On 07/31/2016 06:29 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
Kevin has already given a detailed information how longer it took to
retire these packages. Also see this
https://fedoramagazine.org/systemd-converting-sysvinit-scripts/
Take that article with a grain of salt since it's written by somebody
that has
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 09:11 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 07/31/2016 06:29 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>
> > Kevin has already given a detailed information how longer it took to
> > retire these packages. Also see this
> > https://fedoramagazine.org/systemd-converting-sysvinit-scripts/
>
>
On 07/31/2016 03:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
why such hurry ?
There has been a more than enough time for this migration to happen
already and now it's existence has started to hinder other changes and
adoptions in the distribution.
The initial target was for the feature completion was F20 o
On 08/02/2016 09:24 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 09:11 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/31/2016 06:29 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
Kevin has already given a detailed information how longer it took to
retire these packages. Also see this
https://fedoramagazine.org/systemd-c
On 08/02/2016 12:25 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's a burden, usually solved by ignoring one or the other. Since
systemd is always incompatible and always will be incompatible with
anything but relatively modern Linux distrubitutions, guess which
packages never get ported to non-Linux systems.
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 10:09 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
> On 08/02/2016 09:24 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 09:11 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> >> On 07/31/2016 06:29 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> >>
> >>> Kevin has already given a detailed information how longer it
On 08/02/2016 10:23 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
I do not actually have to prove anything, in a welcoming community you
give the beneit of the doubt that people researched and know what they
are talking about and you stick to actual fact in whatever they produce,
not to some badge of credentials that
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 10:37 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
> On 08/02/2016 10:23 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > I do not actually have to prove anything, in a welcoming community you
> > give the beneit of the doubt that people researched and know what they
> > are talking about and you stic
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 61/79 (x86_64), 14/16 (i386)
ID: 26954 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 58/74 (x86_64), 13/15 (i386)
ID: 26865 Test: x86_64 Everyth
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 12:25 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> It's a burden, usually solved by ignoring one or the other. Since
>> systemd is always incompatible and always will be incompatible with
>> anything but relatively modern Linux dist
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
> wrote:
>> On 08/02/2016 12:25 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> It's a burden, usually solved by ignoring one or the other. Since
>>> systemd is always incompatible and always wil
On Qua, 2016-08-03 at 00:11 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/02/2016 12:25 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It's a burden, usually solved by ignoring one or the other. Since
> > > systemd is always incompa
Hi,
it seems that the hfsplus-tools package arbitrary renames its
executables. This prevents kde-partitionmanager to fully support HFS+.
I've opened a bug [1] for this, but I received no answer.
Anyone knows why those executables are renamed?
Thanks
Mattia
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> it seems that the hfsplus-tools package arbitrary renames its executables.
> This prevents kde-partitionmanager to fully support HFS+.
> I've opened a bug [1] for this, but I received no answer.
>
> Anyone knows why those executables are renam
15 matches
Mail list logo
