Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On ti, 03 syys 2019, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:25 PM Robert Marcano wrote: On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il

Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement

Il 03/09/19 01:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > It seems in testing ok on the master mirrors... > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/30/Everything/SRPMS/Packages/s/skychart-4.1.1-5.4000svn.fc30.src.rpm > Interesting, so the package IS in the mirrors, but metadata doesn't

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

On 03/08/19 19:29 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Tom Hughes writes: But I think upstream is giving very bad advice... That define does not "add extra crashes" in the way that they seem to think - well I mean it does literally but those crashes are reports of program errors on their part. Speci

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

On 2019-09-02, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 02. 09. 19 v 14:25 Petr Pisar napsal(a): >> The point is that the one who designed these rules forgot that people >> will want to upgrade from an unsupported stream to a supportrf one. And >> that the upgrade should be silent and automatic for cases when

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

Le 2019-09-02 19:27, Kevin Kofler a écrit : Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: 2. However the IETF explicitely forbid it when defining the ISO 8501 subset allowed on the Internet RFC 3339> Although ISO 8601 permits the hour to be "24", this profile of ISO RFC 3339> 8601 only allows values betwe

package name and spec name missmatch

Hi All, An rpm package has been created by name fctxpd. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd But my spec file name and the name field in my spec file is fc_txptd. And my SRPM also has the name with fc_txptd. And I push the SRPM with fc_txptd because of which fedpkg build is failing. fedp

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

On 03/08/19 23:14 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Andrew Lutomirski writes: On a cursory search of the standard, I couldn't find where it says what operator* on this type of iterator does at all, let alone whether it's valid for one-past-the-end iterators, but I'm pretty sure that your code is, i

package name and spec name missmatch

Hi All, An rpm package has been created by name fctxpd. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd But my spec file name and the name field in my spec file is fc_txptd. And my SRPM also has the name with fc_txptd. And I push the SRPM with fc_txptd because of which fedpkg build is failing. fedp

Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement

On 2019-09-03, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 03/09/19 01:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: >> >> It seems in testing ok on the master mirrors... >> >> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/30/Everything/SRPMS/Packages/s/skychart-4.1.1-5.4000svn.fc30.src.rpm >> > Interesting,

Re: fedpkg push output

On 03. 09. 19 8:20, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote: Hi All, When I run the fedpkg push iam getting the below o/p . Can anyone tell me is everything fine with the fedpkg push operation. Yes, the push was fine, this is just noise. git commit -sm "Initial import (#1735762)" [master ba1a11d]

Re: package name and spec name missmatch

On 2019-09-03, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote: > Hi All, An rpm package has been created by name fctxpd. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd > > > But my spec file name and the name field in my spec file is fc_txptd. > > And my SRPM also has the name with fc_txptd. And I push the SRPM

Re: package name and spec name missmatch

(Cc'd reviewer/sponsor: eclipseo) On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 13:42:18 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote: > Hi All, Hi Muneendra, > An rpm package has been created by name fctxpd. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd > > > But my spec file name and the name field in my spec file is fc_

RE: package name and spec name missmatch

Hi Ankur, https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/ ==>the name of the git repositriy Is as per brocade guide lines(bsn is the domain name). So if I create a new SRPM file with proper spec file and Do the same process like below should resolve the issue ? fedpkg import PATH_TO_SRPM git commit -m

Re: libexempi SONAME bump in rawhide

Thanks for the heads-up! I can rebuild caja and eog when new exempi version is in rawhide. Maybe you post that here? Wolfgang ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fed

Re: libexempi SONAME bump in rawhide

typo in previous post s/eog/eom/g ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List G

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Il giorno mar, 03/09/2019 alle 09.59 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: > Forgot to add a reference I marked as [1] before sending email. > > [1] > https://sambaxp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/sambaxp2019-slides/schneider_sambaxp2019_samba_in_love_with_gnutls.pdf > All very interesting I have r

Re: package name and spec name missmatch

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 14:38:45 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M wrote: > Hi Ankur, > > https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/ > ==>the name of the git repositriy Is as per brocade guide lines(bsn is the > domain name). Sure, that's really for the maintainer (you) to decide with upstream (brocade?). > S

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On ti, 03 syys 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mar, 03/09/2019 alle 09.59 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: Forgot to add a reference I marked as [1] before sending email. [1] https://sambaxp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/sambaxp2019-slides/schneider_sambaxp2019_samba_in_love_with_gnutls.pdf

RE: package name and spec name missmatch

Hi peter, https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/ ==>the name of the git repositriy Is as per brocade guide lines(bsn is the domain name). We will be using the fctxpd name so that the existing repository will work. I have made the changes and build the package for few distributions. https://

Re: package name and spec name missmatch

On 2019-09-03, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote: > Hi peter, > https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/ > ==>the name of the git repositriy Is as per brocade guide lines(bsn is > the domain name). > > We will be using the fctxpd name so that the existing repository will work. > > I have made t

Re: powertop vs upower, troubleshooting battery remaining

Hi Chris, On 03-09-19 01:47, Chris Murphy wrote: This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29, there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the time estimates were sane. Something's wonky on Fedora 30 and I'm not sure where to begin troubleshooting, alth

Re: Is Modularity (MBS) dead?

