OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181015.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 102
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 302.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Heads-up that I intend to retire 'gettext-commons' which no longer builds
and I believe is not used by anything in the distro.
If that is not the case please shout out, otherwise I will try to drop it
by the end of this week.
Thanks, Jens
___
devel mail
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/133 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181014.n.0):
ID: 296320 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/296320
ID: 296380 Test
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 7:34 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mo, 15.10.18 18:00, Kamil Paral (kpa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:15 PM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Di, 09.10.18 14:45, Anderson, Charles R (c...@wpi.edu) wrote:
> > >
> > > > > It would be nice
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, at 8:37 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm new on this list. I work on Qubes OS, where Fedora is used as a base
> distribution.
Tangentially: Qubes is very cool and I'm glad you find Fedora useful
as a base system. I work on Fedora CoreOS and have patch
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 15:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 15:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:24:08PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > > I'm pretty sure the original rea
Hi,
in DNF's Copr plugin we are detecting whether you are running in Rawhide or
not, so we can enable you rawhide chroot (or
numbered).
We use this code:
import distro
distro.linux_distribution(full_distribution_name=False)
which returns triplet:
('Fedora', '30', 'Rawhide')
('Fedora', '
On Di, 16.10.18 16:03, Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi,
> in DNF's Copr plugin we are detecting whether you are running in Rawhide or
> not, so we can enable you rawhide chroot (or
> numbered).
>
> We use this code:
>
> import distro
> distro.linux_distribution(full_distribut
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
...
> That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
>
> The Foreman community recently switched away from mailing lists in this
way,
> and
https://theforeman.org/2018/07/discourse-6-months-on-impact-assesment.html
> is really interesting an
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 8:13 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> ...
> > That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
> >
> > The Foreman community recently switched away from mailing lists in this
> way,
> > and
> https://theforeman.org/2018/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:25 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 8:13 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>> ...
>> > That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
>> >
>> > The Foreman community recently switched away from
Dne 16.10.2018 v 16:11 Lennart Poettering napsal(a):
> Quite frankly, you are doing it wrong.
It's not me. It is either author of python-distro or mantainers of
fedora-release.
But you are right, *someone* is doing *something* wrong. I am just trying to
figure what is "someone" and "something".
Il giorno mar 16 ott 2018 alle 16:12, "Gerald B. Cox" ha
scritto:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
...
> That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
>
> The Foreman community recently switched away from mailing lists in
this way,
> and
https://theforeman.org/2
El dom., 14 oct. 2018 a las 16:11, Neal Gompa () escribió:
> > My question is, must we maintain (at rawhide) the 3.3.4 release with the
> > python2 dependencies until that release? Or can I come early with the
> > work and introduce the 4.0.0.dev0 now (and remove python2 dependecies)?
> >
>
> If t
On Di, 16.10.18 16:43, Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Dne 16.10.2018 v 16:11 Lennart Poettering napsal(a):
> > Quite frankly, you are doing it wrong.
>
> It's not me. It is either author of python-distro or mantainers of
> fedora-release.
> But you are right, *someone* is doing *som
Il giorno mar 16 ott 2018 alle 16:39, "Gerald B. Cox" ha
scritto:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:25 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 8:13 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
...
> That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 8:39 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:25 AM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 8:13 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
>>> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> > That's why the general trend is *away*
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:39 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> But RSS really isn't the point of this thread. My point is that Fedora
> should move to Discourse. It's a much better solution for
> discussion. We should publish a timeline and just do it.
Fedora should not "just do it" because "it's a
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:06 AM Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:39 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > But RSS really isn't the point of this thread. My point is that Fedora
> should move to Discourse. It's a much better solution for
> > discussion. We should publish a timeline and jus
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:12 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Did you checkout the Fedora Discourse site and read the Foreman analysis that
> Matt provided?
Unless I'm missing something, I am not sure that either of these
things answers my questions. I am not asking the question "will
switching to Dis
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:30 AM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> I am not saying switching to Discourse is a *bad* idea. I am saying
> that I, at least, would like to see a more serious proposal than
> simply "just do it because it's better". That might require switching
> one list over and seeing how well
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:41 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Council is considering it, and CommOps just started a 2-month
> experiment to see how it goes. It makes sense to me that we wait and
> see how those go before we start considering larger moves. I'm worried
> in particular about larger lists su
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 1:36 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Would changing to:
>
> cdef const digit* D = x.ob_digit
>
> do?
