Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

You have to create a database and a user with permissions in that database for nextcloud. Verify that the web server is running Then go to http:///nextcloud, you will see the installer webpage, select mysql as the database and set the user and the database you previously created and it will perform

rubygem-asciidoctor Fedora 31 update

Hello, Are there any plans to upgrade the spec file of rubygem-asciidoctor for Fedora 31 to the 2.0.10 version? Thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Co

Re: koji wait-repo (newRepo) is really taking a long time

On 03. 04. 20 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I've been waiting on: $ koji wait-repo f33-build-side-20855 --build=ocaml-lacaml-9.3.2-17.fc33 for hours now. Seems like newRepo generation is again taking a very long time? Also it'd be nice if this command didn't time out after 2 hours (seems

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On 4/3/20 4:41 PM, Leigh Griffin wrote: This is how a specific flavour of software development works centered on a singular product, with a shared vision. The CPE relationship with stakeholders is unique, it's clear the visions are not aligned across all bodies (and we do not expect it to be) a

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2020-04-06 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. We met last week and I don't think we have any urgent business this week. There will be a blocker review meeting. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and ru

[Test-Announce] 2020-04-06 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting

# F32 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-04-06 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Final blockers and 1 proposed Final freeze exception to review, so let's have a Fedora 32 blocker review meeting on Monday! If you have time this w

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: kyrofa

Hi Kyle, Great to hear, thanks. If you'd like a comaintainer, please add me - it's blocking one of our projects at work. Thanks, Michel Apr 3, 2020 14:06:52 Kyle Fazzari : > Hello Michel, > > Don't worry, I'm alive, I've just been slammed the last few weeks. I'll > look into EPEL 8 soon. >

Re: @core install picking up desktop packages

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 03:12:35PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Maybe libsecret spec could provide an empty libsecret-never-fail subpackage > that would hard-require a libsecret server and the applications like geary > would > require that subpackage. (Alternatively libsecret-devel could provide

Re: %bcond_with/%bcond_without

On 03.04.20 22:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > So... could we please get a way to express this in rpm with a sane syntax: > > %define_cond docs 0%{?fedora} > 0 Oh please, yes. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: %bcond_with/%bcond_without

On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 20:36 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > 1. The logic is reversed: when I see "with" I think something is > enabled, >when I see "without" I think something is disabled. But it's > actually >the other way around here, which I find very confusing and often > ge

<    1   2