Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:52:22PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > With the deprecation of pkgdb2, pagure will make it even easier to give > > someone > > access to a package, if someone wants to help you maintain

Re: python-dnf questions

2017-06-03 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 12:50 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Does anyone know of a mailing list/forum/etc. for DNF Python API > questions? #yum on freenode, rpm-ecosys...@lists.rpm.org > > -- > ===

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread James Hogarth
On 3 Jun 2017 8:33 am, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" wrote: On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:52:22PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > With the deprecation of pkgdb2, pagure will make it even easier to give someone > > access to a

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:31:50PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > If I had the opportunity to choose the setup I think I'd lean towards, > anyone can authenticate to the dist-git via pagure (I'd even lean towards a > full open setup via oauth etc and not fedora account only). Anyone can PR > that is

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > The packager group is currently used for a few things: > - tracking purpose, it's one of our biggest groups and also one of the most > active > - members of the packager group can do official package review > - members of the p

Directory permissions for games

2017-06-03 Thread Antonio Trande
Hi all. Crawl is not correctly working because of lack of directory permissions. How can i correctly/safely set that permissions for saving data files of Crawl? Bugzilla ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458489 Affected package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpm

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Randy Barlow
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 21:42 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > What do you think? Bodhi also currently cares about users being in the packager group to decide whether they can create buildroot overrides (I think, not actually 100% sure). It uses pkgdb to decide whether a user has access to create

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Randy Barlow
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 09:32 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Bodhi I believe also check this, maybe Randy could confirm this. I think I just answered this in another e-mail. Let me know if you need more info. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-06-04)

2017-06-03 Thread till
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Orphaned Packages in branched (2017-06-04)

2017-06-03 Thread till
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Review swaps

2017-06-03 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello! I've got a couple of easy python packages to review: Review Request: python-fypp - Fortran preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431637 Review Request: python-mmtf - A decoding library for the macromolecular transmission format (MMTF) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 03:12:48PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 21:42 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > What do you think? > > Bodhi also currently cares about users being in the packager group to > decide whether they can create buildroot overrides (I think, not > actuall

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:31:50PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: >On 3 Jun 2017 8:33 am, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" wrote: > >I think to abandon the packager group for non-scratch builds would be a >mistake. >The sponsorship to packager status is an important part of ensuring that >th

jplesnik pushed to perl-LockFile-Simple (master). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

2017-06-03 Thread notifications
From 1e7d1c18d5f9c41cc5d353ee217119fea4d5a0e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:53:02 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- perl-LockFile-Simple.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-LockFile-Simple.spec b/perl-Loc

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

2017-06-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 05:02:39PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > The packager group is currently used for a few things: > > - tracking purpose, it's one of our biggest groups and also one of the most > > active > > - members of