Hi,
I'd like to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Jaromir
Capik (jcapik). I've been trying to contact him through a bugzilla, but
haven't received a reply in over two weeks:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494142
I also attempted to contact him directly using email on 2
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Dear fellow Fedora developers!
> I was puzzled by this after upgrading from F25 to F26 on a headless
> machine with a pretty minimal set of packages installed (i.e. almost
> no libraries related to Xorg or mesa). The upgrade b
# F27 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2017-10-09
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! There are currently some proposed release blockers,
so let's have a Fedora 27 blocker review meeting.
If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or
a
Hi, we'll be heavily focusing on F27 Final testing and I don't know about
any urgent topic to discuss, so I propose we cancel this meeting. If you
have any topics, please send them to test list and we'll discuss them there.
Thanks,
Kamil
___
test-announc
Dne 7.10.2017 v 18:45 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>>> I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual refrain
>>> here is that we should *try* new things and have the a
- Mail original -
De: "Vít Ondruch"
> This does not necessarily work in case when subpackages are using
> different versions from main package. But if we always increased
> release, it would not hurt ... OTOH, it would not solve the typical
> issues with 1.0.0.rc1 updated to 1.0.0
T
Sadly, no. It's been ages I don't see or hear anything from him.
Regards,
Silvia
2017-10-09 8:24 GMT+01:00 Ondřej Lysoněk :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Jaromir
> Capik (jcapik). I've been trying to contact him through a bugzilla, but
> haven't received
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:17:31PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> The killing of logged out user processes, without record and with
> no option to disable it after compilation in release 230 was another
> one.
Oh, that's utter, unffettered BS. That feature was there from the
beginning. v230
Also, it might be trash for you but for someone else it might be a very
useful tool or even his or her favourite programme for a given task. So
please, be respectful to others' preferences or needs.
Cheers,
Silvia
2017-09-11 2:00 GMT+01:00 Globe Trotter :
> Very good point. I think that the o
On 9 October 2017 at 11:30, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:17:31PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > The killing of logged out user processes, without record and with
> > no option to disable it after compilation in release 230 was another
> > one.
>
> Oh, that's utter, unff
On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 21:27:40 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a
> > repository just fine.
> > I'm sorry I can't help you more.
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert-André
>
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:51 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> I don't see a urw-base35-fonts SRPM in my RawHide ... has it
> been packaged?
>
Yes, it's in the Rawhide already:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/urw-base35-fonts
My mirror only fires weekly, but it seens ... hasty to retire
> a package
Hi,
I'd like to announce the beginning of a new SIG: OpenStack.
During these last years, I've been more or less maintaining OpenStack
clients, and I'd like to pass over
that (burden) to a SIG.
OpenStack clients/libraries are quite tied to each other, so it is
difficult to maintain them without pr
The only thing in Fedora using libfwupd is currently gnome-software,
which will also be rebuilt by me (as also the upstream maintainer).
Any problems, yell.
Richard.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 78/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 154117 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154117
ID: 154118 Test: x86_64 Server-b
So, I have tried to rebuild 'hylafax+' with 'urw-base35-fonts' and it
passed:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22352204
I suggest we rebase it newer version (5.5 -> 6.0.6 -- the latest stable
release is already 5 years old -- http://www.hylafax.org/content/Download),
rebuild it
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 01:04:55PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> maybe you did not understand that he is talking about "DefaultTasksMax=512"
> which is systemd, affects all services and was *in the meantime* raised
Surely this is one of the things a system administrator is expected to
tune based
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017, at 01:26 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> At a certain point, if you want/need to do these things, it is better
> to burn it from the ground and come up with a new packaging system
> (and relearn all the second system problems involved with that).
I actually put code behind
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:38:07PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> oh yeah, your mysqld tests surely include "and now me make the 800
> connections allowed in my.cnf"? i doubt!
As an end-user testing my [organization's] applications on a new/beta
distro release? This is something I'll absolutely t
Is anyone having problems with the output of fedora-review?
I've done two reviews [1] with a lot of false positives:
* I get a notice of header files must be in -devel subpackage because
fedora-review considers header files in -debugsource subpackage to
be wrong
* I get a long list of di
On lundi 9 octobre 2017 17:55:28 CEST Mattia Verga wrote:
> Is anyone having problems with the output of fedora-review?
>
> I've done two reviews [1] with a lot of false positives:
>
> * I get a notice of header files must be in -devel subpackage because
> fedora-review considers header fil
- Mail original -
De: "David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]"
> * Regarding the font family names and subpackages -- it's another mess.
> Not just in Fedora (the FPG for fonts are really outdated), but generally
> everywhere.
Since I wrote those, I'd like to qualify this:
1. Fedora basic packaging p
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 16/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 154341 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154341
ID: 154353 Test: x86_64 Server-dv
Hi,
I'm updating libxc in rawhide to version 4.0.1. This update contains a
soname bump, so rebuilds of dependent packages will be necessary:
- cp2k
- gpaw
- elk
- exciting
I don't think there have been any API changes, so the rebuilds should go
smoothly. I'll take care of the rebuilds.
--
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2017-10-10 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us o
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:17 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
wrote:
> So, I have tried to rebuild 'hylafax+' with 'urw-base35-fonts' and it
> passed:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22352204
>
> I suggest we rebase it newer version (5.5 -> 6.0.6 -- the latest stable
> release is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/10/17 04:13 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 21:27:40 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and ad
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 27
Modular Server Beta.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, October 12th, 2017 at
17:00 UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
[1] https://apps.
28 matches
Mail list logo
