Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 26
Final.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, July 6th, 2017 at 17:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
Before each public release Developm
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for the Fedora 26
Final Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, July 6th, 2017 at 19:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Final
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> First, I appreciate the work that goes into maintaining the R ecosystem. But
> there is now a problem that I don't think people would allow in other
> languages. Namely, the recently pushed R-3.4 update breaks the whole world.
> Some
Another question about the 'buildroot override'.
I have created a new buildroot-override from MUMPS-5.1.1.
Inside it i rebuilt a new version of coin-or-Ipopt:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-95ad16b7a5
Other packages (coin-or-OS, coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Bonmin) depend by
coi
- Original Message -
> From: "Antonio Trande"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 6:05:57 PM
> Subject: Re: How to use a buildroot-override
>
> Another question about the 'buildroot override'.
>
> I have created a new buildroot-override from MUMPS-5.1.1.
>
On 06/30/2017 06:10 PM, Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Antonio Trande"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 6:05:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: How to use a buildroot-override
>>
>> Another question about the 'buildroot override'.
>>
>> I have
- Original Message -
> From: "Antonio Trande"
> To: "Pavel Valena" , "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 6:14:37 PM
> Subject: Re: How to use a buildroot-override
>
> On 06/30/2017 06:10 PM, Pavel Valena wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message
From: Matthew Miller
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: R 3.4 update
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> First, I appreciate the work that goes into maintaining the R ecosystem. But
> there is
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 04:27:25PM +, Globe Trotter wrote:
> FWIW, here is another example where this caused problems:
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/44834208/479426
>
> --
> Respectfully, the above package is not from R, but R-forge. If
> contributors who are not part of the R ecosystem do not
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-06-30)
===
Meeting started by maxamillion at 16:01:41 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-06-30/fesco.2017-06-30-16.01.log.html
.
Meeting summa
On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 12:07 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 30 June 2017 at 09:24, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:50 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
> > >
> > > AW> Right, that's a good point. *Why* exactly do we want to go
OLD: Fedora-26-20170628.n.1
NEW: Fedora-26-20170630.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 7
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 84/128 (x86_64), 17/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 115145 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/126 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26 Beta 1.4):
ID: 115035 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/115035
ID: 115108 Test: x86_64 univer
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> Right, that's a good point. *Why* exactly do we want to go to all
> AW> the trouble involved in making a switchover from 'python-foo'
> AW> meaning 'the Python 2 module called foo' to meaning 'the Python 3
> AW> module
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/128 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170628.n.1):
ID: 115476 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/115476
ID: 115568 Test: x86_64 univ
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Clearly what I meant was "any future non-backwards-compatible major
> Python release". Maybe *right now* you don't expect there to be one,
> but I'm sure there was probably a point during Python 1's lifetime at
> which no-one expected there to be a backwards-incompatible Py
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 12:45:51AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Clearly what I meant was "any future non-backwards-compatible major
> > Python release". Maybe *right now* you don't expect there to be one,
> > but I'm sure there was probably a point during Python 1's life
Il giorno gio, 29/06/2017 alle 15.53 +0200, Jan Kurik ha scritto:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Samba AD =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Samba_AD
>
This is a good news.
I have implemented on Fedora 25 a samba 4.5.x rebuild with dc enable +
bind dns + dncpd + ntpd
How I can help
On la, 01 heinä 2017, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno gio, 29/06/2017 alle 15.53 +0200, Jan Kurik ha scritto:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Samba AD =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Samba_AD
This is a good news.
I have implemented on Fedora 25 a samba 4.5.x rebuild with dc enable +
On 01/07/17 01:17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 12:45:51AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Spot on.
There is a Swedish proverb. I don't know whether an English version
exists, but in translation it is: One time is no time; two times is a
habit. Since the Python API h
22 matches
Mail list logo