Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

Am 15. August 2017 16:55:02 MESZ schrieb Ben Rosser : >I would go so far as to say answering the questionnaire, or at least >giving >a brief statement about your goals for the position, should be a >*requirement* for running for an elected position in the project. Hi Ben, I like your idea of prov

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik : >I am personally not convinced this will help as the set of questions >in Questionnaire is almost the same for the last several elections, as >we copy them from one elections to another. So, candidates can prepare >them self in advance even now.

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > So can we discuss it now once more without the affiliation to systemd? > The fact is that we still do not have any other replacement except > firewalls. But do we need one? > IIRC, in the past discussion there was quite a lot of people argu

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

On 08/16/2017 11:37 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > >> >> So can we discuss it now once more without the affiliation to systemd? >> The fact is that we still do not have any other replacement except >> firewalls. But do we need one? >> > > IIRC,

introducing fed-install: easy way to install packages from koji and other releases

Hello Fedora, for some time, I am using rawhide as my main system. I always struggled with installation of non-rawhide packages: installing stable kernel, downgrading to a non-broken package, reinstalling package which is no longer available in repositories... I thought that somebody had to write

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:35 +, Petr Pisar wrote: this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter Any advice is welcome . Thanks, [1]  https://copr-be.cloud.fedorapr

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:35 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] > DEBUG util.py:450: Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > DEBUG util.py:450: Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > > Any

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:55:14PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > Yes, because it's a Fedora change. Not EPEL one. > An

mock epel-5 target build fails on Fedora 26

On an up to date Fedora 26, attempting a mock build targeting EPEL 5, specifically "-r epel-5-x86_64" (on Fedora x86_64) fails thusly: DEBUG util.py:606: child environment: None DEBUG util.py:533: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '- M', '61336fe75098477eaace9727c7cec7c1',

Re: mock epel-5 target build fails on Fedora 26

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > On an up to date Fedora 26, attempting a mock build targeting EPEL 5, > specifically "-r epel-5-x86_64" (on Fedora x86_64) fails thusly: Well /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg says this (wrongly I believe): # By default Mock use simple chroot

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 14:38 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:55:14PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] > > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpre

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 14:38 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:55:14PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] >> > DEBUG util.py:450: Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter >> > D

Arduino in Fedora

In attempting to figure out why the lulzbot-marlin-firmware was not being compiled properly, I noticed that the arduino packages in Fedora were a bit out of date. To remedy this, I made updated versions of them and put them in my copr here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/arduino-1.8/

Re: Arduino in Fedora

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > In attempting to figure out why the lulzbot-marlin-firmware was not > being compiled properly, I noticed that the arduino packages in Fedora > were a bit out of date. To remedy this, I made updated versions of them > and put them in my copr he

Re: Arduino in Fedora

On 08/16/2017 09:09 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > For reference there's a bunch of history on this bug about getting it > up to date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316315 Thanks. I give lots of credit to Gianluca's work on the 1.6 branch, most of that was still applicable in the 1.8

Re: How to request new branch?

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: > > $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 > > And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: > > "The branch in PDC was created. You may now create the branch in Pagure using > git.

Re: Arduino in Fedora

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > On 08/16/2017 09:09 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> For reference there's a bunch of history on this bug about getting it >> up to date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316315 > > Thanks. I give lots of credit to Gianluca's work o

Re: mock epel-5 target build fails on Fedora 26

Dne 16.8.2017 v 14:48 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Sam Varshavchik > mailto:mr...@courier-mta.com>> wrote: > > On an up to date Fedora 26, attempting a mock build targeting EPEL > 5, specifically "-r epel-5-x86_64" (on Fedora x86_64) fails thusly: > > > Well

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On 16 August 2017 at 03:38, Till Maas wrote: > Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik : > > >I am personally not convinced this will help as the set of questions > >in Questionnaire is almost the same for the last several elections, as > >we copy them from one elections to another. So

