On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 02. 19 15:07, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > From:
> > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
> > >
> > > When you try to run:
> > >mock -r
On 26. 02. 19 15:08, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:41:56PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 14:24 Miroslav Suchý wrote:
From:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
When you try to run:
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 shell
You will get
* Sérgio Basto:
> OK , I made another patch [1] not touching ./Source/Common/gdcmString.h
> and instead use definition of EOL, I use the default char of template
> ...
>
> [1]
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/sergiomb/rpms/gdcm/blob/master/f/gdcm-2.8.8-dont_use_EOF.patch
That looks much mo
I think those messages are just informational, because nothing uses those
modules to build packages.. or am I wrong?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 14:32 Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> From:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
>
> When you try to run:
> mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 sh
On 27. 02. 19 11:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I think those messages are just informational, because nothing uses those
modules to build packages.. or am I wrong?
It aborts the build.
---
Modular dependency problems with Defaults:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides mo
Todd Zullinger wrote on 2019/02/27 14:00:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
With current koji buildroot I end up with:
+ ls -l /usr/bin/ld /usr/bin/ld.bfd /usr/bin/ld.gold /usr/bin/ldd
--w---. 1 root root 3814880 Feb 27 04:00 /usr/bin/ld
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1841608 Feb 26 15:02 /usr/bin/ld.bfd
-rw
Why people disable the repo, I do not know. I might have a slight notion.
However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular
repositories allowed. It fails with an error similar to what Mirek has
reported. Disabling modular repositories fixed the problem and an upgrade
was possib
On 27. 02. 19 12:30, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
Why people disable the repo, I do not know. I might have a slight notion.
However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular
repositories allowed. It fails with an error similar to what Mirek has reported.
Disabling modular repositori
Dne 27. 02. 19 v 10:57 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> If not, why do we have them in mock, that is certainly not OK.
Mock has them because fedora-repos has them.
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On lundi 25 février 2019 21:49:32 CET you wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.or
Richard Shaw wrote:
> So I'm pretty much out of my league at this point. I can commit the
> Q_FOREACH patch if needed.
please do commit (or at least submit pull request).
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
I have orphaned rubygem-riot and rubygem-rabl as I have no use for them.
Regards,
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.
There is an issue with qpid-proton-0.26.0-1.fc28. It should be in
"stable", but it was blocked. This is creating a problem with qpid packages
in F28. Can someone advise or assist in moving this package to "stable"
ASAP?
--
Regards, Irina.
___
devel maili
Dne 27. 02. 19 v 12:30 Lukas Ruzicka napsal(a):
>
> However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular
> repositories allowed. It fails with an error
> similar to what Mirek has reported. Disabling modular repositories fixed the
> problem and an upgrade was possible, but I
> se
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:20 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 27. 02. 19 v 12:30 Lukas Ruzicka napsal(a):
> >
> > However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular
> > repositories allowed. It fails with an error
> > similar to what Mirek has reported. Disabling modular reposit
On 27. 02. 19 15:34, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On lundi 25 février 2019 21:49:32 CET you wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now
I have a number of qpid packages promoted to "stable" that depend on
qpid-proton-0.26.0-1.f28. However, someone blocked this package from being
promoted, and as a result, updated qpid packages cannot be installed. We
need to either:
- Push qpid-proton-0.26.0-1.f28 to "stable" ASAP, or
- Remove upda
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:18 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > So I'm pretty much out of my league at this point. I can commit the
> > Q_FOREACH patch if needed.
>
> please do commit (or at least submit pull request).
>
Pull request submitted, but it looks like pagure is having i
On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 15:35 -0500, Irina Boverman wrote:
> I have a number of qpid packages promoted to "stable" that depend on
> qpid-proton-0.26.0-1.f28. However, someone blocked this package from
> being promoted, and as a result, updated qpid packages cannot be
> installed. We need to either:
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-02-28 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-02-28 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2019-02-28 1
Let's try this again, but CC'ing the package owners.
On 2019-02-17 9:12 p.m., Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened recently:
> 1. v8 was just retired last week or so,
> 2. R-V8 just ported itself from v8-314 to v8 LTS 6/7.
21 matches
Mail list logo
