On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Ron Olson wrote:
> Aloha all-
>
> I’m Ron Olson, with the nickname tachoknight. I have been using Unix since
> 1989 and Linux since about 1992, when we somehow got an early version to run
> on a Gateway2000 machine.
Welcome!
> I have submitted for review an updat
On 11/14/2016 06:10 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2016 12:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
We currently call /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive from
%__os_install_post. This removes debugging symbols from static (.a)
libraries.
Is this really a good idea? Due to this, gli
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:40:43AM +, Thomas Spura wrote:
> The current dependencies are:
> # dnf repoquery --whatrequires zeromq2 --alldeps
> perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-0:1.09-7.fc23.x86_64
> perl-ZeroMQ-0:0.23-11.fc23.x86_64
> zeromq2-devel-0:2.2.0-14.fc23.i686
> zeromq2-devel-0:2.2.0-14.fc23.x86_64
>
After examining carefully the upstream status of each of these packages, all of
the original projects are dead currently, however I'll drop the ones that do
not have an active fork and keep the rest and change the sources to a fork.
Thus orphaning:
python-django-roa
python-django-profile
python-
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
Hi,
At this point, nothing uses mozjs31, so I'm going to retire it in
Rawhide and orphan for F24 / F25. It was used by 0 A.D. (the reason
why we packaged it), but nowadays upstream migrated to mozjs38.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@l
Le 10/11/2016 à 16:32, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php71
>
> I plan to build it (7.1.0RC6 which should be the last RC before 7.1.0)
> next week.
>
> All extensions should be compatible.
> I will take care of the mass rebuild.
Mass rebuild done:
On 11/14/2016 11:54 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At this point, nothing uses mozjs31, so I'm going to retire it in
> Rawhide and orphan for F24 / F25. It was used by 0 A.D. (the reason
> why we packaged it), but nowadays upstream migrated to mozjs38.
Hi Igor,
Can you transfer it to me plea
On Sunday, November 13, 2016 4:28:26 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm having.
>
> I keep getting this email:
> >orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> >On ppc64le:
> >orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch re
Since I like to use terminal a lot, I would prefer if you keep it short!
If you must include branding I would prefer shorter version of "Fed" or "fed"
so ideally something like "fed12345".
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
> Since I like to use terminal a lot, I would prefer if you keep it short!
>
> If you must include branding I would prefer shorter version of "Fed" or
> "fed" so ideally something like "fed12345".
Shorter hostname is not only useful when typing commands, but anywhere else
where it is used. For e
Nick Clifton writes:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> We (the tools team at Red Hat) are working on a project to add
> annotations to ELF binaries, so that we can answer various questions
> about them. We have set up a wiki page about the project here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Toolchain/Wat
As a follow up, I opened ticket to add compressed debug section support
to RPM [1] and asked Ruby upstream to make this flag configurable [2].
Vít
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394759
[2] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12934
Dne 10.11.2016 v 16:25 Vít Ondruch napsal(a
On 11/11/2016 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 08:33 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for
>> stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play well with
>> open-source (for example, swit
On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/16 14:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for
>> stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play well with
>> open-source (for example, switching to wif
On 11/13/2016 03:38 AM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/16 20:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 18:26 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>>> Oh..! Now I see why the new didn't reach me, I'm not in the legal
>>> list.
>>> So, Fedora 25 will come with MP3 decoders by default, right? Th
On 11/13/2016 02:01 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> To me, the default hostname should be fedora-xx. There are thousands if not
> millions of computers using Fedora so it's quite anonymous.
> I don't think copying Windows behaviour is a good idea, they aren't known for
> their security
>
Well, in or
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 11/14/2016 11:54 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> At this point, nothing uses mozjs31, so I'm going to retire it in
>> Rawhide and orphan for F24 / F25. It was used by 0 A.D. (the reason
>> why we packaged it), but nowadays upstream m
On 11/12/2016 01:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 11 November 2016 at 22:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:20:26PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
I can't think of
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 08:33 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for
>>> stuffing their machines with hardware from ve
>>> On 11/10/2016 09:42 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
>>> In this bug
>>>
>>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360797
>>>
>>> It is implied that rpkg has an unspecified problem with GitPython 2.0.
>>>
>>> This is preventing the maintainer from updating to the any GitPython 2
>>> release.
>>
On 11/12/2016 12:03 AM, Glen Turner wrote:
>
>> RFC 2606[1] reserves several TLDs that may never be registered for
>> public usage. Out of those, going with
>> Fedora-.localhost
>> seems like the best bet.
>
> The *reason* localhost is a reserved name is to discourage its use in
> DNS na
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On 11/10/2016 09:42 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
In this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360797
It is implied that rpkg has an unspecified problem with GitPython 2.0.
