Re: yubico-piv-tool & p11-kit

2016-12-05 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 08:41 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On 12/03/2016 01:50 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > So apparently yubico-piv-tool ships $libdir/libykpkcs11.so*, but > > this > > doesn't get picked up by p11-kit by default. I suspect it has gone > > unnoticed largely because for most cruci

orphaning python-ladon

2016-12-05 Thread Matthias Runge
Hello, due to lack of time, and because I don't use it any more, I'm hereby orphaning python-ladon. It's a low maintenance package. Feel free to pick it up. Matthias ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Re: When to make packeges "dnf protected"

2016-12-05 Thread Honza Silhan
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote: >> Hi all, Hi, >> As the maintainer of bcache-tools I ran into the situation that a collegue >> accidentally removed bcache-tools, resulting in a system that failed to boot >> after installin

Re: clarification of package naming guidelines

2016-12-05 Thread Dave Love
Thanks for the comments. "Gerald B. Cox" writes: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Mattia Verga > wrote: > >> >> So, in my opinion, you did it right naming your package "superlu_dist". >> For sure, you MUST not use uppercase letters. > > > I believe there is a bit of leeway for the packager her

Re: When to make packeges "dnf protected"

2016-12-05 Thread Florian Weimer
On 12/03/2016 07:10 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote: I'm considering to make bcache-tools protected (by including a config file in the package in /etc/dnf/protected.d/) to prevent accidental erasure of the package. Is this the proper way to prevent this situation? Not really. It's totally fine to remo

Re: installing RPMs on NFS filesystems

2016-12-05 Thread Dave Love
den...@ausil.us writes: > Without filesystem capabilities, many things will not work. Ping as a > user for instance. Lots of setuid binaries switched to using > filesystem capabilities rather than setuid and require it to work. RPM > failing is the right thing to do. I haven't actually noticed pr

Re: qr_mumps rename

2016-12-05 Thread Dave Love
Antonio Trande writes: > Hi all. > > I wish to rename 'qr_mumps' to 'qrmumps', Why? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: qr_mumps rename

2016-12-05 Thread Antonio Trande
On 12/05/2016 12:45 PM, Dave Love wrote: > Antonio Trande writes: > >> Hi all. >> >> I wish to rename 'qr_mumps' to 'qrmumps', > > Why? > ___ After our discussion about 'underscore' issue and according to suggestions of the guidelines. -- --- Anto

Re: clarification of package naming guidelines

2016-12-05 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 05/12/16 11:30 +, Dave Love wrote: Why are most people going to use superlu-dist when that's not the proper name of the software? I'm not familiar with a SuperLU user community, but I think I can speak about DL_POLY as a DL veteran; I packaged it as "dl_poly" and wouldn't expect people to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161205.n.0 changes

2016-12-05 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161204.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161205.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 39 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B

Fedora Rawhide-20161205.n.0 compose check report

2016-12-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 18/79 (x86_64), 6/15 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161204.n.0): ID: 50615 Test: x86_64 universal in

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 05:41:13PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > I mean only to clarify here. Too often people skim or media picks up > on brief statements from those that actually do understand but are > writing a rushed reply and we get misinformation spreading beyond our > project's normal communi

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sun, 4 Dec 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 16:39 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: That is a different issue. And indeed I see it as well, and was quite surprised at them checking the TLS validity of a captive portal page. We have no plans to stop doing this, because that's h

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 09:05 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > That is incorrect in my experience. When I go to coffee shops, my > iphone > shows the portal page, but my laptop shows the TLS cert invalid > thing. Oh wow. I didn't know that. Feels like time to give up So what's your recommendation,

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Florian Weimer
On 12/05/2016 03:05 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 16:39 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: That is a different issue. And indeed I see it as well, and was quite surprised at them checking the TLS validity of a captive portal page. We have

Re: dnf skipping updates in koji

2016-12-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday, November 19, 2016 8:13:41 PM CST Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Nov 19, 2016 7:26 PM, "Dan Horák" wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:16:17 -0700 > > > > Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > I just noticed this in a root.log for a koji rawhide build that > > > > > didn't error out doing the insta

Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
The stats I get are about a week behind, which means I now have information about the first week of the Fedora 25 release. See the graph here: https://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/stats/fedora-os-select-2016-11-22.png (and please note the caveats about what you're looking at — the numbers on the left

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 09:05 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: That is incorrect in my experience. When I go to coffee shops, my iphone shows the portal page, but my laptop shows the TLS cert invalid thing. Oh wow. I didn't know that. Feels like time to gi

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-12-05 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 2 packages were orphaned python-typeshed [master] was orphaned by dshea Static type information for python modules https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pyth

Reviews Weekly

2016-12-05 Thread nobody
Start Date: 2016-11-28 10:08:02.326085 End Date: 2016-12-05 10:08:02.326085 Shawn Iwinski : 8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358143 php-zendframework-zend-mvc-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358157 php-zendframework-zend-mvc-plugin-file

Re: yubico-piv-tool & p11-kit

2016-12-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 08:41 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote: >> On 12/03/2016 01:50 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: >> > So apparently yubico-piv-tool ships $libdir/libykpkcs11.so*, but >> > this >> > doesn't get picked up by p11-kit by defau

Re: yubico-piv-tool & p11-kit

2016-12-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On 12/03/2016 01:50 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: >> >> So apparently yubico-piv-tool ships $libdir/libykpkcs11.so*, but this >> doesn't get picked up by p11-kit by default. I suspect it has gone >> unnoticed largely because for most crucial ope

Re: yubico-piv-tool & p11-kit

2016-12-05 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 10:23 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > Indeed, in the case where one has both ykcs11 and opensc, he would > > have > > to supply --detailed-urls to p11tool to be able to distinguish > > between > > objects. That is, because they will have identical URLs except for > > the

[389-devel] Please review lib389 48984: support environment variable to define defaults.inf

2016-12-05 Thread thierry bordaz
While testing in a prefix install I found it useful: https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48984/0003-Ticket-48984-support-of-environment-variable-for-def.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: yubico-piv-tool & p11-kit

2016-12-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 10:23 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >> > Indeed, in the case where one has both ykcs11 and opensc, he would >> > have >> > to supply --detailed-urls to p11tool to be able to distinguish >> > between >> > o

Re: clarification of package naming guidelines

2016-12-05 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Dave Love wrote: > > Why are most people going to use superlu-dist when that's not the proper > name of the software? I'm not familiar with a SuperLU user community, > but I think I can speak about DL_POLY as a DL veteran; I packaged it as > "dl_poly" and wouldn't

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-05 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 12/05/2016 08:51 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: preliminary stats show a big drop in i686 mirror connections over the last year — like, about cut in half. I'm not sure if this is a glitch or representative of a real move — or whether it's because of perceived or actual changes we've made, or just b

F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Jan Kurik
= System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/coredumpctl Change owner(s): * Michael Catanzaro Enable coredumpctl by default. Core dumps will be stored in the system journal rather than created in the crashing process's current working directory by

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

2016-12-05 Thread Iiro Laiho
> After waste sometime on understand what happened to Finnish keyboards > layout, I don't think you can blame Fedora project, looking at > upstream sources and releases [1] from xkeyboard-config-2.18 > to  xkeyboard-config-2.19, we got one commit with "rules: Move > Finnish DAS layout to extras", I

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of > that work? > I don't see the relevance of that observation. A new version, whenever it is released w

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

2016-12-05 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 12/02/2016 10:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Przemek Klosowski wrote: Right, that's what I thought. Still, completely blocking the upgrade seems rude. Yum had an option --skip-broken that would just leave such packages alone, I don't think keeping an old version of the filesystem package (becau

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Török Edwin
On 2016-12-05 18:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/coredumpctl > > Change owner(s): > * Michael Catanzaro > > Enable coredumpctl by default. Core dumps will be stored in the system > journal rather than created i

I'd like to take ownership of Orpie

2016-12-05 Thread Jared L Wallace
This package has been retired for some time. I've updated it and gotten it reviewed and approved. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152   Kind regards, JARED L. WALLACE Software Engineer, Sametime Extended Support Phone: 1-512-973-5281 E-mail: jared-wall...@us.ibm.com

