Fedora 25 mock failure

2017-06-04 Thread Florian Weimer
On Fedora 25 x86-64, I get a strange mock failure: $ mock -r fedora-25-x86_64 --scrub all $ mock -r fedora-25-x86_64 --init warning: /var/lib/mock/fedora-25-x86_64/root/var/cache/dnf/updates-87ad44ec2dc11249/packages/util-linux-2.28.2-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fdb

Re: Directory permissions for games

2017-06-04 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03-06-17 18:46, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. Crawl is not correctly working because of lack of directory permissions. How can i correctly/safely set that permissions for saving data files of Crawl? Bugzilla ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458489 Affected package: h

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

2017-06-04 Thread Adam Samalik
This enables us to have branches that make more sense for individual packages - so we can save work by having just one branch for one version acrsoss releases, or to offer more versions or "streams". A slide [1] from my recent talk demonstrates the possibilities - and also shows why branches are no

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > With pagure becoming a front-end to dist-git, I have been wondering about the > future of the packager group. Is there some place I could read about this? The rest of the email didn't make much sense without this context I am m

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Michal Schorm
> Is there some place I could read about this? The rest of the email > didn't make much sense without this context I am missing. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb -- Michal Schorm Associate Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:15:19PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > > Is there some place I could read about this? The rest of the email > > didn't make much sense without this context I am missing. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb Still unclear. As far as I've

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Tom Hughes
On 04/06/17 13:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:15:19PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: Is there some place I could read about this? The rest of the email didn't make much sense without this context I am missing. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedTo

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-LibIDN (master). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

2017-06-04 Thread notifications
From ed846ac5495b2f70fdacea932a5c903d7e2da95e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 15:10:35 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- perl-Net-LibIDN.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-Net-LibIDN.spec b/perl-Net-LibIDN.sp

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:10:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 04/06/17 13:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:15:19PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > >>>Is there some place I could read about this? The rest of the email > >>>didn't make much sense without this context I am

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Tom Hughes
On 04/06/17 14:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:10:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: On 04/06/17 13:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:15:19PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: Is there some place I could read about this? The rest of the email didn't make m

Testing request: libdb and F26 upgrades

2017-06-04 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! So as you may have read, F26 Beta was held up by a tricky bug which causes upgrades to hang in some situations: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397087 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394862 There are updates in F24, F25 and F26 at present which we hope should

Re: Testing request: libdb and F26 upgrades

2017-06-04 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 04.06.2017 um 18:44 schrieb Adam Williamson: There are updates in F24, F25 and F26 at present which we hope should resolve this bug without causing other problems, but the code in question is quite sensitive so we want to be as sure as possible that it's good to go. The updates to -21 libdb

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile (master). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

2017-06-04 Thread notifications
From 55230cde6213e1ab2857600b9490315028cd0349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 19:09:16 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-Mojolicious-Plugi

Atheros QCA9377 dual functionality and Fedora 25

2017-06-04 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Hi, I'm using Fedora 25 on Lenovo 510S idepad. The Wifi/BT chip combo is Atheros QCA9377. Connecting to Wifi works great (tested 2.4 and 5Ghz). Connecting to Bluetooth devices works great. However - when I try to stream anything using the Wifi (to get the stream) to a Bluetooth speaker - the

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:42:20PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 04/06/17 14:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:10:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > On 04/06/17 13:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:15:19PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > > >

Re: Atheros QCA9377 dual functionality and Fedora 25

2017-06-04 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > I have been looking around and all I could find is some firmware files to > enable Wifi but nothing about Bluetooth (BTW: what is the RPM package which > includes the QCA9377 firmware files?). The driver may load more than one binary files

[Test-Announce] 2017-06-05 @ 1600 UTC ** F26 Blocker Review Meeting

2017-06-04 Thread Mike Ruckman
# F26 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2017-06-05 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's that time of the week again - Blocker Review time! Last week we were still blocked on the libdb bug (please test! Adam sent an email with information on it). Currently, tha

Fedora 26 compose report: 20170604.n.0 changes

2017-06-04 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-26-20170603.n.0 NEW: Fedora-26-20170604.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 7 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 07:24:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:42:20PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 04/06/17 14:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:10:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > On 04/06/17 13:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >

[Test-Announce] 2017-06-05 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2017-06-04 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2017-06-05 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! Sorry for the late notice, but we haven't met for a while, and it'd probably be good to check in on t