(Cc'd reviewer/sponsor: eclipseo)

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 13:42:18 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote:
> Hi All,

Hi Muneendra,

> An rpm  package has been created by name fctxpd.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd
> 
> 
> But my spec file name and the name field in my spec file is fc_txptd.

> And my SRPM also has the name with fc_txptd.
> And I push the SRPM  with fc_txptd because of which fedpkg build is failing.
> 
> fedpkg import PATH_TO_SRPM
> git commit -m "Initial import (#XXXXXX)."
> git push
> fedpkg build
> 
> Do I need to create a new SRPM with fctxpd and push the same again to git.

Your spec file *must* have the same name as the package:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_file_naming

So, yes, correcting the name of the spec file will "fix" the issue.

If, the name of the software, however, is fc_txptd, then it should've
been reviewed as "fc_txptd" and the SCM repository be called "fc_txptd"
also.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_general_naming

I see the upstream repository is called "bsn-fc-txptd"---neither
fc_txptd nor fxtxptd. Any reason not to use this as the spec and package
name?
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to