Re: F33 beta: where are my Rust packages?

2020-10-12 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
I wrote to Igor a week ago, but it seems he's away currently, as I didn't get an answer yet. Do you know of some document that describes how to "go through Igor's whole weird rust side tag build procedure"? Or, if it's not too complicated, would you mind explaining it? _

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-12 Thread Petr Pisar
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 02:37:48PM +0200, clime wrote: > could Fedora and CentOS containers for docker and podman come with > `alias vim=vi` in ~/.bashrc? > > I would very much welcome it as I am used to type vim everywhere but > if vi starts instead I am happy too. I know that the solution is to

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-09-20

2020-10-12 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > GitLab > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for > the GitLab AMA session on Thursday 10th September, and for your > attendance on the day during the call. > Here is the full AMA transcript > https://meetbo

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201012.0 compose check report

2020-10-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201011.0): ID: 691368 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: mod2c

2020-10-12 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 14:04:43 +0200, Andy Mender wrote: > > > Reviewed and approved! Good job! Thanks for the quick review, Andy. Please do let me know if I can help review your packages any time. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/U

Introducing vim-default-editor subpackage - replace nano as a default editor if wanted

2020-10-12 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi, thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the default editor by installing/uninstalling the subpackage. Because of nano was selected as a default editor since Fedora 33+, the new subpackage conflicts with

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201012.0 compose check report

2020-10-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201012.n.0 changes

2020-10-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201011.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201012.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 68 Downgraded packages: 2 Size of added packages: 380.08 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Introducing vim-default-editor subpackage - replace nano as a default editor if wanted

2020-10-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce > vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the > default editor by installing/uninstalling the subpackage. > > Because of nano was selected as

Fedora-Rawhide-20201012.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 21/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201

Re: Introducing vim-default-editor subpackage - replace nano as a default editor if wanted

2020-10-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote: 2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit one of them at a time. Btw, why not to use the Alternatives system for the default text editor, like Debian/Ubuntu d

Re: Introducing vim-default-editor subpackage - replace nano as a default editor if wanted

2020-10-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 8:43 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote: > > 2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get > > crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit > > one of them at a time. > > Btw, why not

Fedora-IoT-34-20201012.0 compose check report

2020-10-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201009.0): ID: 691693 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

Re: F33 beta: where are my Rust packages?

2020-10-12 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:15 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > I wrote to Igor a week ago, but it seems he's away currently, as I didn't get > an answer yet. > > Do you know of some document that describes how to "go through Igor's whole > weird rust side tag build procedure"? Or, if it's not

Re: Introducing vim-default-editor subpackage - replace nano as a default editor if wanted

2020-10-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 08:44, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote: > > 2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get > > crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit > > one of them

Re: Fedora 33: pcscd and xrdp issue

2020-10-12 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 4:16 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 09.10.20 um 13:18 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos: > > LIBCCID_ifdLogLevel=0x000F pcscd --foreground --debug --apdu > --color | tee log.txt > > This the unchanged output: > 00492770 [140407774111296] auth.c:137:IsClientAuthorized() Proce

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-09-20

2020-10-12 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney > wrote: > > GitLab > > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for > > the GitLab AMA session on Thursday 10th September, and for your > > attendance on the day

Re: Introducing vim-default-editor subpackage - replace nano as a default editor if wanted

2020-10-12 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
On 10/12/20 2:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce >> vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the >> default editor by installing/uninstalling the sub

Re: bodhi updates stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-12 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Sorry for top posting, but I'm on mobile at the moment. Please see my post from a couple of weeks ago: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DHLKVLQV2IIB3AGURZ5V37Y2AK2YWSTH/ Many of those stuck updates have no builds associated, therefore they are s

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-12 Thread Joe Doss
On 10/12/20 1:50 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: This would break using Vim when vim-minimal and vim-enhanced are installed (it would start Vi instead of typed Vim). To make it work, vim-minimal would have to conflict with vim-enhanced, which doesn't make sense - Vi and Vim binaries can exist together j

Re: Introducing vim-default-editor subpackage - replace nano as a default editor if wanted

2020-10-12 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:16:31AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: Hi, thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the default editor by installing/uninstalling

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201012.n.0 changes

2020-10-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20201011.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201012.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: bodhi updates stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:26:49PM +, Mattia Verga wrote: > Sorry for top posting, but I'm on mobile at the moment. No worries. Do note that I am on the list and don't need to be directly cc'ed on replies. :) > Please see my post from a couple of weeks ago: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-33-20201012.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201011.n.0): ID: 691959 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691959 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-2020101

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-12 Thread clime
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 07:39, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > On 10/10/20 2:37 PM, clime wrote: > > Hello, > > > > could Fedora and CentOS containers for docker and podman come with > > `alias vim=vi` in ~/.bashrc? > > > > I would very much welcome it as I am used to type vim everywhere but > > if vi sta

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-09-20

2020-10-12 Thread Aoife Moloney
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney >> wrote: >> > GitLab >> > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for >> > the GitLab AMA sessio

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: mod2c

2020-10-12 Thread Andy Mender
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 11:22, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 14:04:43 +0200, Andy Mender wrote: > > > > > > Reviewed and approved! Good job! > > Thanks for the quick review, Andy. Please do let me know if I can help > review your packages any time. > Thanks a lot for the offer :). I

opam2rpm

2020-10-12 Thread Jerry James
A few of us have tossed around the idea of an opam2rpm project before. Over the last few weeks, I've been working on bringing that to life. See what I have so far: https://pagure.io/opam2rpm I made the possibly controversial decision to write opam2rpm in python. I did this so that I could borrow

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-12 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
On 10/12/20 5:15 PM, Joe Doss wrote: > On 10/12/20 1:50 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> This would break using Vim when vim-minimal and vim-enhanced are >> installed (it would start Vi instead of typed Vim). To make it work, >> vim-minimal would have to conflict with vim-enhanced, which doesn't make >

Re: opam2rpm (licensing)

2020-10-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 04:43:09PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I made the possibly controversial decision to write opam2rpm in > python. I did this so that I could borrow code and ideas from other > spec file generators, many of which are written in python. If this > proves to be a sticking point

389ds making a local dns server for local web app.

2020-10-12 Thread rodentskie
Hello, I'm new in using 389ds. I would like to seek for advice regarding on how to make a local DNS. Like, we have a web app running on http://192.168.0.101:558 and I want to bind that address to a DNS, so that the site will be access now using http://foobar.com:558. I followed the instructions