On Mo, 28.09.20 23:37, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
> > Configure "." as "routing domain" on a specific iface and the lookups
> > wil go there preferably. If you put that on your VPN iface this means
> > DNS traffic goes there preferably. If you put that ont he main iface this
>
On Mo, 28.09.20 14:29, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:02 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > On 28/09/2020 15:57, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > > Am 28.09.20 um 13:47 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > > > DNSSEC support in resolved can be enabled through resol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882879
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2013-2/iab-statement-dotless-domains-considered-harmful/
> in this particular case.
I looked at this extensively a couple of months ago. There is also an
ICANN recommendation along similar lines, but
On Mo, 28.09.20 14:11, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> > Well, let's amend that to "first when it's smart to be first." We can't
> > ever *require* DNSSEC validation, because Windows and macOS are not
> > going to do so.
>
> https://tools.ie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883370
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Am 29.09.20 um 10:19 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>
> Also, people would react very allergic if we'd start sending all DNS
> traffic to google or so. I mean, you can't believe how pissed people
> are that we have a fallback in place that if no DNS servers have been
> configured at all or acquired vi
perl-IO-HTML-1.004-1.fc34 changed a license from "GPL+ or Artistic"
to "(GPL+ or Artistic) and Public Domain".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200928.0):
ID: 680066 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Mo, 28.09.20 22:54, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> It can work in company-scope if the company has competent network
> admins. My local DNS server at home resolves local hostnames to private
> IPv4 addresses in the 192.168/16 block. Clients on the Internet see
> another view. Both
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Mo, 28.09.20 11:10, Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) wrote:
> > If the other big OSes would enable DNSSEC client-side by default
> > things might change, but neither Windows nor MacOS or Android do.
> >
> >
> The old unbound-resolveconf actually worked quite well when I played with
> it. The o
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:09:41PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> when looking at a recent issue when a change to lorax templates broke
> composes for ppc64le and s390x I have found that there are packages
> that explicitly require the ncurses package and I wonder if all of these
> Requires are correct.
On Mo, 28.09.20 20:52, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek skrev:
> >On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:15:36PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> Hey for those of us in the peanuts gallery watching this play out.. could
> >> each of you point out which standards
On Tuesday, September 29, 2020 1:01:23 AM MST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 28.09.20 23:37, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
>
> > > Configure "." as "routing domain" on a specific iface and the lookups
> > > wil go there preferably. If you put that on your VPN iface this me
Le 2020-09-29 12:37, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
This is not the reality I live in though. New-style high level
programming languages tend to avoid being just a wrapper around C
APIs. And thus they implement minimal DNS clients themselves, ignoring
the LLMNR, mDNS and so on.
Not just for DNS.
On Di, 29.09.20 03:49, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
> Search domains have absolutely nothing to do with routing. Search domains are
> specifically used for resolving non-FQDN to FQDN. This isn't a reliable way to
> see what domains are handled by a VPN, or by any DNS server.
>
>
On Tuesday, September 29, 2020 3:59:14 AM MST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 03:49, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
>
> > Search domains have absolutely nothing to do with routing. Search domains
> > are specifically used for resolving non-FQDN to FQDN. This isn't a
Hi Paul,
is there any generic protocol exchanging what (sub)domains should be
targetted to specific DNS server? I know dnssec-trigger/unbound is able
to send queries only to specified search domains received by DHCP server.
Are you aware of any implementation independent way to store domains for
Hello All,
I came across an amazing project called GNU Guix.
So, I made an animation to introduce the novel concepts of this project.
Here is the link for the video,
https://gnuguix-drive.mycozy.cloud/public?sharecode=YvERPGX14g5S
Please leave me a feedback on your experience.
Cheers,
Cuckoo's
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 28.09.20 22:54, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
>
> > It can work in company-scope if the company has competent network
> > admins. My local DNS server at home resolves local hostnames to private
> > IPv4 addresses in the 192.168/16 block. Clients on t
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:41:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, September 28, 2020 9:39:17 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > You can do this, but again, you need to use the command line. E.g.
> > 'resolvectl dns tun0 8.8.8.8'
> >
> > We're actually no longer debating how systemd
Hi,
> NetworkManager pushes DNS server configuration (and associated bits like
> domain
> search and routing domains) over dbus to resolved. That way it "[tells
> resolved how
> to] split DNS according to routing". Of course, after the name has been
> resolved
> to an IP address, the packets to
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:27:37AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
> > https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2013-2/iab-statement-dotless-domains-considered-harmful/
> > in this particular case.
