Alec Leamas wrote:
> On a sidenote, I think the original Swedish proverb rather is
> something like "Once is never, twice is once and three times is a
> habit."
That's not how I've heard it, but it's not like there's a
standardization organization for proverbs.
Björn Persson
pgpXXjZ9FlZsy.pgp
D
Il giorno sab, 01/07/2017 alle 06.29 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha
scritto:
> While there is no automatic upgrade to Samba AD is planned,
> we'd like to ensure smooth distribution upgrade.
Does this mean?
I have on Fedora 25 + samba 4.5.x rebuild with this spec modify (and
some other):
> -%global
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 12:45:51AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > Clearly what I meant was "any future non-backwards-compatible major
>> > Python release". Maybe *right now* you don't expect there to
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 22/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170628.n.0):
ID: 115789 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170630.n.0):
ID: 115973 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/115973
ID: 115989 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop
On 1 July 2017 at 03:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 12:07 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Even if a 4.0 does happen, the magnitude of the change relative to the
>> preceding 3.x release is expected to be comparable to that between any
>> given 3.x and 3.x+1 release, so it wouldn'
