Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs quite a lot from what's in the buildroot as we haven't had a successful compose since 2019-01-21. This is

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On 01. 02. 19 11:01, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs quite a lot from what's in the buildroot as we haven't had a suc

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:01:26 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs > >>> quite a lot from what's in the

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:01:26 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs > >>> quite a lot from what's in the

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On 01. 02. 19 11:08, Dan Horák wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:01:26 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs quite a lo

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 11:07 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 02. 19 11:01, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo ri

Re: Mass rebuild - emacs broken

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > emacs isn't installable at the moment, so any package that needs emacs > fails to build, eg: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32380321 > DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: Error: DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: Pr

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:16 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2068 > > > > And, after all, those packages shouldn’t be shipped to users. > > This of course means however that users who want to build their own > verions of the applications or whatever can't start from our re

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:59 AM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le jeudi 31 janvier 2019 à 19:52 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:58 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 07:28, Igor Gnatenko < > > > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > Pro

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:46 AM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > If MBI is about hiding build packages I don't see the point and I'm not > interested. It's the opposite - it's about opening build process to others and allowing for collaboration. Instead of doing development by yourself in private, you use

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:58 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 07:28, Igor Gnatenko > > wrote: > >> > >> Problem №1: Build-only packages > >> > >> Rawhide gating makes this much more complicated because builds app

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:28 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > ...snip... > > > COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it. > > Everyone complains that the service is "bad" and that the design is > > "bad" but no one wants to actually con

Re: Mass rebuild - emacs broken

On 2/1/19 12:21 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > > emacs isn't installable at the moment, so any package that needs emacs > fails to build, eg: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=323

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

Le 2019-02-01 13:21, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit : On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:28 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: ...snip... > COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it. > Everyone complains that the service is "bad" and that the design is >

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

Le 2019-02-01 13:17, Josh Boyer a écrit : Fedora is a project, not a venture capital firm. Things get done because people do them, prove they work, get buy-in, and evolve over time. If that means ideas or projects start small and outside existing Fedora infrastructure, that's OK! I think the

Unannounced soname bump - libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8

Hi, there is unannounced soname bump in the buildroot of rawhide and F29: libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8 It breaks several components like gimp, ImageMagick, libabiword etc and packages dependent on them (like emacs, gutenprint...) . These updates are now unpushed, so they did not get into s

Re: Can't figure out how to build flatpaks

01.02.2019, 04:06, "Owen Taylor" : > Thanks for trying it out, and sorry that you are having problems! Thanks Owen! That was super helpful. Got it to build now and submitted the update to bodhi: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2019-a922b417ed Pete __

Re: Mass rebuild - emacs broken

Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 12:21 +0100 schrieb Jan Synacek: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > emacs isn't installable at the moment, so any package that needs > > emacs > > fails to build, eg: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32380321 >

Re: Mass rebuild - emacs broken

Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 13:30 +0100 schrieb Zdenek Dohnal: > On 2/1/19 12:21 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Richard W.M. Jones < > > rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > emacs isn't installable at the moment, so any package that needs > > > emacs > > > fails to build, eg

Re: Mass rebuild - emacs broken

Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 12:21 +0100 schrieb Jan Synacek: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Richard W.M. Jones < > > rjo...@redhat.com > > > wrote: > > > emacs isn't installable at the moment, so any package that needs

Re: Mass rebuild - emacs broken

On 2/1/19 2:37 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 13:30 +0100 schrieb Zdenek Dohnal: >> On 2/1/19 12:21 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM Richard W.M. Jones < >>> rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: emacs isn't installable at the moment, so any pack

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:00 AM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le 2019-02-01 13:17, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > > Fedora is a project, not a venture capital firm. Things get done > > because people do them, prove they work, get buy-in, and evolve over > > time. If that means ideas or projects start smal

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

John Harris wrote: > On Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:32:38 PM EST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> For the last time, please move this to the legal list, a blog, or your >> own tweet stream. This isn't the list for non-lawyers to discuss how they >> think law, licenses and contracts 'work' just bec