Sadly, no.
Error compiling Cython file:
...
return 1
err[0] = ERR_TYPE
return 0
=
#fedora-meeting-3: Weekly Meeting of the Modularity Working Group
=
Meeting started by nils at 14:00:00 UTC.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meetin
OLD: Fedora-29-20181014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181016.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:51 AM Jerry James wrote:
> Sadly, no.
Here is the challenge, Python aficionados. The attached file,
test.pyx, can be processed like this on Fedora 28 with Cython 0.28.4:
"cythonize -3 test.pyx". That succeeds and generates code that Does
The Right Thing.
On Rawhide wi
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 07:12 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> ...
> > That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
> >
> > The Foreman community recently switched away from mailing lists in this
>
> way,
> > and
>
> https://theforeman.o
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:17 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Rawhide with Cython 0.29rc2, that fails as noted earlier in this
> thread. The name PyLongObject cannot be imported with cimport. How
> does the code need to change to compute the same result?
I should have tried figuring this out for jus
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 13:31 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 07:12 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
> > wrote:
> > ...
> > > That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
> > >
> > > The Foreman community recently switched away fro
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 1:35 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> Ah nice side-thing I just found out, discussion.fedoraproject.org does
> not show *anything* unless I let my browser access this website
> http://discourse-cdn-sjc1.com
>
> That doesn't feel right.
>
Fedora is not hosting its Discourse instanc
On 16.10.2018 19:17, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:51 AM Jerry James wrote:
Sadly, no.
Here is the challenge, Python aficionados. The attached file,
test.pyx, can be processed like this on Fedora 28 with Cython 0.28.4:
"cythonize -3 test.pyx". That succeeds and generates code
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:32 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 07:12 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> From the foreman post, in the comments:
> Email interface does not really work, there should be rather called
> “notifications”. You must visit the site eventually.
>
> I perso
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 1:35 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > Ah nice side-thing I just found out, discussion.fedoraproject.org does
> > not show *anything* unless I let my browser access this website
> > http://discourse-cdn-sjc1.com
> >
> > That
Hi,
To all that may concern (mainly, packagers of things that include font
files).
I’m currently reworking the font automation I created for Fedora 10
years ago. You can get an early peek at the result here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fontpackages-2/
The main objectives of the
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:51:33 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> Yeah, based upon the trial and previous comments I knew it was being
> considered. The point
> of my thread was that many people probably haven't taken the time to
> checkout the Fedora Discourse
> website or read the Foreman analysis t
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:59 AM stan wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:51:33 -0700
> "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
>
> > Yeah, based upon the trial and previous comments I knew it was being
> > considered. The point
> > of my thread was that many people probably haven't taken the time to
> > checkout t
On Tuesday, 16 October 2018 at 19:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 13:31 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 07:12 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller
> > > wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > That's why the general trend is *away* from
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:35:01PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Ah nice side-thing I just found out, discussion.fedoraproject.org does
> not show *anything* unless I let my browser access this website
> http://discourse-cdn-sjc1.com
That's because we're using the hosted option. We could instead deci
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:27:12 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> Press the ? key and a window will pop up with all the keyboard
> shutcuts
I couldn't find a way to move to the next topic from within the current
topic. I had to do a u, then a down arrow, then an enter. That is, I
finished reading a
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 296739 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/296739
ID: 296768 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/
Ben Rosser wrote:
> 2) What's the migration strategy look like? Can users on the mailing
> lists be automatically added to the relevant discourse lists?
Can the mailing lists be transferred from Mailman to Discourse and
continue to be the *same* mailing list, with the same address and the
same li
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:11:21 -0700
stan wrote:
> I couldn't find a way to move to the next topic from within the
> current topic. I had to do a u, then a down arrow, then an enter.
This is wrong. I did u and then had to click on a topic. It didn't
put the focus on the previous topic.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Ben Rosser wrote:
>> 2) What's the migration strategy look like? Can users on the mailing
>> lists be automatically added to the relevant discourse lists?
>
> Can the mailing lists be transferred from Mailman to Discourse and
> continue to b
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:11:21 -0700
stan wrote:
> The other thing, is there a way to put the responses in threaded mode,
> so they are in context like a tree, the way a newsreader would do it.
> The display seems to be a posting time based stream of responses.
> Maybe there is a cue I'm missing th
44 matches
Mail list logo
