Le vendredi 12 avril 2019 à 01:21 -0500, Ty Young a écrit :
>
> Fair enough.Given that only Java 8 and newer is available via
> Fedora's
> repos and things have calmed down a bit, is the complexity still
> worth it though?
You still have OpenJ9 vs OpenJDK, LTS vs non LTS, completely free
softwar
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > Basically, there would now be a button on the sidebar which would show the
> > current monitoring status and would allow project admins and pagure wide
> > admins
> Was this the privileged operation? What privilege does it require? I
> just run the command as a non-admin user and saw no errors or prompts
> for passwords or anything.
Are you part of the wheel group and is wheel configured to be
password-less in sudo?
Dridi
On Do, 11.04.19 17:08, Przemek Klosowski (przemek.klosow...@nist.gov) wrote:
> > The logic in systemd is more strict on putting boundaries on resource
> > usage, and thus will by default not allow you to consume resources
> > while you are not logged in. It's really how this always should have
> >
On Do, 11.04.19 20:49, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > I run a bunch of background jobs like harvesting podcasts that are
> > > released weekly, collecting weather stats for my garden watering
> > > system, monitoring my power feed and UPS, collecting ADSB data,
> > > etc. I don't th
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 18:09, Paul Frields wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:07 PM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
[...]
> [...]
> > 3. atd? Do we still need that? Do we have postinst scripts that need
> >this? If so, wouldn't systemd-run be a better approach for those?
> >Isn't it ti
On Fr, 12.04.19 11:35, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (domi...@greysector.net)
wrote:
> > Interestingly I think Google Chrome needs this when it installs,
> > though it seems nonsensical to me. (Chrome is installed by about 50%
> > of our users given some informal stats, so writing it off would b
* Lennart Poettering:
> Just out of curiosity, why does a web browser need a daily chrome job?
It uses this to persist itself, so that it is more difficult to remove
the Google repository.
I guess we can be lucky that it doesn't does this via /etc/ld.so.preload
or a kernel module.
Thanks,
Flori
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 01:12:51PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, why does a web browser need a daily chrome job?
From the script's comment:
# It creates the repository configuration file for package updates, since
# we cannot do this during the google-chrome installat
Le vendredi 12 avril 2019 à 13:12 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> On Fr, 12.04.19 11:35, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (
> domi...@greysector.net) wrote:
>
> > > Interestingly I think Google Chrome needs this when it installs,
> > > though it seems nonsensical to me. (Chrome is installed by
Once upon a time, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski said:
> Chrome doesn't require atd explicitly (nor is it pulled in by any of its
> dependencies).
That's incorrect. The Google Chrome RPM requires /usr/bin/lsb_release,
which is from redhat-lsb-core, and that requires /usr/bin/at.
--
Chris Adams
On Friday, 12 April 2019 at 14:47, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> said:
> > Chrome doesn't require atd explicitly (nor is it pulled in by any of its
> > dependencies).
>
> That's incorrect. The Google Chrome RPM requires /usr/bin/lsb_release,
> which is
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, at 7:13 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 12.04.19 11:35, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> (domi...@greysector.net) wrote:
>
> > > Interestingly I think Google Chrome needs this when it installs,
> > > though it seems nonsensical to me. (Chrome is installed by about 5
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Mat Booth wrote:
> Eclipse in Fedora has dropped support for 32 bit architectures. The newest
> builds of Eclipse 4.11 for F30 and newer reflect this and are built for 64
> bit architectures only.
>
> By now I have touched most Eclipse plug-in packages to limit th
OLD: Fedora-30-20190411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-30-20190412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Ty Young wrote:
> Which it does but no alternatives show up even when downloading from
> Fedora's repos. Is there no post installation scripts that properly
> registers everything? If not, then how are there symbolic links in
> /etc/alternatives? What are they even for?