>
> I looked at this extensively a couple of
OLD: Fedora-33-20200928.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200929.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 782.94 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:48 AM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 28.09.20 22:54, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> >
> > > It can work in company-scope if the company has competent network
> > > admins. My local DNS server at home resolves local hostnames to
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:10 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> when looking at a recent issue when a change to lorax templates broke
> composes for ppc64le and s390x I have found that there are packages
> that explicitly require the ncurses package and I wonder if all of these
> Requires are correct. Becaus
Hi Ben,
> Nope! I've updated the F33 and F34 packages to correct the
> dependencies. Thanks for highlighting this.
Should not be an issue,
https://gnuguix-drive.mycozy.cloud/public?sharecode=YvERPGX14g5S
Cheers,
Cuckoo's Calling.
___
devel mailing list
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:43:14PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> The built-in path is: /etc/termcap, /usr/share/misc/termcap. But none of these
> directories exist in Fedora. ncurses-base has /usr/share/terminfo. My
> knowledge about termcap and terminfo is zero, but it seems that
> /usr/share/terminf
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200928.n.0):
ID: 680393 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/680393
ID: 680404 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_p
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:12:40AM +, Cuckoo's Calling via devel wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I came across an amazing project called GNU Guix.
>
> So, I made an animation to introduce the novel concepts of this project.
>
> Here is the link for the video,
> https://gnuguix-drive.mycozy.cloud/pub
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:26:46AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:12:40AM +, Cuckoo's Calling via devel wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I came across an amazing project called GNU Guix.
> >
> > So, I made an animation to introduce the novel concepts of this project.
> >
On Di, 29.09.20 04:03, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
> > Search domains on VPNs are an indicator that these domains are handled
> > by the VPN, that's why we use them also as routing domains. But this
> > doesn't mean it's the *only* routing domains we use. We use the ones
> > yo
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:30:01PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:26:46AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:12:40AM +, Cuckoo's Calling via devel wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I came across an amazing project called GNU Guix.
On Di, 29.09.20 13:47, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 28.09.20 22:54, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> >
> > > It can work in company-scope if the company has competent network
> > > admins. My local DNS server at home resolves local h
On 2020-09-29 21:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:30:01PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:26:46AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:12:40AM +, Cuckoo's Calling via devel wrote:
Hello All,
I came acr
On 9/29/20 10:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 28.09.20 23:37, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
>>> Configure "." as "routing domain" on a specific iface and the lookups
>>> wil go there preferably. If you put that on your VPN iface this means
>>> DNS traffic goes there
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:45:24PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-09-29 21:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:30:01PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:26:46AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:12:40AM +, Cu
Hi Lennart,
more below...
On 9/29/20 3:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 04:03, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
>>> Search domains on VPNs are an indicator that these domains are handled
>>> by the VPN, that's why we use them also as routing domains. But this
>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Di, 29.09.20 04:03, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
> > > Search domains on VPNs are an indicator that these domains are handled
> > > by the VPN, that's why we use them also as routing domains. But this
> > > doesn
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:38:27AM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>
>
> This entire discussion is generating enough emails per hour to be an IRC
> discussion. Could we please move this discussion to #fedora-devel or
> someplace more appropriate?
Well, not everyone is on IRC, and email is sometime
nss-dns is allright. All you need to have is dns server with domain
configurable servers.
Those are:
- unbound (with dnssec-trigger autoconfigured)
- dnsmasq
- systemd-resolved
- probably knot-resolver
- bind (not more difficult to reconfigure runtime)
Maybe more. It is not about nss, because /et
Fedora 33 Beta Released
--
The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of Fedora 33 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora 33 release
at the end of October.
Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
* Get Fedora 33 Beta Work
On 9/29/20 3:44 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 13:47, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
>
>> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Mo, 28.09.20 22:54, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
>>>
It can work in company-scope if the company has competent network
a
Upstream is slowly dying out, since the official Github CLI[1] was
announced. The latest upstream release doesn't pass the test suite on
Golang 1.15[2] and I don't have the time to spare these days, so I'm
going to orphan it and let someone else take over.
[1] https://cli.github.com/
[2] https://
Hi,
I'm coordinating rebuilds of packages due to the libevent rebase [1]
and I'm having trouble reaching owners of some of the packages. Is
there a proven packager willing to help me with the rebuilds?
The rebuilds should be done using the following command:
fedpkg build --target=f34-build-side-
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Well, but how do you determine "local resources"?
This is not the proper question. The proper question is "what are you
trying to do". The .local domain discovery clearly is something meant
to be local.
