On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 08:47:03AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > == pcre -> pcre2 ==
> >
> > Moving grep (one of the last packages using pcre) to pcre2. [4]
>
> I'm curious if we should simply replace grep by ripgrep :)
Crossed my mind too. But grep is 800k, ripgrep 4500k. In case of grep we us
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Branched 20190928.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > I'm quite certain that forbidding people to move to module-only would mean
> > that we would not only not have a Java stack in Fedora but also no Java
> > module too.
>
> I think that banning module-only packages w
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20190927.n.1):
ID: 459676 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/459676
ID: 459712 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
i
OLD: Fedora-31-20190927.n.1
NEW: Fedora-31-20190928.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 450.65 MiB
Size of dropped packages:19.25 MiB
Ok, thank you. I have requested a branch for f31 and epel8.
May be, there is no whitelist within fedora.
Regardless of this the package appears in the repo:
https://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/u/
Stefan
Am Di., 24. Sept. 2019 um 02
Hello, Brian.
On Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 23:08, Brian Sipos wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've been working with RHEL and CentOS packages since about 2011, but
> mostly in the domain of private Yum repositories. I've done some work
> in the past with the SUSE Build Service also. I'm familiar with
>
On Friday, September 27, 2019 8:01:42 AM MST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:53:32AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> To make things even more interesting, the non-modular Java stack has
> almost reached parity with what's available from the shiny module
> branches, except a handful of packages that require more work than a
> simple "bump version and build" (for example, the rebase from ma
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
10 matches
Mail list logo