This is preventing the
Le 14/11/2016 à 12:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
> For now, interbase and pdo_firebird extensions are FTBFS, since Firebird
> 3, so I have disabled the sub-package, under investigation.
Fixed.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
Start Date: 2016-11-07 10:08:01.526840
End Date: 2016-11-14 10:08:01.526840
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376932
python3-markupsafe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370533
python-django-pgjson
https://bug
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
14 packages were orphaned
-
GLee [f23, master, f25, f24] was orphaned by hicham
GL Easy Extension library
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/GLee
authd [f2
On Mon, 14.11.16 08:13, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> One way to address this might be for systemd to provide an API for what
> Lennart
> is suggesting and market that as "the correct way to generate a
> machine-id-derived string".
>
> Basically, I see the function looking som
Here are three packages, none of them using %{?_isa} in their spec files:
(a) libvirt
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libvirt.git/tree/libvirt.spec
(b) libguestfs
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libguestfs.git/tree/libguestfs.spec
(c) qemu http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/c
OLD: Fedora-25-20161113.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161114.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
On 11/14/2016 09:05 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 14.11.16 08:13, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> One way to address this might be for systemd to provide an API for what
>> Lennart
>> is suggesting and market that as "the correct way to generate a
>> machine-id-deriv
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Here are three packages, none of them using %{?_isa} in their spec files:
>
> (a) libvirt
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libvirt.git/tree/libvirt.spec
> (b) libguestfs
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libguestfs.
> Thoughts on how to generate these random strings are of course up for
> discussion. Given that initial machine creation may have limited available
I am fighting against human unreadable names in hostnames (specifically in
datacenters) and I created a little tool [1] that generates human readabl
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:55:48 PM CET Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> First off, the guidelines have:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_unported_dependencies
>
> I've been assuming that you're talking about the BuildRequires: case.
> If you're just talking
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161113.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161114.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 55
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
> [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> but I only got one recording. That's not quite enough to call it a dataset,
> let alone do any analysis on it. Please do consider the minimal effort
> required on your behalf.]
>
> Are you using a touchpad frequently du
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Josh Boyer
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 13:31 -0800, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2016-11-1
0/f25-final-gono-go-meeting.2016-11-10-17.00.log.html
>>>
>>> >
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for
> stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play well with
> open-source (for example, switching to wifi-only devices and shipping Broadcom
> c
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161113.n.0):
ID: 48050 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/48050
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:55:48 PM CET Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> First off, the guidelines have:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_unported_dependencies
>>
>> I've been assuming that you're talk
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Certainly. My point is that I don't feel that we are necessarily responsible
> for
> working around their antagonism either. Yes, it would be nice if Fedora
> supported all hardware ever made. But the simple truth is that Apple tries
>
- Original Message -
> Greetings.
>
> Due to https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1639 we have orphaned 2 packages
> that need a new point of contact:
>
> rpms/authd -- A RFC 1413 ident protocol daemon ( master f25 f24 f23 )
> rpms/python-gudev -- Python (PyGObject) bindings to the GUD
On 11/10/2016 10:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
FWIW, I did not really get the sense at all that people were voting for
it as a blocker purely on the grounds that "we can get a fix in at the
last minute". A one week slip might feel short to you, I dunno, but I
think most release process people t
On 14 November 2016 at 12:06, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 10:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> FWIW, I did not really get the sense at all that people were voting for
> it as a blocker purely on the grounds that "we can get a fix in at the
> last minute". A one week slip might feel s
On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 05:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Hi,
FYI, Neal Gompa has now put up a Copr with the DNF + Python 3 version of the
livecd-tools:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/livecd-creator/
This is interesting news for me. I'm a long time user (in an employed
capacity
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:17 PM, John Florian wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 05:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> FYI, Neal Gompa has now put up a Copr with the DNF + Python 3 version of the
> livecd-tools:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/livecd-creator/
>
>
>
> This is i
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 61/101 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20161113.n.0):
ID: 48111 Test: x86_64 Everything-boo
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> using a 2010 Macbook Pro installing F25 beta does work without errors.
What's the filename of the ISO you're testing and how was the install
media created? I don't know that it matters, but we should track it in
case it's
Is anybody around who can check what's going on with a PPC64 build
that appears to be stuck? I noticed that fflas-ffpack has not built
successfully on ppc64 recently, so I kicked off a scratch build last
night to try to diagnose the problem. It finished fairly quickly on
ppc64le, but is still go
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:03:33PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Is anybody around who can check what's going on with a PPC64 build
> that appears to be stuck? I noticed that fflas-ffpack has not built
> successfully on ppc64 recently, so I kicked off a scratch build last
> night to try to diagnose
I will give it a try I am sure i will be making a new batch of updated
F24 lives later this week
--
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:35:37 -0500
From: Neal Gompa
Subject: Re: Announcement: Python 3 port of livecd-creator (was: Re:
Announcement: DNF port of livecd-
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 12:06 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 10:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > FWIW, I did not really get the sense at all that people were voting
> > for
> > it as a blocker purely on the grounds that "we can get a fix in at
> > the
> > last minute". A one week s
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> And you do hit the bug with Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25-1.2.iso ?
