Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23)
> On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x
> >> series in
> >> rawhide. The update should happe
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:46:19PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Is it ok to just name my source package js-qrcode-generator and package
> just the js bits of it, or do I need to name my package qrcode-
> generator? If the latter, would I be compelled to package all those
> language implementations
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:07:05PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 13.02.2017 21:35, Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> >ask Fedora infra guys for a ppc64/ppc64le VM and debug it locally?
> Well the debuginfo trick would have been a quick way to get a
> stacktrace, but sure, if there are any VMs available
On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote:
Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23)
> On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth
wrote:
> > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x
series
On 14.02.2017 12:21, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:07:05PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 13.02.2017 21:35, Dan Horák wrote:
ask Fedora infra guys for a ppc64/ppc64le VM and debug it locally?
Well the debuginfo trick would have been a quick way to get a
stacktrace, but
Hi Neal,
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that
there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other
problem is that the usage of them is not trivial, eg. the
%kernel_module_package macro (as the
Hello,
we are planning some changes in Git in rawhide according to some
changes in upstream. I want to apply all changes during this week
yet, but in case you have some recommendation or propmts to planned
changes, you can yet give me feedback before we will do that.
Briefly, changes what would be
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Kde live x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Server boot i386
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 11/96 (x86_64)
ID: 56813 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/56813
ID: 56814
Randy Barlow wrote:
> In working on packaging Ampache, I found a dependency that has a
> bundled version of this file:
>
> https://github.com/kazuhikoarase/qrcode-generator/blob/master/js/qrcode.js
...
> Is it ok to just name my source package js-qrcode-generator and package
> just the js bits of
Hi everybody,
I spent last few days updating Vagrant in Rawhide. As it turned out, it
is quite significant update for several reasons:
1) Upstream changed the way how Vagrant is distributed in upstream RPM.
Hence this is good opportunity to change the way we ship Vagrant to be
close to upstream.
Hi,
when compiling marsshooter on rawhide it fails with the following error message:
undefined reference to `sf::String::operator std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >() const'
This is the complete build.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7032/17757032/build.log
On Fedora
Hi everyone!
The submission deadline for Self contained Changes of Fedora 26 [1] is
coming in one week, on February 21st. Please, submit your Self
contained Changes by this deadline, earlier better.
Alpha release of Fedora 26 is planned then on March 21th.
The submission deadline for System Wide
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:27:27PM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when compiling marsshooter on rawhide it fails with the following error
> message:
> undefined reference to `sf::String::operator std::__cxx11::basic_string std::char_traits, std::allocator >() const'
>
> This is the compl
Hi,
On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools,
that there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness.
The other problem is that the usage of them is not trivial, eg.
Hoard is an alternative memory allocator (ie. malloc implementation)
for C++. It is described in this 2000 paper:
https://people.cs.umass.edu/~emery/pubs/berger-asplos2000.pdf
Fedora ships an old version (3.8) which fundamentally will not compile
on aarch64 because it is missing a bit of assem
Hi,
On 14-02-17 14:24, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hi,
On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that there
are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other probl
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
> Hi Neal,
>
>>> Hello Hans,
>>>
>>> (adding some more folks on CC..)
>>>
>>> You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that
>>> there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other
>>> problem is
On 02/14/2017 01:58 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> Hello,
> we are planning some changes in Git in rawhide according to some
> changes in upstream. I want to apply all changes during this week
> yet, but in case you have some recommendation or propmts to planned
> changes, you can yet give me feedback
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Docker SDK for Python, version 2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Docker_SDK_For_Python_Version_2
Change owner(s):
* Tomas Tomecek
Add new version of "Docker SDK for Python" to Fedora. This obsoletes
existing python-docker-py package.
== Detailed Desc
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 13:27 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when compiling marsshooter on rawhide it fails with the following
> error message:
> undefined reference to `sf::String::operator
> std::__cxx11::basic_string,
> std::allocator >() const'
>
> This is the complete build.log
> https
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:19:11AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> (3) Let others create subpackages for the other bindings in future on
> an as-needed basis (and make them become co-maintainers and do the
> work :-)
This seems like the right approach to me too.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Proj
> On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 13:27 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> retry the marsshooter-0.7.6-4.fc26 f26-rebuild build?
>
> # fedpkg build --target f26-rebuild
>
> Hopefully it will automagically work now that the f26-rebuild buildroot
> has a rebuilt SFML
>
>
> -Yanko
ok i will give it a try
On 14 February 2017 at 02:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:44:50AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks! So I got bitten again today by the situation where the
> > primary contact for a given package considers the 'canonical' source
> > for the spec file t
On 14/02/17 14:49 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:27:27PM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
when compiling marsshooter on rawhide it fails with the following error message:
undefined reference to `sf::String::operator std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >() const'
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Rawhide 20170214.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:41:52PM +, Mat Booth wrote:
> Ticket is still has "need info" status -- if the info is provided, the
> status should be set to "discuss at next meeting"
Indeed. I changed the status. (I feels a bit presumptuous to tell the
FPC when exactly they have to discuss somet
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Server boot i386
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 17/107 (x86_64), 2/2 (i386)
ID: 56930 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/56930
ID: 56931 Test:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017, at 08:14 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> 3) The downside of (1) is that the plugin registration scripts are baked
> into vagrant plugins, I had to apply some hacks to keep the backward
> compatibility with Vagrant plugins currently in Fedora.
