Could you please drop the dependency on GCC or revert the change? I
don't want have GCC on my system. I have never needed it so far and I
can't imagine I would need it because of this change.
Vít
Dne 29.11.2017 v 13:00 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> Hello everyone,
>
> as of now, Annobin[0] has bee
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 08:01:24PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:37:33 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 5:16 AM, bugzilla redhat com wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529276
> > >
> > > Bug ID: 1529276
> > >
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:13:15PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> [gtg]
> gtg-0.3.1-14.fc28.noarch requires python-liblarch >= 0:2.1.0
> gtg-0.3.1-14.fc28.noarch requires python-liblarch_gtk
Hmm, it seems that the python2 version of liblarch was dropped in
favour of the python3 v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 10:26 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Could you please drop the dependency on GCC or revert the change? I
> don't want have GCC on my system. I have never needed it so far and I
> can't imagine I would need it because of this change
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:13:15PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> [pulp]
> python2-pulp-oid_validation-2.14.0-1.fc28.noarch requires python-rhsm
> python2-pulp-repoauth-2.14.0-1.fc28.noarch requires python-rhsm
> [pulp-rpm]
> pulp-rpm-handlers-2.14.0-1.fc28.noarch requires
Hi,
this is probably kind of off-topic, but I think there could be a
someone, who encountered it too. Does anyone please know, in which
Fedora user group I need to be to be able to write to Fedora wiki and
where I can be added to such user group? I would like to update printing
pages, but sadly I
For me, Fedora marketing was the group to do this - though seems other
subprojects such as PackageMaintainers, magazine, documentation should
also work:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki
Benson
On 01/02/2018 05:05 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
this is probably kind of off-top
Hi Zdohny,
Are you logged in? I can do that, so I guess you should be able to change
it as well. Or send me link, I can try whether it is same or not for
specific wiki page.
On 2.1.2018 16:05, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is probably kind of off-topic, but I think there could be a
> someo
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:05:11PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is probably kind of off-topic, but I think there could be a
> someone, who encountered it too. Does anyone please know, in which
> Fedora user group I need to be to be able to write to Fedora wiki and
> where I can be ad
On 01/02/2018 04:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:05:11PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is probably kind of off-topic, but I think there could be a
>> someone, who encountered it too. Does anyone please know, in which
>> Fedora user group I need to be to
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:05:11PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> this is probably kind of off-topic, but I think there could be a
> someone, who encountered it too. Does anyone please know, in which
> Fedora user group I need to be to be able to write to Fedora wiki and
> where I can be added to su
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 24/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180101.n.0):
ID: 183522 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://open
On 12/26/2017 12:23 PM, Wells, Roger K. wrote:
> Small inconvenience but new and annoying:
> Machine is Thinkpad x260
> uname -a: Linux rwells-x260 4.14.7-300.fc27.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 18 16:06:12
> UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Desktop: Gnome 3.26.4-1.fc27.x86_64
>
> When the lid is
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 23/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180101.n.0):
ID: 183522 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://open
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I need/want/would like to build new node 6 for EL6, but gcc is too old.
For that reason, I'd like to use devtoolset-4-gcc, but the build fails
(obviously) because the pa
I have orphaned some Java packages. These two were used to support
jnormaliz, which used to be part of the normaliz package. It is now a
separate project, and I don't use it, so I am not packaging it. If
somebody would like to do so, you will want to take up these two
packages:
- balloontip (bal
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Peter Robinson
>> wrote:
> I need/want/would like to build new node 6 for EL6, but gcc is too old.
> For that reason, I'd like to use devto
17 matches
Mail list logo
