F27 Self Contained Change: True Noarch Erlang Packages

= Proposed Self Contained Change: True Noarch Erlang Packages = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TrueNoarchErlangPackages Change owner(s): * Randy Barlow Erlang packages are currently all installed into %{_libdir}/erlang/lib, despite most of them being noarch packages. This proposal is to

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

Dne 3.3.2017 v 02:33 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. > > > > The guidelines on versioning packages were completely rewritten in order > to make them (hopefully) more comprehensible. This rewrite was not > intended to introduce functi

Re: fedorahosted.org retired today (2017-03-01)

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > There are still several hundred binary packages in F25 that > refer to that host: > > | [tim@passepartout ~]$ dnf repoquery --qf '%{url}\t%{name}' | fgrep > fedorahosted | wc -l > | 464 Rawhide numbers would be more useful, it isn't worth

Meeting cancelled: Modularity WG

Hello everybody, the Fedora Modularity Working Group meeting for this week has been cancelled. For future meetings, please refer to our calendar: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/modularity/ Ciao, Nils -- Nils Philippsen  "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to Red Hat           p

pl-7.4.1-1.fc27 license change

pl-7.4.1-1.fc27 package changed license from: (GPLv2+ with exceptions or Artistic 2.0) and (GPLv2+ with exceptions) and (GPLv2 with exception) and (GPL+ or Artistic) and LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2 and UCD and (UCD and MIT) and BSD and Public Domain and EPL and GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ to: (BSD and (G

Re: rawhide users: Do this now if you want to stick with F26 and not F27

On 03/03/2017 03:59 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Now that F26 is branched off from rawhide, I know many developers > (including me) want to stay with F26 instead of F27 to make sure we are > testing the upcoming release. By default, everyone who has rawhide > installed stays on the F27 train. > > Her

Re: Any voluteers for maintaining xml-security-c?

Hi, I'm not sure what is the proper way for this kind of situations. After I've requested admin access to xml-security-c ans send some email to admin of this package I have no reply. Just humble question: what should be done in such situations and/or what can/should I do? kloczek Tomasz Kłoczko

Package with spec name != packagename.spec

Hi I just came across a package (mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols) whose specfile isn't named .spec (in this case, mingw-qtquickcontrols.spec instead of mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols.spec). As I understand it this is against the guildelines? (Shouldn't the build actually fail?) Can I just fix it by r

Re: Package with spec name != packagename.spec

On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:03:51 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I just came across a package (mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols) whose specfile isn't named .spec (in this case, mingw-qtquickcontrols.spec instead of mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols.spec). As I understand it this is against the guildelines?

Re: Package with spec name != packagename.spec

On 06.03.2017 17:09, Martin Bříza wrote: On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:03:51 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I just came across a package (mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols) whose specfile isn't named .spec (in this case, mingw-qtquickcontrols.spec instead of mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols.spec). As I unders

Re: Package with spec name != packagename.spec

> "SM" == Sandro Mani writes: SM> So just for curiosity, does the tooling allow an arbitrary name for SM> the specfile and does it just pick the first one it finds when SM> building the SRPM? There is no one "tooling". fedpkg/pyrpkg will try to find the spec named after the package and then

Fedora 26-20170306.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 23/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170305.n.0): ID: 60083 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso

Re: rawhide users: Do this now if you want to stick with F26 and not F27

Is there a way to set arch and basearch with dnf config manager ? I want to cross update an installation using --installroot onto another installation. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 03/03/2017 03:59 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Now that F26 is branched off from rawhide

Re: rawhide users: Do this now if you want to stick with F26 and not F27

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:27:33AM -0700, linux guy wrote: > Is there a way to set arch and basearch with dnf config manager ? I want > to cross update an installation using --installroot onto another > installation. No. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190854. Zbyszek __

Re: Missing executables in Python 3 subpackages

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: > Hi all, > > According to the Fedora Packaging guidelines for Python [0], if a Python > package that supports Python 3 installs executables into */usr/bin*, then > either both Python versions of the executables should be packaged, or only >

Fedora Rawhide-20170306.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 20/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170305.n.0): ID: 60192 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL:

Re: rawhide users: Do this now if you want to stick with F26 and not F27

Thanks for the conclusive and informative reply. Saves me a lot of time trying to do it. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:27:33AM -0700, linux guy wrote: > > Is there a way to set arch and basearch with dnf conf

Re: Self Introduction: Olivier Lemasle

2017-03-06 2:40 GMT+01:00 Athos Ribeiro : > > Welcome, Olivier Thank you for your welcome and support! > I will review both of your packages. In the meanwhile, keep > positing links to more informal reviews in the same ticket you posted > this first one. If you are interested in hugo, we are pack

Re: fedorahosted.org retired today (2017-03-01)

On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:30:04 +0200 Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Tim Landscheidt > wrote: > > There are still several hundred binary packages in F25 that > > refer to that host: > > > > | [tim@passepartout ~]$ dnf repoquery --qf '%{url}\t%{name}' | > > fgrep fedorahosted |

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Alpha Freeze

Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora 26 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 26 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be mar

Re: New automated test coverage: openQA tests of critical path updates

On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 10:22 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > I am currently rolling out some changes to the Fedora openQA deployment > which enable a new testing workflow. From now on, a subset of openQA > tests should be run automatically on every critpath update, both on > initial s