> Chris Adams wrote:
>
> This is the very least that Fedora ought to do, and it has to be done
> immediately!
>
> In addition, for future Fedora releases, the default browser ought to be
> changed to one with a more trustworthy upstream, e.g.:
> * QupZilla (soon to be Falkon) [https://www.qupzilla.com/],
> * GNOME Web / Epiphany [https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web],
> * Midori [http://midori-browser.org/] (the WebKit2 branch snapshots that are
> already in Fedora).
>
> In the interest of desktop integration, I would actually suggest using a
> different browser on different Spins, matching the shipped desktop
> environment (QupZilla on KDE and LXQt, GNOME Web on GNOME/Workstation,
> Midori on the others).
>
> That said, QupZilla, while being a Qt application, actually has better GNOME
> integration than Firefox: It uses the system icon theme out of the box, it
> has native look&feel and native file dialogs thanks to QGnomePlatform, and
> there is even an optional plugin to make it use GNOME Keyring.
>
> In addition, using a browser adapted to the desktop would also provide a
> much more integrated experience to our users:
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Mozilla_and...
> https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/fedora-kde/msg13235.html
>
> Kevin Kofler
IMO Going Back to SeaMonkey would be a Better Bet than any of the following
Browsers you mentioned .
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
