On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > The packager group is currently used for a few things: > - tracking purpose, it's one of our biggest groups and also one of the most > active > - members of the packager group can do official package review > - members of the packager group can become maintainer of a package
I believe it is also the group that makes packagers fulfil the CLA/FPCA+1 criterion which enables certain Fedora services AFAIU. AFAIK this includes the e-mail alias for @fedoraproject.org. Somehow it might also include extra bugzilla privileges need to be able to re-open, re-assign or close bugs (not sure here). > We could of course adjust pagure is such a way that it will enforce being > member > of the packager group to be allowed to be added to a project but this seems > more > pain than gain. > (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git) What exactly does "alowed to be added to a project mean". Does this meant that they will get commit access to all branches of a project or can they also become a package owner? Can they become the default bug assignee for a project without being in the packager group? > So I would like to ask if we are fine with stopping to require the membership > of > the packager group to contributors? > > I do not see the packager group disappearing entirely since it will still be > needed for package reviews and we have given rel-eng tooling to check and > enforce > this on new package requests, but I think it makes sense to stop this > requirement > to commit on dist-git repos. If I understand this correctly, this would mean that there could be maintainers for a package that would not be reachable via the @fedoraproject.org alias? If this is correct it would make it harder to reach everyone when sending notifications about packages depending on orphaned packages as I use the @fedoraproject.org alias for this. > What do you think? I believe it is a great idea to allow everyone to fill PRs but I do not yet understand to the full package workflow when moving to just pagure instead of pkgdb I must confess. I added my open questions about the workflow to the wiki so the answers can be made available to everyone: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb#How_do_I_orphan_a_package.3F Regards Till
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