While you're working on this, can you
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Dan Horák wrote:
> it could be a gcc7 bug on 32-bit arches, you can check by switching to
> -O1 or -O0 instead of the default -O2, or by dropping "inline" for
> stcmp()
>
I tested with -01 and O0, and it solves the issue partially. If I drop the
inlines, the program compile
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 26 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 26
on Feb 9th 2017. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 26 for:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/pkgconf_as_system_pkg-config_implementation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC7
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cha
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:56:28PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 26 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 26
> on Feb 9th 2017. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 26 for:
systemd failed to rebuild. There were a couple of issues, but it's the
last one that's inter
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:39:00PM +0100, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by Fedora
> Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686 architectures. I saw the logs
> and I tried a mock build in my own machine too, the pr
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:48:27 +0100 (CET)
"Francisco J. Tsao Santin" wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > it could be a gcc7 bug on 32-bit arches, you can check by switching
> > to -O1 or -O0 instead of the default -O2, or by dropping "inline"
> > for stcmp()
> >
>
> I tested wi
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:23:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> GNU89 vs. C99 inlining, that code is really old and apparently nobody
> touched it since it has been written.
>
> As everything is in a single file, either change all the inlines in the file
> to static inline, or turn them into exte
On 02/14/2017 01:56 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Things still needing rebuilt
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f26-need-rebuild.html
16160 builds have been tagged into f26, there s currently 1299 failed
builds that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
FTBFS bugs will be fi
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:14:22PM +, Emery Berger wrote:
> I am willing to take it over, if that is allowed,
Absolutely. You should take a look at becoming a Fedora
packager if you're not one already:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Jo
On 14 February 2017 4:30:12 pm GMT-06:00, Michael Cronenworth
wrote:
>On 02/14/2017 01:56 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>> Things still needing rebuilt
>>
>http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f26-need-rebuild.html
>>
>> 16160 builds have been tagged into f26, there s currently 1299 failed
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> Hi folks! So I got bitten again today by the situation where the
AW> primary contact for a given package considers the 'canonical' source
AW> for the spec file to be some external SCM, and finds it a problem
AW> when someone (e.g. a provenpackager like me
> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> Indeed. I changed the status. (I feels a bit presumptuous to tell
ZJ> the FPC when exactly they have to discuss something, but if it's
ZJ> that's what it takes, then OK.)
trac unfortunately doesn't have any facility for auto-moving things bac
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 18:40 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> Hi folks! So I got bitten again today by the situation where the
> AW> primary contact for a given package considers the 'canonical' source
> AW> for the spec file to be some externa
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 22:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:56:28PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora 26 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 26
> > on Feb 9th 2017. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 26 for:
>
> systemd
On Ter, 2017-02-14 at 14:56 -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 26 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 26
> on Feb 9th 2017. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 26 for:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/pkgconf_as_system_pkg-config_i
> mplementation
> http
On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote:
> libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
> sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm
> error: no matching function for call to ...
> Invalid code.
I am 99% sure that these 2 errors are due to a bug in dbus-c++. Is the
new compiler attempting to compil
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:42:58 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> JFTR , after receive from koschei messages like opencv's builds are
> back to normal in Fedora Rawhide
>
> I did git checkout master; git pull; fedpkg build and resend to
> build frei0r-plugins, mlt, opencv , php-facedetect , which builds
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 22:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:56:28PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Per the Fedora 26 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 26
>> > on Feb 9
- 元のメッセージ -
> 差出人: "Neal Gompa"
> 宛先: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> 送信済み: 2017年2月15日, 水曜日 12:10:13
> 件名: Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild - gnutls, µhttpd users
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 22:22 +, Zbigniew J
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:19:05PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
>
> - 元のメッセージ -
> > 差出人: "Neal Gompa"
> > 宛先: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > 送信済み: 2017年2月15日, 水曜日 12:10:13
> > 件名: Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild - gnutls, µhttpd users
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8
On Ter, 2017-02-14 at 19:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:42:58 +
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> >
> > JFTR , after receive from koschei messages like opencv's builds are
> > back to normal in Fedora Rawhide
> >
> > I did git checkout master; git pull; fedpkg build and resen
Greetings,
The LLVM project has been providing a C++ ABI for a while [1]. A naive user
like I'm would presume Fedora easily ships with that, as the saying goes:
“Fedora is a developer-friendly distro.” Unfortunately, that isn't the case for
this instance and if one is using clang++, they have t
49 matches
Mail list logo