On 2019-09-01, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > 3) New modules (even which contain just one component) don't start > even after 30 minutes > (https://mbs.fedoraproject.org/module-build-service/1/module-builds/6151) > Probably issues with fedmgs . -- Petr

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190903.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190903.0 Commit(x86_64): dd9fc5fd415d08b2f5aff025da85d3a4839fcae1f70b1a444c4a5ef31e3ee253 Commit(aarch64): 3dd79159e79a4259ee97159ea34c318f12c856a83dd735a8e3a9a62e644fcc63 Commit(ppc64le): becd5399c3138944eaba68f7c

Re: powertop vs upower, troubleshooting battery remaining

On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 00:48, Chris Murphy wrote: > This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29, > there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the > time estimates were sane. If you downgrade back to a F29 live session, is it sane again? If the answer is

Fedora-Rawhide-20190903.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 11 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED: compose.cl

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190903.0

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:31 PM wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190903.0 > Commit(x86_64): > dd9fc5fd415d08b2f5aff025da85d3a4839fcae1f70b1a444c4a5ef31e3ee253 > Commit(aarch64): > 3dd79159e79a4259ee97159ea34c318f12c856a83dd735a8e3a9a62

Fedora-31-20190903.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 15/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190902.n.0): ID: 440636 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/440636 ID: 440640 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostre

Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

This is to let you know that I intend to orphan dblatex. Background: dblatex depends on python 2 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737967) which will be retired in Fedora 32 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython2). Some packages depend on dblatex directly, some indire

Reviving torque

I'm going to revive torque (one of my packages depends on it). Looks like it was abandoned by the old maintainer, but the fix to get it building again was trivial (missing a tex BuildRequires). If there are any reasons not to, speak up, please. Thanks, Tom

Copr retention policy has been changed

Hi. Copr is running out of space. No need to panic. We still have 400 GB of free space, but that is last 5 % of our capacity. To not reach the roof, I decided to change our retention policy https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#how-long-do-you-keep-the-builds It has been

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190903.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190902.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190903.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 139 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 88 Downgraded packages: 2 Size of added packages: 1.56 GiB Size of dropped packages

aarch64 toolchain regression?

Builds that were previously succeeding (e.g. pulseaudio) are now failing on aarch64 with errors like: BUILDSTDERR: annobin: modules/module-loopback.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit target Failed scratch build: https://userbase.kde.org/Konversation/Configuring_SASL_authentication Prior successful build

Re: aarch64 toolchain regression?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > Builds that were previously succeeding (e.g. pulseaudio) are now failing on > aarch64 with errors like: > BUILDSTDERR: annobin: modules/module-loopback.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit > target See also: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/deve

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Il giorno mar, 03/09/2019 alle 12.47 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: > provide all debug information and network traces you could. Ok, I will fill de bug into Fedora Bugzilla, I use a Fedora 30 Server. Someone can tell me what I can get some debug information and network traffic? I suppose

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On ti, 03 syys 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mar, 03/09/2019 alle 12.47 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: provide all debug information and network traces you could. Ok, I will fill de bug into Fedora Bugzilla, I use a Fedora 30 Server. Someone can tell me what I can get some debug in

[EPEL-devel] Re: libssh2 issues in EPEL8 buildroot

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:01 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > My zabbix40 build for epel8 failed: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37041678 [...] > The other odd thing is that I cannot install libssh2-devel on my RHEL8 vm > because it does not appear to exist: It does not. It i

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Minimization Team Meeting on 2019-09-04 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 GMT At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora Minimization Team Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9598/ __

Re: powertop vs upower, troubleshooting battery remaining

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:13 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > On 03-09-19 01:47, Chris Murphy wrote: > > This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29, > > there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the > > time estimates were sane. > > > > Somethi

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 2019-09-02 13:00: clojure kushal, orphan, s4504kr, 1 weeks ago salimma, walters I would like to take clojure, filed a releng ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8732 BR, Markku _

Re: Is Modularity (MBS) dead?

On 01. 09. 19 21:38, Igor Gnatenko wrote: So did I miss some announcement that Modularity is RIP and nobody should use it or just nobody cares about it and I should find more reliable way to deliver Rust apps? As a bit off topic, it would be really nice if we could install rust apps (ripgrep,

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:37 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > This is to let you know that I intend to orphan dblatex. Note that the gcc package uses dblatex to build libstdc++ documentation. We as a project need to figure out what to do about dblatex's python 2 dependency. -- Jerry James http://www

Re: aarch64 toolchain regression?

Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: >> Builds that were previously succeeding (e.g. pulseaudio) are now failing >> on aarch64 with errors like: >> BUILDSTDERR: annobin: modules/module-loopback.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit >> target > > See also: > https://lists.fed

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

On 03. 09. 19 17:57, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:37 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: This is to let you know that I intend to orphan dblatex. Note that the gcc package uses dblatex to build libstdc++ documentation. We as a project need to figure out what to do about dblatex's pytho

Re: aarch64 toolchain regression?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:21 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > Thanks, any bug(s) filed yet? (If not, I'll do so today). No, I haven't yet gotten around to figuring out which component is misbehaving. It might be annobin, but I'm not certain. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ __

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:27 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > I suppose it can get an exception to continue using Python 2, but since it > appears dead upstream, maybe we should switch to a different tool instead? I'm interested to hear from the gcc developers just how ingrained the dependency on dblatex

Orphaned itext, plan is to retire it in ~2 weeks

I've just orphaned itext, previously owned the Stewardship SIG. The package wasn't updated for over a decade and has an open CVE from Fedora 26 era. The Stewardship SIG took it for maven-doxia, but we've luckily managed to get rid of the dependency. Since this package is dangerous, I'd like t

Re: aarch64 toolchain regression?

> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Builds that were previously succeeding (e.g. pulseaudio) are now failing > >> on aarch64 with errors like: > >> BUILDSTDERR: annobin: modules/module-loopback.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit > >> target > > > > See also: > > > https://lists.fedorap

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/31/19 6:45 PM, John Harris wrote: > On Friday, August 30, 2019 4:33:11 AM MST Björn Persson wrote: >> John Harris wrote: >>> Thing is, binding a port and expecting it to be open to every network >>> interface you've got are two very different things. >> Once again John Harris is completely wro

Re: aarch64 toolchain regression?

* Rex Dieter: > Builds that were previously succeeding (e.g. pulseaudio) are now failing on > aarch64 with errors like: > BUILDSTDERR: annobin: modules/module-loopback.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit > target > > > Failed scratch build: > https://userbase.kde.org/Konversation/Configuring_SASL_authentic

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

On 03/09/19 09:57 -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:37 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: This is to let you know that I intend to orphan dblatex. Note that the gcc package uses dblatex to build libstdc++ documentation. We as a project need to figure out what to do about dblatex's p

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 9:37 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > This is to let you know that I intend to orphan dblatex. > > Background: dblatex depends on python 2 > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737967) which will be retired > in Fedora 32 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ret

Re: aarch64 toolchain regression?

>> Builds that were previously succeeding (e.g. pulseaudio) are now failing on  >> aarch64 with errors like: >> BUILDSTDERR: annobin: modules/module-loopback.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit >> target >> >> >> Failed scratch build: >> https://userbase.kde.org/Konversation/Configuring_SASL_authentication

Intent to orphan php-gettext-gettext

Greetings! I plan to orphan php-gettext-gettext in a week, unless someone else wants to take care of it. I originally packaged it so I could add Ampache to Fedora, but that project was far more difficult than I expected and I decided to abandon it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Nico Kadel-Garcia writes: > Robert Marcano wrote: >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: >> >> I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non

[Bug 1746256] Upgrade perl-Cairo-GObject to 1.005

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746256 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedo

Re: aarch64 toolchain regression?

Peter Robinson wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:27 AM Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> Builds that were previously succeeding (e.g. pulseaudio) are now >> >> failing on aarch64 with errors like: >> >> BUILDSTDERR: annobin: modules/module-loopback.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit >> >> target >> > >> > See als

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

Chris Murphy writes: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:47 PM Emery Berger wrote: >> >> For what it's worth, my research group attacked basically exactly this >> problem some time ago. We built a modified Linux kernel that we called >> Redline that was utterly resilient to fork bombs, malloc bombs, a

round up of failing f31 (branched) images

Hey folks. Looking at the latest incomplete composes (remember: incomplete means at least one non blocking image/thing failed to compose, but all blocking items did compose) at https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issues If you want your spin/image in the beta, you will need to propose a fix

Re: Is Modularity (MBS) dead?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 09. 19 21:38, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > So did I miss some announcement that Modularity is RIP and nobody > > should use it or just nobody cares about it and I should find more > > reliable way to deliver Rust apps? > > As a bit off topi

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:43 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Nico Kadel-Garcia writes: > > > Robert Marcano wrote: > >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >>> Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > > Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritt

Re: Debates/back and forths

You again mention that they are "exactly the same" and then mention their differences. If you want to use your storage space duplicating mailing list archives, have at it - not everybody wants to do that. Again, one is active the other is passive. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:34 PM John Harris wrot

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Nico Kadel-Garcia writes: > Robbie Harwood wrote: >> Nico Kadel-Garcia writes: >>> Robert Marcano wrote: Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >> Dario Lesca wrote: >>> Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with

[HEADS-UP] f31-backgrounds ready for testing

Hello team, f31-backgrounds package is now available for testing on all supported desktop environments. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8b2cccfabf Both supplemental wallpapers and animated default background (time of day) are included as well. Give positive karma to make it a

Re: Debates/back and forths

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 5:38:28 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote: > You again mention that they are "exactly the same" and then mention their > differences. If you want to use your storage space duplicating mailing > list archives, have at it - not everybody wants to do that. Again, one is > acti

Re: Intent to orphan php-gettext-gettext

Hi Randy, I have some interest maintaining it. thanks, sundeep On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:39 PM Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings! > > I plan to orphan php-gettext-gettext in a week, unless someone else > wants to take care of it. I originally packaged it so I could add > Ampache to Fedora, but t