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

On 16 August 2017 at 05:44, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On 08/16/2017 11:37 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > > >> > >> So can we discuss it now once more without the affiliation to systemd? > >> The fact is that we still do not have any other replace

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On 08/16/2017 05:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 16 August 2017 at 03:38, Till Maas > wrote: Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik mailto:jku...@redhat.com>>: >I am personally not convinced this will help as the set of questions

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On 16 August 2017 at 13:02, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/16/2017 05:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> >> >> On 16 August 2017 at 03:38, Till Maas > opensou...@till.name>> wrote: >> >> Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik >> mailto:jku...@redhat.com>>: >> >> >I am

Need reviewer for golang based packages

Hi all, I need reviewer who is good at golang rpm packages because its reviewer asks me to have more reviewers who is good at golang rpm packages in Fedora. Could someone help review the following RPM packaging? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463492 Regards, Tomo __

Re: Need reviewer for golang based packages

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:46:26AM +0900, Tomofumi Hayashi wrote: > Hi all, Hello, > > I need reviewer who is good at golang rpm packages because its > reviewer asks me to have more reviewers who is good at golang rpm > packages in Fedora. > Could someone help review the following RPM packaging?

Re: git push fails for new packages

i still get the message koji not in list errors, some works... some doesn't ... BuildError: package nuvola-app-mixcloud not in list for tag f25-updates-candidate BuildError: package nuvola-app-google-play-music not in list for tag f26-updates-candidate BuildError: package nuvola-app-google-play-

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

Kevin Kofler writes: > Dave Love wrote: >> You'll find Dominik was correct if you try it. > > If you are talking about the missing RPM AutoProvides: > Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) > does wonders. I mean you need to get the soname right and ensure that you have everything implemented in the re

Re: git push fails for new packages

On 08/16/2017 11:18 AM, Martin Gansser wrote: > i still get the message koji not in list errors, some works... some doesn't > ... > > BuildError: package nuvola-app-mixcloud not in list for tag > f25-updates-candidate > BuildError: package nuvola-app-google-play-music not in list for tag > f26-

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017, Jan Kurik wrote: > I do not see the conflict of interests here. Justin is one of > volunteers (for several election cycles already) who contacts all > candidates at the beginning of Campaign period providing them with > instructions how to work with CommOps team to publish the

f27 branch of retired package (was: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package)

-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:46 PM Subject: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package To: dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/va

Re: f27 branch of retired package (was: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package)

Am 16.08.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:46 PM Subject: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package To: dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' p

Re: f27 branch of retired package (was: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package)

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hello, > > I just received the notification above and I'm very surprised. I > retired this package before f26 was branched because of > incompatibility with recent Varnish releases. > > The old pkgdb web page shows that: > > https://admin

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On 08/09/2017 05:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently > fails to link to atlas: > > + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I > examples lib/gsl.cmxa examples/blas_ex.cmx -o examples/blas_ex.nati

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

Dave Love wrote: > Kevin Kofler writes: >> If you are talking about the missing RPM AutoProvides: >> Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) >> does wonders. > > I mean you need to get the soname right and ensure that you have > everything implemented in the replacement library. Only the soname of the P

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:57:28 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dave Love wrote: > > > Kevin Kofler writes: > >> If you are talking about the missing RPM AutoProvides: > >> Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) > >> does wonders. > > > > I mean you need to get the soname right and ensure that you have > > e

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On 08/16/2017 04:34 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > On 08/09/2017 05:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently >> fails to link to atlas: >> >> + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I >> examples li

Re: How to request new branch?

- Original Message - > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: > > > > $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 > > > > And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: > > > > "The branch in PDC was created. You ma

Fedora Rawhide-20170815.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 34/137 (x86_64), 17/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170814.n.0): ID: 130199 Test: i386 universal install_packag

Re: How to request new branch?

On 08/16/2017 04:19 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: >>> According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: >>> >>> $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 >>> >>> And the ticket [2] was closed with a me

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-08-17 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-08-17 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2017-08-17 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2017-08-17 1