On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 05:40 +, Ralf Senderek wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> for all who wish to add reliable encryption and authentication
> services to their projects with ease, I'd like to draw your
> attention to cryptlib, which is available in F23, F24, rawhide
> and EPEL 7 stable reposito
pcre2-10.22-RC1 changes libpcre2-posix library ABI and thus its SONAME
from libpcre2-posix.so.0() to libpcre2-posix.so.1().
I believe no other Fedora packages uses libpcre2-posix library,
therefore I push the package into rawhide without any special measures.
Because of the ABI change, older Fedor
On 2016-07-04 00:11, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Between my $dayjob, other foss projects and last but not
least spending time with my wife and children I'm way too busy
lately.
So I'm trying to find a new home for the packages I maintain
pretty much anything on the point of contact list here i
Also, hasn't this been already discussed on the python-devel Fedora
mailing list?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3VYLAL22YPA7BSRTMRGAIAXKHXRFRGBF/
On 07/02/2016 12:13 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
- Original Message -
So, the "pro
Hi,
my name is Ondřej Lysoněk and I am a new intern in the development team
at Red Hat in Brno, Czech Republic. I'm 21 and I'm currently studying at
the Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University. Formerly I worked in a
QA team, also at Red Hat.
Ondřej Lysoněk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
> From: "Stephen John Smoogen"
>
> Do you want to drop dnf from epel since it is so old?
No, we actually plan to update it when RHEL7.3 is released. The method
of DNF external COPR repository is more complicated to setup but encouraged
as it most probably will be updated more often than the vers
Hi guys,
I plan to take over sstp-client package [1] which has been orphaned two
months ago in F24+. It is required by my new package -
NetworkManager-sstp [2].
[1] - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/sstp-client/
[2] -
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/NetworkMa
Hi!
We have just removed the dependency generator from the proposal [0], see
diff [1].
The implementation of it (backported from RPM upstream) is significantly
lacking: Python dependencies are most usually found in setup.py and
requirements.txt files, whereas the dependency generator only ta
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160703.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160704.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 33
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.71 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
On 04-07-16 05:46, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2016-07-03 at 21:15 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'll take hedgewars as my kids still play it from time to time.
Thanks,
Richard
FAS: hobbes1069
I'll take childsplay , for similar reason :) and also because I found
updates in https://savannah
Hi,
On 04-07-16 04:15, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'll take hedgewars as my kids still play it from time to time.
Thanks,
Richard
FAS: hobbes1069
Handed over, thanks for picking this up.
Regards,
Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/li
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Golang 1.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.7
Change owner(s):
* Jakub Čajka
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.7 in Fedora 25, including
rebuild of all dependent packages.
== Detailed Description ==
Rebase of Golang package to upc
Hi,
On 04-07-16 08:26, Benjamin Lefoul wrote:
Oh, can I take gcompris? My daughter loves it... FAS: lef
Handed over, thanks for picking this up.
Note gcompris needs some special handling, you need to
test the water-cycle and hydro/solar/wind power activities
every now and then since they have
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We have just removed the dependency generator from the proposal [0], see
> diff [1].
>
> The implementation of it (backported from RPM upstream) is significantly
> lacking: Python dependencies are most usually found in setup.py and
> re
= Proposed Self Contained Change: HTCondor 8.6 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HTCondor86
Change owner(s):
* Ben Cotton
Upgrade the condor-* packages to the latest stable release series (8.6), due
to be released near the end of the summer. HTCondor [1] is a job scheduler and
resource
Hi,
On 04-07-16 08:34, Vojtěch Trefný wrote:
I'd like to take freecol, love this game. FAS: vtrefny
Handed over, thanks for picking this up.
Regards,
Hans
Thanks.
--
Vojtech Trefny
On 07/04/2016 12:11 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Between my $dayjob, other foss projects and las
Hi,
On 04-07-16 11:21, Michael Šimáček wrote:
On 2016-07-04 00:11, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Between my $dayjob, other foss projects and last but not
least spending time with my wife and children I'm way too busy
lately.