I assume the real question is: How to conve
On Di, 29.09.20 16:03, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > For example, if I have my laptop in my home wifi, connected to RH VPN,
> > then there are some names resolvable only via the local
> > DNS. Specifically: my router's, my printer's and my NAS' address. And
> > there are other names
On Di, 29.09.20 16:51, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > I am just saying: Fedora cannot be focussed on just working for people
> > who have a competent company admin and use their laptops in
> > company networks only. We must have something that works well in
> > company networks, as i
On 9/29/20 8:55 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Upstream is slowly dying out, since the official Github CLI[1] was
announced. The latest upstream release doesn't pass the test suite on
Golang 1.15[2] and I don't have the time to spare these days, so I'm
going to orphan it and let someone else take o
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, Petr Menšík wrote:
is there any generic protocol exchanging what (sub)domains should be
targetted to specific DNS server?
The search domains are usually the only signal available and used for
this. RFC 7296 (IKEv2) and split-DNS (RFC 8598) defines the sent domain
name list
On Tuesday, September 29, 2020 6:41:12 AM MST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 04:03, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
>
> > > Search domains on VPNs are an indicator that these domains are handled
> > > by the VPN, that's why we use them also as routing domains. But t
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 23:37 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, September 28, 2020 12:42:32 PM MST Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mo, 28.09.20 12:14, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I don't
On Di, 29.09.20 11:21, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
> No further magic should be needed. The user selects this once when
> joining a new network.
This is terrible UI. It was on Windows, and it would be on Linux.
You shouldn't ask questions people cannot possibly answer
correctly. There's
On Tuesday, September 29, 2020 5:13:48 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:41:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Monday, September 28, 2020 9:39:17 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > > You can do this, but again, you need to use the command line
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:40 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Chuck Anderson
> wrote:
> > I think the VPN plugin and VPN server has some input, no? All the
> > VPN
> > servers I've used send routes to the VPN client to determine which
> > traffic the client shoul
On 9/29/20 5:23 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 16:51, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>> I am just saying: Fedora cannot be focussed on just working for people
>>> who have a competent company admin and use their laptops in
>>> company networks only. We must have som
Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
"QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as:
"The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is unconfirmed,
and for verifying the fix once the bug has been resolved."
Ho
On 9/29/20 5:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 16:03, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>> For example, if I have my laptop in my home wifi, connected to RH VPN,
>>> then there are some names resolvable only via the local
>>> DNS. Specifically: my router's, my printer'
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:20:46PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 13:32 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 07:57:13AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > > On 9/28/20 6:47 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > Instructions were already posted
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 09:18 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 29, 2020 5:13:48 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:41:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, September 28, 2020 9:39:17 AM MST Michael Catanzaro
> > >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:27:37AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:38:27AM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> >
> >
> > This entire discussion is generating enough emails per hour to be an IRC
> > discussion. Could we please move this discussion to #fedora-devel or
> > somepla
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, Lennart Poettering wrote:
"Custom" is in the eye of the beholder. It appears to me you mean that
in a derogatory way.
I went out of my way to compare the systemd-resolved team to te DNS teams
consisting of dozens of full time senior people working 20+ years on
DNS with ann
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
>
> Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as:
>
> "The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is un
Dne 28. 09. 20 v 18:03 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:51 am, Ian Pilcher
> wrote:
>> I anticipated this question. I don't have a good proposal for you ...
>> but I believe that it's up to the people advocating/implementing this
>> change to come up with that. If it is
On 9/29/20 10:44 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Is there a plan to package `gh` in Fedora?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803302
I am slogging through it slowly.
Joe
--
Joe Doss
j...@solidadmin.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f
Thought I would try the beta out on my laptop again (had tried it on
test week, but had to revert due to platform.io not working) Getting
error of : " Secure Boot Image failed to verify with * ACCESS DENIED*
"
It worked on the btrfs test week, so I am unsure what went wrong.
Laptop is Lenovo T44
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:03:29PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> > "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
> >
> > Bugzilla describes "QA
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 10:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 28.09.20 14:29, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:02 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > > On 28/09/2020 15:57, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > > > Am 28.09.20 um 13:47 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:17:51AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:03:29PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> > > "QA Contact" field
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 12:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 03:49, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
> > Search domains have absolutely nothing to do with routing. Search domains
> > are
> > specifically used for resolving non-FQDN to FQDN. This isn't a reliable
On Di, 29.09.20 13:56, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 12:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Di, 29.09.20 03:49, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Search domains have absolutely nothing to do with routing. Search domains
> > > are
> > >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:00 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 03:49, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
>
> > Search domains have absolutely nothing to do with routing. Search
> domains are
> > specifically used for resolving non-FQDN to FQDN. This isn't a reliable
> wa
On 9/29/20 5:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 16:03, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>> For example, if I have my laptop in my home wifi, connected to RH VPN,
>>> then there are some names resolvable only via the local
>>> DNS. Specifically: my router's, my printer'
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm coordinating rebuilds of packages due to the libevent rebase [1]
> and I'm having trouble reaching owners of some of the packages. Is
> there a proven packager willing to help me with the rebuilds?