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:03:49PM +0200, Iiro Laiho wrote: > But isn't it quite exceptable that things can break when one version- > updates upstream components like this? After all, they are just > building blocks of operating systems, not finalized products in > themselves. Isn't it the job of t

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 12/05/2016 12:27 PM, Török Edwin wrote: The description here is a bit confusing, and scary: what if I run out of space and I need to rm the coredumps to make room? If the coredumps are stored in the same file as the systemd journal I'd loose my system logs too, so it makes no sense to have t

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 15:37 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > If I remember correctly, the browser accessing a captive portal does > not  > use the regular user Firefox profile, so we either have to preload > its  > profiles with intermediate CAs, or copy them over from the user's  > Firefox profile.

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 09:59 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > Right now, the situation leads me to having to close the gnome window > which only displays "TLS certificate invalid" or some text like that, > and still use my firefox and a new tab/window to get through the > captive portal. Good point. I

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 19:27 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > The description here is a bit confusing, and scary: what if I run out > of space and I need to rm the coredumps to make room? Sorry, that description is wrong; core dumps used to be stored in the journal and still can be, but that's not the d

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 05.12.16 19:27, Török Edwin (edwin...@etorok.eu) wrote: > On 2016-12-05 18:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/coredumpctl > > > > Change owner(s): > > * Michael Catanzaro > > > > Enable coredumpctl by

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread DJ Delorie
Jan Kurik writes: > Note that coredumpctl is intended as a developer tool, As a developer, I remove abrt and anything else that redirects cores away from my development area. It's really hard to debug a core dump if you can't find the core file. Just sayin'

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:04:11AM -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're > > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of > > that work? > I don't see the relevance of that observation. A new version, > whenever i

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Christian Schaller
Actually, I was told that Debarshi committed a fix for the TLS error in captive portal just last week and has pushed a fix for it. Christian - Original Message - > From: "Michael Catanzaro" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 1:16:08

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 14:55 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote: > Actually, I was told that Debarshi committed a fix for the TLS error > in captive portal just last  > week and has pushed a fix for it. It's two different issues unfortunately. ___ devel mail

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're > > > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of > > > that work? > > I don't see the relevance of that observation. A new version, > > wheneve

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:04:11AM -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're >> > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of >> > that work? >> I don't see

hdf5 1.8.18 update in rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm building hdf5 1.8.18 for rawhide now. I'll be rebuilding all dependent packages afterwards. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 8

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:36:13PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Jan Kurik writes: > > Note that coredumpctl is intended as a developer tool, > > As a developer, I remove abrt and anything else that redirects cores > away from my development area. It's really hard to debug a core dump if > you c

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 12:41:18PM -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > If you're saying that you believe 5 months wasn't long enough - I > suppose that is fair... but the reason there was only 5 months wasn't > by design - it was due to schedule slippage. As far as impact - I It was by design, though —

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:43:58PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > I'm not sure it's much harder to do without modularity. Right now > Fedora could do a Fedora 26 release without any conventional release > media for server and workstation, by just using dnf system-upgrade and > gnome-software. And in

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > still not sure what that means? Software is constantly being updated, > > evolving. How does running older versions of software increase > > "impact"? > > I'm not saying running older versions increases it -- I'm saying I > don't think n

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:43:58PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> I'm not sure it's much harder to do without modularity. Right now >> Fedora could do a Fedora 26 release without any conventional release >> media for server and workstation, by

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:43:58PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> I'm not sure it's much harder to do without modularity. Right now >> Fedora could do a Fedora 26 release without any conventional release >> media for server and workstation, by

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread jfilak
" -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora Datum: 5. 12. 2016 21:57:12 Předmět: Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default "On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:36:13PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: >  > Jan Kurik write

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread jfilak
-- Původní zpráva -- Od: DJ Delorie Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora Datum: 5. 12. 2016 20:37:43 Předmět: Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default " Jan Kurik writes: > Note that coredumpctl is intended as a developer tool, As a developer, I re

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread DJ Delorie
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > You still can restore such behaviour pretty easily. Just set the > kernel.core_pattern sysctl. Yup, that's what I do. Just adding my two cents on Fedora trying to help me "be a developer" without doing what I need as a developer. But I typically uninstall

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version > your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken > and they wait for .1. Some wait for .2 (which doesn't exist in your > proposal but clearly

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version > your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken > and they wait for .1. Some wait for .2 (which doesn't exist in your > proposal but clearly could).

