On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 01:00:01PM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
>
> Megabytes of RAM are precious. A hard limit of 1M open files per process
> allows each process to eat at least 256MB (1M * sizeof(struct file)
> [linux/fs.h]) of RAM. I
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 4:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> The fact is, the world has moved away from quoted mail with inline replies.
> Top posting rules basically everywhere except hold-out old-school mailing
> lists. Gmail, both on the web and _especially_ on mobile, makes it almost
> impossible
On 08/10/18 18:28 -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 08/10/18 16:43, John Reiser wrote:
>> On 10/8/18 2026 UTC, Zebediah Figura wrote:
>>> On 08/10/18 2000 UTC, John Reiser wrote:
Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
Megabytes of RAM are precious. A hard lim
On 9.10.2018 15:14, Jan Pokorný wrote:
On 08/10/18 18:28 -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
On 08/10/18 16:43, John Reiser wrote:
On 10/8/18 2026 UTC, Zebediah Figura wrote:
On 08/10/18 2000 UTC, John Reiser wrote:
Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
Megabytes of RAM ar
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 11:11:44 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> Hey all,
Hello everyone,
The modularity classroom session is about to begin. You can attend it
using the Bluejeans link below:
> I'll be hosting a Fedora Modularity Classroom targeted at packagers who want
> to
> build multiple versions
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> The fact is, the world has moved away from quoted mail with inline replies.
> Top posting rules basically everywhere except hold-out old-school mailing
> lists. Gmail, both on the web and _especially_ on mobile, makes it almost
> impossible
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 06:58:27AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Completely agree - and discourse is a great solution. It allows for
> RSS feeds and
> email notifications = participation is a click away. Your email inbox
> is no longer cluttered
> with hard to follow threads, nor do you have to w
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:29 PM Michal Konečný wrote:
> Because this is mainly for Steam Proton I support the decision to raise
> the limit only for Workstation. No need to do this on server edition.
> I recommend to also raise this limit for Silverblue edition, because this
> is targeted on commo
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:06 AM Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> One click is too much for my terminal email client via SSH on my
> phone. My email client already supports filtering into separate
> mailboxes for each list and also supports threads shown in a
> hierarchy. If Fedora lists go away in fa
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 04:08:06PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:29 PM Michal Konečný wrote:
>
> > Because this is mainly for Steam Proton I support the decision to raise
> > the limit only for Workstation. No need to do this on server edition.
> > I recommend to also raise
On 10/9/18 0810 UTC, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
AFAICT, the TCP receive buffer size is about 200 KB per socket.
With the current nfile=4096, it looks like a single process
can already consume 200 KB * 4096 = ~800 MB of RAM just by
using TCP sockets.
IOW, does the nfiles limit make a real world
Hi,
A heads-up that I am planning to move Haskell executables to static linking
in F30.
This to improve the experience with the new ghc module: currently most of
the Haskell executables (except hscolour and hedgewars I believe) are
dynamically linked which conflicts
with modular ghc, making it pai
Due bodhi not use 3 day to stable but 8 in F29 before freeze
I 'd push to stable:
clamav https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-847fe2ed61
and the fixes of FTBFS:https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
018-119595346chttps://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-
f27f7d
On Di, 09.10.18 14:45, Anderson, Charles R (c...@wpi.edu) wrote:
> > It would be nice if somebody managed to find where this is patched in
> > Debian. Because I somewhat doubt that they made this change without a
> > proper discussion. And Debian is very much server oriented.
>
> Can we not have
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181006.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181009.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 276
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 31.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 13/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181006.n.0):
ID: 291273 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/
On 10/8/18 3:43 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 08 October 2018 at 12:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:47:13PM +0200, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
[...]
Also, don't forget secure boot, kinda a big deal
Yeah, secure boot kills the whole
Greetings!
I've been bitten twice in the past week by dependencies of my packages
dropping the Python 2 RPMs, presumably due to the Fedora 30 change[0].
Note that the change does state that the package should not be dropped
if other packages depend on them.
On that note, I do know how to check i
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:09 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> I've been bitten twice in the past week by dependencies of my packages
> dropping the Python 2 RPMs, presumably due to the Fedora 30 change[0].
>
> Note that the change does state that the package should not be dropped
> if othe
On 10/3/18 9:53 PM, Christopher wrote:
> I'm still very confused about how to do modular packaging in Fedora. I
> don't know:
>
> 1. How do I create a module for a new Fedora package?
> 2. How do I create a module for my existing non-modular Fedora package?
> 3. How do I declare BuildRequires on m
On 10/8/18 4:42 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Various people replied, both here and on reddit [1]. Thank you all!
>
> Short summary:
> works (possibly with minor glitches): 27
> works but with occasional regressions in some kernel versions: 3
> unusable: 10
If I may piggy-back on this
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 13/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 291421 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291421
ID: 291429 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedor
On 10/9/18 8:28 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Due bodhi not use 3 day to stable but 8 in F29 before freeze
> I 'd push to stable:
> clamav https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-847fe2ed61
> and the fixes of FTBFS:https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
> 018-119595346chttps://b
On 9.10.2018 23:08, Randy Barlow wrote:
Greetings!
I've been bitten twice in the past week by dependencies of my packages
dropping the Python 2 RPMs, presumably due to the Fedora 30 change[0].
If you see something like that again, please report that directly to the
package maintainer who remo
24 matches
Mail list logo
