downstream change will be done during this day.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ondrej
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020
If you haven't seen the Community Blog post[1], the DevConf.CZ Call
for Proposals is open. DevConf.CZ will be a virtual event this time
and held in February. Like in years past, there is a dedicated Fedora
track, as well as tracks for other technical areas.
If you have something you are working on
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201020.n.0):
ID: 703161 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/703161
ID: 703170 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_reposi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201020.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201021.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 141
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 36.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 99/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202
Hello everyone,
with the upcoming Python 3.10 update we need to update Python 3 version
globs in Fedora specfiles. The reason is simple, Python version will be one
character longer so the currently omnipresent ?.? glob won't work anymore.
We did this change a few months ago (see:
https://lists.fed
> ankursinha nest python-PyLEMS python-bids-validator python-brian2 python-dipy
> python-fsleyes python-fsleyes-props python-fsleyes-widgets python-fslpy
> python-grabbit python-lazyarray python-mpd2 python-nilearn python-nistats
> python-petlink python-pybids python-pyemd python-pyfim python-pylat
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCo (2020-10-21)
=
Meeting started by decathorpe at 14:00:31 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-10-21/fesco.2020-10-21-14.00.log.html
Meeting sum
Hello,
I've realized recently that the Python 3.9.0 final build failed in ELN:
python3.9-3.9.0-1.eln104:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1620970
The build failure was:
File
"/tmp/tmpip_uvs06/pip-20.1.1-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pip/_vendor/toml/decoder.py",
line 47
TIM
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've realized recently that the Python 3.9.0 final build failed in ELN:
>
> python3.9-3.9.0-1.eln104:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1620970
>
> The build failure was:
>File
> "/tmp/tmpip_uvs06/pip-20.1
On 10/21/20 10:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
1) Why is breezy not in the ELN compose, but is in the Koji buildroot?
It's defined as a buildroot only package:
https://github.com/minimization/content-resolver-input/blob/master/configs/eln-buildroot
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 7:45 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 10/21/20 10:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> 1) Why is breezy not in the ELN compose, but is in the Koji buildroot?
> >
> > It's defined as a buildroot only package:
> > https://github.
On 10/20/20 9:36 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/20/20 7:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
What am I doing wrong? This is on my rawhide VM.
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo=*-debuginfo install python3.9-debuginfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:06 ago on Tue 20 Oct 2020
08:08:20 PM MDT.
No match for ar
On 10/20/20 11:01 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote on 2020/10/21 11:19:
What am I doing wrong? This is on my rawhide VM.
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo=*-debuginfo install python3.9-debuginfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:06 ago on Tue 20 Oct 2020
08:08:20 PM MDT.
No match for
Hi,
To help users choose their native language anaconda tries to evaluate priority
languages based on geolocation and place them first in the list. Proposal[1] is
to broad this scope by appending major/common speaking languages as well. This
may cater to the use case where a major/common langua
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:46:14PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:41 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > > Compress Kernel F
31 matches
Mail list logo