There are such post-install
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 12/144 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 381889 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/381889
ID: 381890 Test: x86_64 Workstat
Mlocate too. I am not sure why is this package required but It tremendously
slows down all of my PC(using magnetic disk hard drive). The first thing I do
after installing Fedora Worstation is to remove it.
Regards,
Akarshan Biswas
___
devel mailing l
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Ty Young wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking of switching to Fedora 30 Silverblue(once it comes out of
> beta anyway) from Arch linux. One of the requirements is to be able to
> install, compile from source and easily switch between JDK builds.
Bigger picture, as
Le vendredi 12 avril 2019 à 13:16 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Ty Young wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking of switching to Fedora 30 Silverblue(once it comes out
> > of
> > beta anyway) from Arch linux. One of the requirements is to be able
> > to
> > in
On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 16:29 +, Akarshan Biswas wrote:
> Mlocate too. I am not sure why is this package required but It
> tremendously slows down all of my PC(using magnetic disk hard drive).
> The first thing I do after installing Fedora Worstation is to remove
> it.
It only does that *one tim
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Ty Young wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking of switching to Fedora 30 Silverblue(once it comes out of
> > beta anyway) from Arch linux. One of the requirements is to be able to
> > install, compile from sou
Desktop, UEFI, Z87 chipset, Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3, AMD R9 280X GPU -
Fails, does not show the specified error instead journalctl shows:
gnome-shell[1820]: Failed to create backend: No GPUs found with udev
Which is likely caused by (from dmesg):
[ 11.994228] [drm] VGACON disable radeon kerne
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopt_new_Go_Packaging_Guidelines
== Summary ==
The [[PackagingDrafts/Go| current Go packaging guidelines]] have been in a draft
state for several years now, and they do not reflect the
[[ More_Go_packaging|current practices ]] from the Go SIG. As a result o
Hello folks,
In order to update a few Golang packages, new dependencies needing to
be packaged have appeared. Please, if you have time to help, take a look at
these. They are standard Go packages and all have been tested in Koji or
COPR.
golang-github-getsentry-raven-go
→ need github.com/certif
On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 14:32 -0500, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> Desktop, UEFI, Z87 chipset, Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3, AMD R9 280X GPU -
> Fails, does not show the specified error instead journalctl shows:
>
> gnome-shell[1820]: Failed to create backend: No GPUs found with udev
This is actually expected
On 4/12/19 12:16 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Ty Young wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking of switching to Fedora 30 Silverblue(once it comes out of
beta anyway) from Arch linux. One of the requirements is to be able to
install, compile from source and easily switch between
On 4/12/19 10:40 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ty Young wrote:
Which it does but no alternatives show up even when downloading from
Fedora's repos. Is there no post installation scripts that properly
registers everything? If not, then how are there symbolic links in
/etc/alternatives? What are they e
# F30 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-04-15
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final
freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a Fedora 30 blocker review
meeting on Monday!
If you have time this
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I think we
covered everything already, but if you're aware of anything important
we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can
go ahead and run the meeting. Note there *will* be a blocker review
meeting, and of cour
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 17:24:46 -0500, you wrote:
>According to pkgs.org Fedora Rawhide doesn't even have a 32-bit JRE/JDK
>so i'm not sure why the designation is required. 32-bit has been on the
>way out for awhile now. If someone wants to make a 32-bit version they
>don't need to follow a distro
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:08:21 -0500, you wrote:
>>Secondly, isn't this what modules are meant for? I'm not sure if there is
>one for JDK on Fedora.
>
>Java 9 modules you mean?
No, Fedora Modules, an alternative to rpms I think.
___
devel mailing list --
Ty Young wrote:
> According to pkgs.org Fedora Rawhide doesn't even have a 32-bit JRE/JDK
> so i'm not sure why the designation is required. 32-bit has been on the
> way out for awhile now. If someone wants to make a 32-bit version they
> don't need to follow a distros naming convention.
While som
33 matches
Mail list logo