So I'm trying to find a new home for the packages I maintain
pretty m
= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby on Rails 5.0 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_5.0
Change owner(s):
* Jun Aruga
* Pavel Valena
* Vít Ondruch
* Ruby SIG
Ruby on Rails 5.0 is the latest version of well known web framework written in
Ruby.
== Detailed Description ==
T
= Proposed System Wide Change: SSSD fast cache for local users =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSSDCacheForLocalUsers
Change owner(s):
* Stephen Gallagher
* Jakub Hrozek
Enable resolving all users through the sss NSS modules for better performance.
== Detailed Description ==
SSSD shi
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 23/84 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386)
ID: 24608 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/24608
ID: 24611 Te
= Proposed System Wide Change: Unicode 9.0 support =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unicode_9.0
Change owner(s):
* Mike Fabian
* Pravin Satpute
* Carlos O'Donell
Unicode 9.0 [1] got released on 21th June 2016. Version 9.0 adds 7,500
characters, including six new scripts and 72 new emo
I don't exactly know where to post this, but I guess I have everyone's
attention on this thread.
Attached are patches which work for me. They could really do with
review from someone who knows what they're doing. They also need much
more testing than I've done, but I'll be doing that myself late
On 2016-07-01, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-07-01, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> On 2016-06-29, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>> We could download root.logs from Koji and grep them for "Package
>>> perl-4:\S* is already installed, skipping". That should provide some
>>> data.
> [...]
>> the logs cannot be used for t
Hi
Upstream has moved licensecheck to a new stand-alone package and removed
it from devscripts-2.16.6 onwards.
I've packaged licensecheck, along with a dependency, review requests are
here:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666 :
perl-Pod-Constants - Include constants from
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 25 Rawhide 20160704.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
14 packages were orphaned
-
dbmail [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7, el5] was orphaned by kevin
A database backed mail storage system
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:34 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I don't exactly know where to post this, but I guess I have everyone's
> attention on this thread.
>
> Attached are patches which work for me. They could really do with
> review from someone who knows what they're doing. They also ne
> On 07/04/2016 07:40 AM, Ralf Senderek wrote:
> Do you have suggestions how to comply with the anti-SaaS part of the
> cryptlib license in an automated fashion?
There is no "anti-SaaS part of the cryptlib license" The additional
clarification states that
there cannot be any exception to the re
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:20:32 -0600
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>> The questions then, are:
>> - Have we reached the pinnacle notification method of blocker bugs to
>> maintainers? Or is there a better way to do this?
>
> Well, I act
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 05:40 +, Ralf Senderek wrote:
>
> But it would be code that will not comply with Fedora's crypto policies
> [0].
The crypto policies state:
"Since Fedora 21 (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CryptoPolicy) there are
policies for the usage of SSL and TLS cryptogr
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:34 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I don't exactly know where to post this, but I guess I have everyone's
> > attention on this thread.
> >
> > Attached are patches which work for me. They could reall
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:34:22PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I don't exactly know where to post this, but I guess I have everyone's
> attention on this thread.
>
> Attached are patches which work for me. They could really do with
> review from someone who knows what they're doing. They
Hi,
Unfortunately I find myself having to orphan these packages:
* msp430-binutils
* msp430-gcc
* msp430-libc
* msp430mcu
* mspdebug
When I originally brought them into Fedora, I was doing a fair amount of msp430
firmware development. Now almost everything I do is Cortex-M based, so I don'
On Monday, July 4, 2016 6:02:52 PM CDT Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> Upstream has moved licensecheck to a new stand-alone package and removed
> it from devscripts-2.16.6 onwards.
>
> I've packaged licensecheck, along with a dependency, review requests are
> here:
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-07-05 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:25:36 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Do we actually *need* the second patch if we have the first? I mean, my
suggestion was just to do the first patch; if we do that, do we
actually need to worry about making the relabel happen any earlier than
it currently does?
Ca
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 22:52 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:25:36 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Do we actually *need* the second patch if we have the first? I mean, my
> > suggestion was just to do the first patch; if we do that, do we
> > actually need to w
37 matches
Mail list logo
