On 19/12/17 01:11, Thomas Daede wrote:
On 12/18/2017 03:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Does anyone read this as Mozilla admitting that they messed up?
This was published today:
https://blog.mozilla.org/firefox/update-looking-glass-add/
It's certainly an improvement on their previous efforts t
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Is there a fundamental difference between this and, if, say, similar
> functionality were in the FF 57 release itself?
If Firefox itself contained such adware, that would make the entire browser
unusable.
Kevin Kofler
__
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> It was brought up elsewhere that Chrome/Chromium in the past has done
> something worse in scope, silently downloading an add-on to that turns
> on & listens to your microphone. Ostensibly to detect the "ok google"
> keyword, but since its a closed source add-on can you
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, not quite. I installed Firefox rather a long time ago on this
> system. Again I can't prove it, but at that time I believe this
> question and preference referred *only* to 'data collection'. However,
> since then, a new sub-preference seems to have appeared, labelled
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:19:26PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 18 December 2017 at 13:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:55:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> I think we should be concerned by this kind of behaviour on the part of
> >> the supplier of our def
Chris Adams wrote:
> I thought that this was actually a violation of the packaging policies,
> but I can't seem to find it now; I only see the restriction on software
> the requires downloads to be useful. I think simply requiring Mozilla
> to change their policies is unacceptable, as this still d
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Conversely though in a Flatpak world though, we would be moving much
> closer the model of Windows/OS-X/Android where Mozilla has a more direct
> way to push software to users, without a OS vendor arbitrarily rebuilding
> & repackaging stuff.
And that is one big reason
Missing expected images:
Server boot x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server dvd x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 50/104 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171218.n.0):
ID: 181259 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet
Hello Everyone,
with NetworkManager-1.0 release exactly three years ago, libnm-glib
library got deprecated in favor of a newer library, libnm. Throughout
those years libnm-glib received very little love, fell behind the
feature parity with libnm and was left with bugs unfixed.
While the old libra
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
>
> * switchboard-plug-networking & wingpanel-indicator-network
> Upstream went unresponsive, pull requests stalled. [2] [3]
>
Upstream has already merged the pull request for wingpanel-indicator-network,
and there are comments from upstrea
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:16 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, not quite. I installed Firefox rather a long time ago on this
> system. Again I can't prove it, but at that time I believe this
> question and preference referred *only* to 'data collection'. However,
> since then, a new sub-preferen
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 09:47 -0500, John Florian wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:16 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, not quite. I installed Firefox rather a long time ago on this
> > system. Again I can't prove it, but at that time I believe this
> > question and preference referred *only*
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
>
> None the less, if we consider Fedora maintainers to be adding value via the
> packaging process, over having users get their browser direct from Mozilla,
> then I do still think it is desirable to be able to opt-out of this feature
>
Hey all,
Igor is building pkgconf-1.3.90 for Rawhide now, which is the beta for
the upcoming pkgconf-1.4.0.
This is a significant feature update with some behavior changes,
including improved behavior for natively running on Windows as well as
cross-targeting to Windows with our MinGW toolchain.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> pkgconf will also now include a pc(7) man page that fully describes
> the pkgconfig .pc file format and how it is processed by pkgconf.
Correction, this is pc(5), not pc(7). Oops.
pkg.m4 is in section 7, though. :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Modularity is Dead, Long Live Modularity!
=
See this post in glorious technicolor
at:https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/modularity-dead-long-live-modularity/
Summary
- ---
Fedora’s Modularity initi
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 13:43 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
>
> New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20171217.n.0):
All of these are due to a bunch of new SELinux denials showing up for
journalctl:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527684
> Installed system
> Chris Adams wrote:
>
> This is the very least that Fedora ought to do, and it has to be done
> immediately!
>
> In addition, for future Fedora releases, the default browser ought to be
> changed to one with a more trustworthy upstream, e.g.:
> * QupZilla (soon to be Falkon) [https://www.qupzi
18 matches
Mail list logo
