Let's try this again, but CC'ing the package owners.

On 2019-02-17 9:12 p.m., Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened recently:
> 1. v8 was just retired last week or so,
> 2. R-V8 just ported itself from v8-314 to v8 LTS 6/7.
> 
> Currently, R-V8 supports both v8-314 and v8, but as the latter fixes several 
> downstream package issues, it is the recommended build target. I expect that 
> eventually they will stop supporting 314 as well. This leaves me in a bit of 
> a pickle as it does not bundle v8 and neither I nor upstream have any plans 
> to build it ourselves.
> 
>> For all of these same reasons, the Node.js SIG opted to carry a bundled
>> copy of v8 in that package as well. I think we should move to have v8
>> considered to be a copylib for all reasonable purposes within Fedora.
> 
> In Debian, the nodejs package provides a stable *shared* v8 library, and the 
> recommended install is against libnode-dev. Unfortunately, in Fedora, while 
> nodejs-devel provides v8.h, it does *not* provide any shared library.
> 
> Is this something we can also do in Fedora, i.e., split out a nodejs-libs 
> subpackage, or similar?
> 

--
Elliott
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to