Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

Kevin Fenzi píše v Út 31. 01. 2017 v 16:19 -0700: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:26:29 +0100 > Julian Sikorski wrote: > > > - chain-building has been broken for a month [2] so now requesting > > each build in the chain separately is required > > I just did a ping on that issue. Hopefully we can get a

flatpak app launch script

Hi, I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit regression from rpm packages. It's really different to type: $firefox or $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox Especially when "flatpak run org.mozilla" carries no information for user, they just want to launch the app and don't ca

Re: Self Introduction: Darryl T. Agostinelli

Hello and welcome to Fedora! Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat - Original Message - From: "Darryl T. Agostinelli" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 5:30:28 AM Subject: Self Introduction: Darryl T. Agostin

Orphaning rubygem-logging

Hi, I just updated and fixed rubygem-logging, but since I have no use for this package, I just orphaned it in PkgDb. Feel free to pick it up or let it go away ... Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Offering to co maintain lv2 related packages (lv2, lilv, suil, serd, sord, sratom...)

> Il giorno 25 gen 2017, alle ore 10:57, Simone Caronni > ha scritto: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Guido Aulisi > wrote: > Hello, > I recently joined the packager group and I made 2 audio related > packages (setBfree and lv2-ir-plugins). > I n

Re: flatpak app launch script

- Original Message - > Hi, > > I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit regression > from rpm packages. It's really different to type: > > $firefox > > or > > $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox > > Especially when "flatpak run org.mozilla" carries no information for

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: On 30/01/17 12:34 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 27.01.2017 um 13:12 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: On 27/01/17 13:02 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 27.01.2017 um 12:21 schrieb J

F26 Self Contained Change: LDC 1.1.0

= Proposed Self Contained Change: LDC 1.1.0 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LDC1.1.0 Change owner(s): * Kalev Lember Update LDC to 1.1.0 in Fedora 26. == Detailed Description == The LDC D compiler has been lagging behind upstream in Fedora, making it difficult to build software that n

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed due to a known bug for ppc64le: https://gcc.

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 13:13 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaLVMRAID > > Change owner(s): > * Vratislav Podzimek (Anaconda/Blivet) > * Heinz Mauelshagen (LVM) > > Use LVM RAID instead of LVM of top o

Re: flatpak app launch script

Hi! >> Hi, >> >> I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit regression >> from rpm packages. It's really different to type: >> >> $firefox >> >> or >> >> $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox >> >> Especially when "flatpak run org.mozilla" carries no information for >> user, they

Re: flatpak app launch script

On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 10:05 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: > Hi, > > I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit > regression  > from rpm packages. It's really different to type: > > $firefox > > or > > $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox Can you pass command line arguments like thi

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

On 02/01/2017 12:44 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed d

Re: Rust SIG

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello everybody, > > we are establishing new SIG for Rust[0]. Feel free to join us on IRC > (#fedora-rust) and/or Mailing List (r...@lists.fedoraproject.org). > > Help with improving our wiki page is very welcomed ;) > > [0] https://fedorapro

Re: Rust SIG

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> we are establishing new SIG for Rust[0]. Feel free to join us on IRC >> (#fedora-rust) and/or Mailing List (r...@lists.fedoraproject.org). >> >> Help with improvi

Re: flatpak app launch script

On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 13:46 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > Can you pass command line arguments like this ? For example inkscape > can be used not only as a GUI app, but also from the command line to > convert SVG files to PNG and other things. So it would be good if > flatpack can also support that.