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version >> your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken >> and they wait for .1. Some wai

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread jfilak
If you remove ABRT and set kernel.core_pattern to 'core', then if you don't configure systemd to use RLIMIT_CORE=0, every crashing process will create  a new core dump file in its CWD: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ message/HQ4JFTYLPT5GRW6AD4M2MWG

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20161205.n.0 compose check report

2016-12-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 13:31 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Workstation live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > Xfce raw-xz armhfp > Minimal raw-xz armhfp > Workstation live x86_64 > Kde live i386 > > Failed openQA tests: 18/79 (x86_64), 6/15 (i386) > > New failures (sa

VTK 7.1 w/MPI coming to rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm building VTK 7.1 for rawhide now. Other big change is MPI support. I'll build the dependent packages tomorrow after it completes (about 20 hours). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 5 December 2016 at 17:18, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version >> your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken >> and they wait for .1. Some wait f

My package has stopped building on rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Jared L Wallace
  The configure script errors out when checking:   AC_TRY_LINK([#include ],    [gsl_complex a; GSL_SET_COMPLEX(&a, 1.0, 1.0);   gsl_comple

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jared L Wallace wrote: > > The configure script errors out when checking: > > AC_TRY_LINK([#include ], > [gsl_complex a; GSL_SET_COMPLEX(&a, 1.0, 1.0); > gsl_complex_logabs(a);], > HAS_GSL_LIB=yes, HAS_GSL_LIB=no) > > This works fine on F25. > > I checked g

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Jared L Wallace wrote: > > The configure script errors out when checking: > > AC_TRY_LINK([#include ], > [gsl_complex a; GSL_SET_COMPLEX(&a, 1.0, 1.0); > gsl_complex_logabs(a);], > HAS_GSL_LIB=yes, HAS_GSL_LIB=no) > > This works fine on F25. > > I checked gs

FESCo and Council elections - December 2016/January 2017

2016-12-05 Thread Jan Kurik
Greetings, FESCo and Council elections are now open and we're looking for new candidates: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections For FESCo we have opened five seats: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations For Council we have opened one seat: https://fedoraproj

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > It was by design, though — for a while, when a schedule slipped, we > planned the next schedule as 6 or 7 months from the actual release. > This time, we tried to keep it to October even though the previous > release had slipped, resulting

i686 [was Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?]

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:51:35AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > into it, and it's in the middle of his priorities somewhere between > "actual urgent work" and "other actual important work"), but > preliminary stats show a big drop in i686 mirror connections over the > last year — like, about cut

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:03:32PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I still think it's a good idea for Workstation. We really need to be > seen as the leading GNOME distro: that's what gets GNOME people using > Workstation and recommending that other people install it, then those > people recommen

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Jared L Wallace
Thanks. How can I examine the config.log? (I know soomeone mentioned adding "||:" after %configure, but I don't see where the config.log ends up being accessible)     JARED L. WALLACE Software Engineer, Sametime Extended Support Phone: 1-512-973-5281 E-mail: jared-wall...@us.ibm.com     - Origi

Re: i686 [was Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?]

2016-12-05 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:51:35AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> into it, and it's in the middle of his priorities somewhere between >> "actual urgent work" and "other actual important work"), but >> preliminary stats show a big drop in i68

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > The stats I get are about a week behind, which means I now have > information about the first week of the Fedora 25 release. See the > graph here: > > https://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/stats/fedora-os-select-2016-11-22.png Can you pu

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:59:41AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Can you publish the data that was used to make this graph? > (I don't mean the raw logs, just the table of #IPs vs date vs release) We don't want to expose the IP addresses. Actually, *I* don't even see them. Is there a

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:10:39PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:59:41AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Can you publish the data that was used to make this graph? > > (I don't mean the raw logs, just the table of #IPs vs date vs release) > > We don't want