>
> The rebuilds shou
Hi All,
When originally conceived, ELN followed all architectures that Fedora
builds for. The intention here was good but we have discovered that
it is causing some burden for maintainers and there is no underlying
reason for this in the Enterprise context.
I've filed https://github.com/fedora-e
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 16:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:20:46PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 13:32 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 07:57:13AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > > > On 9/28/20 6:47 AM
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:40 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Chuck Anderson
> > wrote:
> > > I think the VPN plugin and VPN server has some input, no? All the
> > > VPN
> > > servers I've used send route
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 20:01 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 13:56, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 12:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Di, 29.09.20 03:49, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Search domains ha
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 18:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
>
> Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as:
>
> "The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is unconfirmed,
>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
>
> Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as:
>
> "The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is unconfirmed,
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 15:14 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:40 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Chuck Anderson > > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > I think the VPN plugin and VPN server has
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 5:21 pm, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
Yes, I too would prefer if my regular, non-RH DNS traffic never goes
to RH servers while I am in the VPN, and I can easily configure things
that way. But if I am pretty sure the majority of people probably put
more emphasis "please pleas
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:06 pm, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
It is not an exotic one, but this behavior was in the past considered
a vulnerability (information disclosure) [0]. Are we re-introducing
it? I guess yes, and it can be that the benefits of it outweigh the
vulnerability, but we shou
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:51 pm, Petr Menšík
wrote:
Anyway, we might forgive working dnssec validation. What we cannot
forgive is lack of DNSSEC information passtrough in 2020.
I agree this should be fixed. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879028.
However, since this only ma
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:28 pm, Petr Menšík
wrote:
nss-dns is allright. All you need to have is dns server with domain
configurable servers.
Those are:
- unbound (with dnssec-trigger autoconfigured)
- dnsmasq
- systemd-resolved
- probably knot-resolver
- bind (not more difficult to reconfig
On 9/29/20 6:18 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 29.09.20 11:21, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
>
>> No further magic should be needed. The user selects this once when
>> joining a new network.
>
> This is terrible UI. It was on Windows, and it would be on Linux.
>
> You shouldn't
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:32 pm, Petr Menšík
wrote:
Are you sure? Can it?
It cannot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879028
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora
On 9/29/20 10:05 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:28 pm, Petr Menšík wrote:
>> nss-dns is allright. All you need to have is dns server with domain
>> configurable servers.
>>
>> Those are:
>> - unbound (with dnssec-trigger autoconfigured)
>> - dnsmasq
>> - systemd-r
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DebugInfoLldbIndex
== Summary ==
Provide .debug_names debug info index for LLDB for clang-built
binaries using: clang -gdwarf-5 -gpubnames
Debuginfo index significantly accelerates loading of *.debug files by
debugger. Fedora currently provides ELF section .
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware
== Summary ==
Compress Kernel Firmwares to reduce on disk size
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
* Email: [mailto:pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org| pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org]
== Detailed Description ==
Since the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNS_Over_TLS
== Summary ==
Fedora will attempt to use DNS over TLS (DoT) if supported by
configured DNS servers.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:catanzaro|Michael Catanzaro]]
* Email:
* Name: [[User:Zbyszek|Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]]
* Email:
== Detailed De
Hi Jan,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 05:28:57PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:31:59 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I do find your statistics per package useful because they show dwz is
> > in general effective by producing at least 20% (more) on-disk size
> > reduction,
>
> I
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 05:46:08PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:35:26 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > So, was this compiled by GCC or clang?
>
> Fedora Koji package:
> lldb-debuginfo-11.0.0-0.2.rc3.fc34.x86_64
>
> GNU GIMPLE 10.2.1 20200916 (Red Hat 10.2.1-4) -m64 -
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:01 pm, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
So, I defer to Michael here: I didn't actually check what NM opted
there. It might very well be that they default to configuring "." as
routing domain for VPNs.
Yes, this is what happens.
Qualification: it's what should happen, sans b
Hi Jan,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 04:50:59PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> To make DWZ better consumable it needs to have the partial units separately
> parseable. That way they can be shared at IR level and not just at DWARF
> level
> That means:
> * DW_TAG_partial_unit should have DW_AT_language
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-09-30 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware
>
> == Summary ==
> Compress Kernel Firmwares to reduce on disk size
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> * Email: [mailto:pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org| pb
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:41 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Compress Kernel Firmwares to reduce on disk size
> >
> > == Owner ==
> > * Name: [[User:pbrobinso
On 29/09/2020 17:21, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> For the VPN scenario, it is just a little bit more complicated.
>
> For those with proper standards, such as "Cisco IPsec", L2TP/IPsec",
> the VPN confiuration is dictated by the server to either send all or
> some traffic to the VPN server. If it is n
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