Re: flatpak app launch script

On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 07:16 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 13:46 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > > Can you pass command line arguments like this ? For example > > inkscape > > can be used not only as a GUI app, but also from the command line > > to > > convert SVG files to PN

Fedora Rawhide-20170201.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 13/96 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) ID: 55953 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedor

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

Am 01.02.2017 um 12:44 schrieb Tom Hughes: On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed

Maven downgrade to 3.3.9 in rawhide

Hi fellow packagers, In the beginning of this year, maven upstream announced [1] they dropped 3.4.0 release and reverted the changes made. We already had 3.4.0 snapshot in Fedora Rawhide, so this means we have to revert maven package back to version 3.3.9. [1] https://mail-archives.apache.o

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-02-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: per-product packaging question

On 01/30/2017 05:03 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:00:34PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking at the per-product packaging doc at >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Per-Product_Configuration >> and I see that variants for all products are installed

Re: per-product packaging question

On 02/01/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Given that this is never going to happen (we decided that changing the config > implicitly is a bad idea), I should update the policy to recommend using > copies > rather than symlinks and keeping the variant configs in /usr/share instead of > in

Re: per-product packaging question

On 01/31/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > We should just install one default in the default location, We don't > want to document to users the difference > > During post install the content can be modified based on the package. > > Please do not do this. It will react badly to future pac

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 01/31/2017 02:29 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonClassroomLab > > Change owner(s): > * Miro Hrončok > * SIGs/Python > > > A new Python Classroom Lab will be created in 3 variants: Workstation > based, Docker

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 1.2.2017 16:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 01/31/2017 02:29 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonClassroomLab Change owner(s): * Miro Hrončok * SIGs/Python A new Python Classroom Lab will be created in 3 variants:

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > What's the advantage here vs. providing a "Python Classroom Lab" install > target > in GNOME Software that allows you to turn any Fedora Workstation installation > into a Classroom Lab? > GNOME Software can't do that. As far as I know

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 02/01/2017 10:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 1.2.2017 16:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 01/31/2017 02:29 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> = System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonClassroomLab >>> >>> Change owner(s): >>> * Miro Hrončok >>> * SIG

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 02/01/2017 10:34 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> >> What's the advantage here vs. providing a "Python Classroom Lab" install >> target >> in GNOME Software that allows you to turn any Fedora Workstation installation >> into a Classroom La

Re: per-product packaging question

On 02/01/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/30/2017 05:03 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:00:34PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm looking at the per-product packaging doc at >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Per-Product_Configuration

Re: per-product packaging question

On 02/01/2017 10:48 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 02/01/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 01/30/2017 05:03 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:00:34PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: Hi, I'm looking at the per-product packaging doc at https://

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On 01/31/2017 10:35 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Dusty Mabe >> >> >> Produce a new containe

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On 01/31/2017 09:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Dusty Mabe >> >> >> P

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

>>> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >>> >>> Change owner(s): >>> * Dusty Mabe >>> >>> >>> Produce a new container image that contains as little as possible, but >>> also still provides the ability to insta

Re: Fedora PSM2 build failures

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:04:50 +0100 Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi Aravind, > > there was an upgrade of GCC to version 7 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC7 . As I can not turn the > options off by my self, I am resending this to Release Engineering > mailing list to consider what can be done her

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:14:21PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > Who supports microdnf? Is that the dnf team or others? It is the DNF team. I have a hope that these will be fronted by a command called "yum" which will implement close-to-full compatibility with Yum Classic, and which will: 1. Us

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

Am 01.02.2017 um 15:13 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 01.02.2017 um 12:44 schrieb Tom Hughes: On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can'

HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: darktable-2.2.2-1.fc26.src.rpm efl-1.18.4-2.fc26.src.rpm freeimage-3.17.0-8.fc26.src.rpm gd-2.2.4-1.fc26.src.rpm gdal-2.1.2-6.fc26.src.rpm gegl03-0.3

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > While I am sure these changes are done with an aim of improving things > in the long run, the churn caused by them is really starting to take a > toll on my motivation. Could something be done to mitigate the > inconveniences caused by the

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 31.1.2017 09:13, Amit Saha wrote: >> Hello Jan, >> >> The Fedora Scientific spin already includes most of the Python 3 >> packages you are looking at. Is it worth looking at that instead of a >> new spin? I am happy to change it to us

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:05:50 -0800 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Julian Sikorski > wrote: > > While I am sure these changes are done with an aim of improving > > things in the long run, the churn caused by them is really starting > > to take a toll on my motivation.

