Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:34:35AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 12:55 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > > > > What really worries to me is that: > > > * using GitLab as SaaS is being considered, and > > > * for self-hosting, using the proprietary "enterprise" editions is no

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 20:04, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:44:35AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I'm sorry, but I have to agree with Kevin and Michael here to a > > > significant extent. Running our own proj

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 21:18 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 20:04, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:44:35AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I'm sorry, but I have to agree with Kevin

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On 3/31/20 1:40 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 13:08:05 -0400,  Matthew Miller wrote: We did communicate as the very top line of our gathered requirements that open source is essential to our community and central to our feedback. I'm not trying to be soft on that. Let's

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

Clement Verna writes: > Neal Gompa wrote: >> Clement Verna wrote: >> >> As for Pagure itself, I think this is where we fundamentally >> disagree. I think it behooves us to own and provide an experience >> tailored for our community from beginning to end. That's why we have >> Koji, Bodhi, Dist

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

On Sunday, 29 March 2020 13:13:53 CEST you wrote: > golang-github-influxdata-flux eclipseo > golang-github-influxdata-influxdb eclipseo > golang-github-nats-io-streaming eclipseo > golang-github-opencontainers-runc eclipseo > golang-k8s-kubernetes eclipseo > golang-k8s-legacy-cloud-providers eclips

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

Dne út 31. bře 2020 21:00 uživatel Clement Verna napsal: > > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 14:57, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:10 AM Clement Verna >> wrote: >> > >> > I just want to give a bit of insight from someone who is working day to >> day on Fedora's infrastructure, since

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:25 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 21:18 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 20:04, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:44:35AM -0700, Adam

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 17:06 -0400, Paul Frields wrote: > > > Sure. I tend to think of these as 'upstream projects' that we (Fedora) > > consume as a downstream. Project hosting has always been a kinda > > optional bolt-on, I think; going back to the days of fedorahosted.org I > > don't think we've

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200330.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200329.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200330.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 244 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 592.23 MiB Size of dropped packages:2

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:23 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 17:06 -0400, Paul Frields wrote: > > > > > Sure. I tend to think of these as 'upstream projects' that we (Fedora) > > > consume as a downstream. Project hosting has always been a kinda > > > optional bolt-on, I think;

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

On 31. 03. 20 23:00, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On Sunday, 29 March 2020 13:13:53 CEST you wrote: golang-github-influxdata-flux eclipseo golang-github-influxdata-influxdb eclipseo golang-github-nats-io-streaming eclipseo golang-github-opencontainers-runc eclipseo golang-k8s-kubernetes eclipseo

silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

Hi, I am the maintainer of slim. As per BZ and here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41322154 slim was unable to build BuildError: error building package (arch armv7hl), mock exited with status 1; see root.log for more information However, I can not figure out where to see th

Re: Odd build failure on Fedora 32

Thank you for explaining the root cause of the issue. Is the fix available on the build system for Fedora 32 at this time of writing so I can run YaraRay build? Thanks again. On 2020-03-30 1:49 p.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29/03/20 11:31 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, Can so

Re: silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

On 3/31/20 7:04 PM, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: I am the maintainer of slim. As per BZ and here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41322154 slim was unable to build BuildError: error building package (arch armv7hl), mock exited with status 1; see root.log for more informa

[Bug 1819006] perl-Test-Simple-1.302174 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819006 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedo

Re: silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:05 PM Globe Trotter via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am the maintainer of slim. As per BZ and here: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41322154 > > slim was unable to build > > BuildError: error building package (arch armv

Re: silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

Thanks! Yes, I believe that I took it from someone (can't recall who). Crikes, rewriting a spec file to make it up to date may not be that easy for me. Let us see. Thanks again! On Tuesday, March 31, 2020, 9:17:01 PM CDT, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:05 PM Globe Trott

Re: silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

The root of the problem seems to be this but I can't find the bad macro or the line number: slim.spec: E: specfile-error error: This macro requires some arguments Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe sen

Re: silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

Apparently %systemd_postun requires an argument now but did not before. I'm dong a test build now and will commit my updates if successful but will not perform a formal build. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Re: silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

For some reason the cmake setup is not linking with libXft causing undefined references during linking. I did not explore this but just forced it with LDFLAGS. I got a good build with both rawhide and Fedora 31. I committed my updates to master so you can take it from there (do a fedpkg pull). Th

Re: silly question: finding root.log/build.log of FTBS F32 package (slim)

On 3/31/20 7:16 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:05 PM Globe Trotter via devel mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: I am the maintainer of slim. As per BZ and here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41322154 slim was unable to build

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 22:41, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Clement Verna writes: > > > Neal Gompa wrote: > >> Clement Verna wrote: > >> > >> As for Pagure itself, I think this is where we fundamentally > >> disagree. I think it behooves us to own and provide an experience > >> tailored for our com

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On 3/31/20 8:59 PM, Clement Verna wrote: On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 14:57, Neal Gompa > wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:10 AM Clement Verna mailto:cve...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > I just want to give a bit of insight from someone who is working

<    1   2