Re: No Boost update in F25

2016-12-05 Thread Joseph Stockman
Well, it continues to mean the busted version of boost::asio for those who want to utilize any of the C++11 features (futures, etc). We've been forced to drop all Fedora support for our products until that changes. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> It was by design, though — for a while, when a schedule slipped, we >> planned the next schedule as 6 or 7 months from the actual release. >> This time, we tried to keep it to Oct

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Jared L Wallace
Nevermind, I was able to figure that out.   Thanks Jerry, I have it building now :) JARED L. WALLACE Software Engineer, Sametime Extended Support Phone: 1-512-973-5281 E-mail: jared-wall...@us.ibm.com     - Original message -From: Jared L Wallace/Austin/IBM@IBMUSTo: devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Nicholas Miell
On 12/05/2016 12:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: systemd-coredump+coredumpctl give you pretty easy access to core files, they are just dumped into /var/lib/systemd/coredump/. The advantage is that a) things are logged and can be easily looked up and queried, b) you get a lot of metadata

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Nicholas Miell
On 12/05/2016 05:46 PM, Nicholas Miell wrote: On 12/05/2016 12:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: systemd-coredump+coredumpctl give you pretty easy access to core files, they are just dumped into /var/lib/systemd/coredump/. The advantage is that a) things are logged and can be easily look

Re: No Boost update in F25

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 01:41 +, Joseph Stockman wrote: > Well, it continues to mean the busted version of boost::asio for > those who want to utilize any of the C++11 features (futures, etc). > We've been forced to drop all Fedora support for our products until > that changes. Well a Boost vers

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 19:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > That's exactly why I'm suggesting the point release or batched update > — > that would include a GNOME bump. OK then, if we're willing to bump all of GNOME in a point release (that's a lot of stuff!) then I don't object. __

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 5 December 2016 at 19:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> The stats I get are about a week behind, which means I now have >> information about the first week of the Fedora 25 release. See the >> graph here: >> >> https://ma

Re: hdf5 1.8.18 update in rawhide

2016-12-05 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/05/2016 01:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm building hdf5 1.8.18 for rawhide now. I'll be rebuilding all dependent packages afterwards. Scratch that - ppc64 test failures again. *sigh* -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:23PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 19:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> The stats I get are about a week behind, which means I now have > >> information about

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:58:19PM -0800, Nicholas Miell wrote: > On 12/05/2016 05:46 PM, Nicholas Miell wrote: > >On 12/05/2016 12:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>systemd-coredump+coredumpctl give you pretty easy access to core > >>files, they are just dumped into /var/lib/systemd/co

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Nicholas Miell
On 12/05/2016 07:05 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: meanwhile systemd-coredump steals away my core dumps and requires privileged operations to retrieve them. No, it doesn't. Coredumps are accessible to the user that the program was running under. So you can see your coredumps, and privile

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates - warning

2016-12-05 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/10/2016 03:30 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora26CFlags Change owner(s): * Florian Weimer This change updates the default C/C++ compilation flags, as determined by the redhat-rpm-c

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates

2016-12-05 Thread Thomas Daede
I have such a piece of hardware and could run a benchmark in ~1 week, if you're curious. That said, Fedora Workstation is borderline unusable on that hardware anyway - due to the integrated graphics, not the CPU. I doubt most users would notice a slowdown from different CFLAGS when gnome-shell can'

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates - warning

2016-12-05 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/06/2016 04:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I've run into a reasonable number of failures of (custom) configure checks due to this. Mainly calling exit() without including stdlib.h. So keep alert everyone. Unfortunately this can lead to unpredictable and perhaps hard to detect changes. It

HTML Netiquette [Re: I'd like to take ownership of Orpie]

2016-12-05 Thread Giovanni
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:47:16PM +, Jared L Wallace wrote: > This package has > been retired for some time. I've updated it and gotten it reviewed and > approved. href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152"; rel="noopener" > target="_blank" > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

2016-12-05 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 5.12.2016 v 17:54 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > Note that coredumpctl is intended as a developer tool, not as an > automatic bug reporting tool nor as a replacement for ABRT. Who is main user of Fedora? Developer (who may prefer coredumpctl) or normal user (who may prefer bug reporting tool)? > >