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

On 02/01/2017 02:56 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> - fedpkg now needs authentication via kerberos instead of ssh key [3], >> which means that I now have to run kinit before starting a packaging >> session, in addition to firing up keepass and entering the password > > You can request a renewable ti

Orphaning xlogin

Hi, because of lack of free time to actively maintan all of my packages with trying to give the same chances to all of them, I decided to orphan xlogin. Also, I don't use xlogin any more due to some issues with SELinux. Please feel free to pick the package up. I'll click the orphan button just

Dependency rebuild order

Hi Wondering if someone has some neat script which outputs the rebuild order of a set of packages, say after a library these depend on bumped its soname. Thanks Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an em

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:55 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Please ensure upgrades of systems using MD RAID are properly tested. Please help test upgrades if there's a layout you want to work. The only way anything gets tested is if someone does the test. > My server at home broke on upgrading

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

Actually, I've got a concern about this feature. I'm not sure what gnome-shell depends on for monitoring mdadm arrays, but I know it will put up a notification if an mdadm member becomes faulty; because I've seen this notification. Maybe it's getting this information from udisksd? In any case, I'm

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 at 5:20 am, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > >> On 31.1.2017 09:13, Amit Saha wrote: > >> Hello Jan, > >> > >> The Fedora Scientific spin already includes most of the Python 3 > >> packages you are looking at. Is it w

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:40:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Sure it can; you just create a metapackage that Requires/Recommends: > all of the members of the comps group and add AppData XML and a logo > to that metapackage. It would be nice to have a feature like this in Software where we

koji failed to build srpm from scm

Hi, I am getting this error: > BuildError: error building srpm, mock exited with status 1; > see build.log for more information But there is no build.log :\ Both fedpkg mockbuild and fedpkg srpm work on local machine. Fails on koji for both f25 and rawhide. Is the problem on my machine or is the

Re: koji failed to build srpm from scm

On 01/02/17 21:20, Jonny Heggheim wrote: I am getting this error: BuildError: error building srpm, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information But there is no build.log :\ Yes there is: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5224/17545224/build.log Looks like the

Re: koji failed to build srpm from scm

Tom Hughes: > Yes there is: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5224/17545224/build.log > > Looks like the source is missing - did you upload it to the lookaside > cache? Thanks, the sources file did not have the source tarball entry. Jonny signature.asc Description: OpenPGP di

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

... The Workstation based lab will also contain: * Basic GNOME * Terminal emulator * Text editor * PDF reader * Web browser * Image viewer * ...and possibly other utilities In Workstation you can find the idle3 executable in /usr/bin but users will not note it because there is not a grafical la

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

Just a small note here, I'll add a desktop file for idle3 soon, there is already a bugzilla [0] for that. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392049 Regards, Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat - Original Message - From: "Wil

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

Awesome! Just a small note here, I'll add a desktop file for idle3 soon, there is already a bugzilla [0] for that. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392049 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an em

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

Am 01.02.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Sandro Mani: Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: darktable-2.2.2-1.fc26.src.rpm efl-1.18.4-2.fc26.src.rpm freeimage-3.17.0-8.fc26.src.rpm gd-2.2.4-1.fc26

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

W dniu 01.02.2017 o 09:12, Lubomír Sedlář pisze: > Kevin Fenzi píše v Út 31. 01. 2017 v 16:19 -0700: >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:26:29 +0100 >> Julian Sikorski wrote: >> >>> - chain-building has been broken for a month [2] so now requesting >>> each build in the chain separately is required >> >> I

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

On 02/01/2017 06:59 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which > include soname bumps. > > I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: Hi Sandro, Thanks for working on this! The number of packages affected by the soname bump is qui