On 4/5/19 00:54, Ty Young wrote:
However, there are serious issues with Fedora 30 Beta Silverblue(and
maybe standard workstation?) with software repositories. On first boot,
software center will display software and updates(and even be
downloadable and installable) however and error message wi
On 05/04/19 00:54, Ty Young wrote:
However, there are serious issues with Fedora 30 Beta Silverblue(and
maybe standard workstation?) with software repositories. On first
boot, software center will display software and updates(and even be
downloadable and installable) however and error messa
On 2019-04-03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 03 April 2019 at 21:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:58 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 at 17:30, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ben C
On 05. 04. 19 7:33, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Starting from Fedora 30, LuxRender repository
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LuxRender/) is retired in favour of
luxcorerender (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luxcorender/)
following upstream.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luxcorerender
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 04:01, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > Well, why can't we have LUKS1-encrypted /boot and enter the encryption
> > password by hand? That's still better than unencrypted /boot.
> >
> What's the point of encrypting /boot? All the executed bits from /boot
> (grub, kernel, and initramdi
Hello,
I maintain an selinux module package for el7, and recently came across
interesting macros [1] and in particular %selinux_requires that hides
the dirty detail and especially one that I missed when I set this up
back then.
Unfortunately, it appears to be provided by one of the packages it
Bu
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:12 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I maintain an selinux module package for el7, and recently came across
> interesting macros [1] and in particular %selinux_requires that hides
> the dirty detail and especially one that I missed when I set this up
> back then.
> I think I found the solution here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux_Independent_Policy
>
> BuildRequires: selinux-policy
> %{?selinux_requires}
>
> This way its expansion can be deferred at rebuild time, I suppose. But
> don't we miss the other BuildRequires tags
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:36 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> > I think I found the solution here:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux_Independent_Policy
> >
> > BuildRequires: selinux-policy
> > %{?selinux_requires}
> >
> > This way its expansion can be deferred a
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I think we
covered everything already, but if you're aware of anything important
we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can
go ahead and run the meeting. Note there *will* be a blocker review
meeting.
Thanks, ev
# F30 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-04-08
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
Fedora 30 blocker review meeting on Monday!
If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the pro
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683197
ACTION: Identify and fix issue
2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691832
ACTION: Upstream rhinstaller maintainers to merge pull request
3. https://bugzilla.
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Branched 20190405.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 2019-04-05 1:39 a.m., Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 04. 19 7:33, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> Starting from Fedora 30, LuxRender repository
>> (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LuxRender/) is retired in favour of
>> luxcorerender (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luxcorender/)
>> following ups
OLD: Fedora-30-20190403.n.0
NEW: Fedora-30-20190405.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 61.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 17/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/24 (i386)
ID: 378368 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378368
ID: 378371 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live
16 matches
Mail list logo
