On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson > <johan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 08/02/2016 12:25 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >>> It's a burden, usually solved by ignoring one or the other. Since >>> systemd is always incompatible and always will be incompatible with >>> anything but relatively modern Linux distrubitutions, guess which >>> packages never get ported to non-Linux systems. >> >> >> Actually in many cases upstreams that are targeting different types of *nix >> dont ship initscripts et all but instead have downstream ship those instead >> as an upstream policy ( we had few rejection of type unit files from >> upstream based on that ) so I'm unsure how much of a burden that really is. > > The first one that leaps to mind as publishing init scripts in their > main source code, and no support for systemd, is OpenSSH. That's > fairly understandable the base operating system for OpenSSH is > OpenBSD. > > The second critical daemon that provides SysV init scripts and > includes no systemd support in the upstream source code is httpd. > > Do I really need to dig further?
Those do get ported. I didn't mean to be confusing. "buildbot", the Python based build tool, is unlikely to ever be ported. Not that it's a very good tool, but it remains additionally unlikely to be ported due to the extra burden of having to provide system admin provided systemd integration. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
