Fabio Valentini wrote:
> To make things even more interesting, the non-modular Java stack has
> almost reached parity with what's available from the shiny module
> branches, except a handful of packages that require more work than a
> simple "bump version and build" (for example, the rebase from maven
> 3.5 to 3.6 is still pending, but I'm planning to work on that soon).
Does that include Eclipse, where the packagers recently announced that it
would become module-only?
(That said, all the Java projects I work with are set up for NetBeans, so I
don't really use Eclipse anyway. I'm just asking for curiosity. Sadly, the
NetBeans Fedora package was abandoned long ago, long before Modularity has
become a thing, so that one is a wholly different story.)
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