Ahh OK so nevermind.
Plus also this was a dual disk installation that almost certainly
excluded the volume macOS is on, because it wouldn't have been
selected as a des
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:01:07AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> So I assert that while support for Apple hardware is desirable, I don't
> believe
> that the lack of it should prevent us from shipping Fedora for all the other
> hardware that we do support.
Hi,
That is exactly what I was tryi
Hi,
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:03:33PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>
> puiterwijk possibly.
Yes.
For now, you can just ping me on IRC, or create a ticket on
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure to get a PPC64(LE) instance on our
Infrastructure cloud.
In the near future, we hope to open up
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 12:35 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:17 PM, John Florian
mailto:john.flor...@dart.biz>> wrote:
On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 05:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Hi,
FYI, Neal Gompa has now put up a Copr with the DNF + Python 3 version of the
livecd-tools:
https
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:03:33 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> Is anybody around who can check what's going on with a PPC64 build
> that appears to be stuck? I noticed that fflas-ffpack has not built
> successfully on ppc64 recently, so I kicked off a scratch build last
> night to try to diagnose the
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:03:33 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> Is anybody around who can check what's going on with a PPC64 build
> that appears to be stuck? I noticed that fflas-ffpack has not built
> successfully on ppc64 recently, so I kicked off a scratch build last
> night to try to diagnose the
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:03:33 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> Is anybody around who can check what's going on with a PPC64 build
> that appears to be stuck? I noticed that fflas-ffpack has not built
> successfully on ppc64 recently, so I kicked off a scratch build last
> night to try to diagnose the
2016-11-14 14:01 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher :
> On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/11/16 14:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for
>>> stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play we
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2016-11-14 14:01 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher :
>> On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/11/16 14:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for
stuff
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 07:40:21PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> This is Luya Tshimbalanga, one of Fedora Design Team member. I am
> sending you the data you need.
thanks, much appreciated. I should've mentioned: please reply to me off-list
with the data, no need to load up devel@
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:45:10AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> > but I only got one recording. That's not quite enough to call it a dataset,
> > let alone do any analysis on it. Please do consider the minimal effort
> >
2016-11-14 22:26 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-14 14:01 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher :
>>> On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
On 11/11/16 14:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Just to address this specificall
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 22:13 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> It not only means
> that the work people did developing and testing the features where
> wasted
The change in question clearly was *not* tested as regards OS X,
because the logic is very clearly broken and could not possibly have
worked pro
2016-11-14 22:57 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 22:13 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> It not only means
>> that the work people did developing and testing the features where
>> wasted
>
> The change in question clearly was *not* tested as regards OS X,
> because the logic is ver
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> If the features were developed and tested during the creation of the
> release, why would they fail criteria at the last minute?
Bit rot. That particular code is being modified, and there's no
testing on hardware affected by those changes befo
Anyone else seeing errors like this?
reading sources... [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D
reading sources... [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic2D
Sphinx Documentation subprocess failed with return code -11
I'm seeing it on ppc64 with python-astropy - filed
h
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:57:14 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Anyone else seeing errors like this?
>
> reading sources... [ 27%]
> api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D reading sources...
> [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic2D Sphinx
> Documentation subprocess failed wi
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:52:15PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> AFAIK, you have been able to install Fedora on Intel Macs since 2008
> (that was when I first tried). To not be able to install Fedora on
> (Intel) Macs is a regression.
>
> > Also, there is a large difference between shipping a rele
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 14:30 -0800, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > If the features were developed and tested during the creation of the
> > release, why would they fail criteria at the last minute?
>
> Bit rot. That particular code is being modified
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-11-15 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
On Monday 14 November 2016 02:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Do you suggest that gcc should invoke ld with -S, unless gcc was invoked
> with some -g flags or -s?
Ideal behaviour would be to make ld smarter about debuginfo but I don't
know if that is doable, so this should do.
>> Otherwise we need
On Monday, November 14, 2016 4:37:57 PM CET Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:55:48 PM CET Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> First off, the guidelines have:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#N
2016-11-15 1:06 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:52:15PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> AFAIK, you have been able to install Fedora on Intel Macs since 2008
>> (that was when I first tried). To not be able to install Fedora on
>> (Intel) Macs is a regression.
>>
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 07:35 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> If something is in the release criteria I expect the feature to be
> present in the release. If the feature in question has worked for ~20
> Fedora releases it is not my first priority to test, unless there is
> specific communication otherw
76 matches
Mail list logo