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

Dne 01. 02. 19 v 13:21 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > - builds failing due to failure to download packages from official > Fedora mirror dl.fedoraproject.org This is not first time I hear this. So I will open discussion to (again) alter builder's mock config to point to PHX location, which is just

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

Dne 31. 01. 19 v 13:24 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > * > > COPR has been starved of resources for years, which has impaired its > ability to provide reliable service at scale. > Fedora Infrastructure refuses to consider supporting it officially and > Fedora Release Engineering seems to ha

Re: Unannounced soname bump - libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8

Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 14:09 +0100 schrieb Zdenek Dohnal: > Hi, > > there is unannounced soname bump in the buildroot of rawhide and F29: > > libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8 > > It breaks several components like gimp, ImageMagick, libabiword etc > and > packages dependent on them (like e

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 03:26, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 31 janvier 2019 à 19:52 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:58 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 07:28, Igor Gnatenko < > > > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > Proble

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On 2/1/19 2:17 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:01:26 +0100 > > BTW wouldn't it make sense to expand the list of mandatory products, > that must succeed for the whole to compose to succeed, when getting > closer to the release? Like after branch point to have a single product > (x86 e

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 08:17, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:28 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > ...snip... > > > > > COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it. > > > Everyone complains that the service is

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On 2/1/19 4:06 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: ...snip... >>>Separate Koji + Koschei deployed in Fedora infrastructure cloud; >> >> Turns out we are going to be retiring our cloud, so no, this is not a >> place to put it. :) > > Cloud doesn't necessarily mean OpenStack. There are other options.

Re: Mass rebuild - emacs broken

On 2/1/19 5:39 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > I've just resubmitted builds to the f30-rebuild tag for all emacs* > packages that failed because of this. Note that for fixing mass rebuild issues, you can just bump the release and do a normal rawhide build. When the mass rebuild side tag is me

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:23 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > koji-builder, mash and repoview are ready to work without yum ? > There's a pending PR for fixing koji-builder: https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/1117 Mash is dead and not used in infra anymore, so it doesn't matter. RepoView just needs

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:37 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 01. 02. 19 v 13:21 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > > - builds failing to import to COPR distgit (was not a problem before > > dist-git was introduced) > > This is actually new to me. Can you point me to some report? I will try to find a ref

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 4:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>>It is not official build system of Fedora which is not helping with > >>> Problem > >>>№2: Testing of new rpm/koji/mock features/configuration > >>> > >>>

Re: Unannounced soname bump - libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8

On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 15:56 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 14:09 +0100 schrieb Zdenek Dohnal: > > > The maintainer of libwmf should have communicated the soname bump and > possibly ask for help rebuilding the affected packages *before* > pushing or building the

Re: Unannounced soname bump - libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8

> Yeah, my mistake. I was rushing before heading to the airport and > inadvertently bumped the soname upstream. I should have just waited > until the next day. I'll sort it out. Don't worry, we have already fixed everything, including the updates for Fedora 28 and 29. signature.asc Description:

Re: Unannounced soname bump - libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8

Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 19:27 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > > Yeah, my mistake. I was rushing before heading to the airport and > > inadvertently bumped the soname upstream. I should have just waited > > until the next day. I'll sort it out. > > Don't worry, we have already fixed eve

Re: Unannounced soname bump - libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8

Am Freitag, den 01.02.2019, 17:55 + schrieb Caolán McNamara: > Yeah, my mistake. I was rushing before heading to the airport and > inadvertently bumped the soname upstream. I should have just waited > until the next day. I'll sort it out. And now you have broken fast-forwardable release-branc

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Rawhide 20190201.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20190201.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8 tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6 45 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a0ddb153b8 game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el6 The following builds have b

Fedora Rawhide-20190201.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 7 of 47 required tests failed, 7 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 25/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not fa