On 30 May 2016 23:49, "Dan Book" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 06:51:20PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > So there's tmux, screen, curl, wget, and probably quite a few others
>> > that don't necessarily get daemonized that
On Fr, 2016-05-27 at 15:29 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 27/05/16 15:25, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> >> I am pretty sure we should consider it our duty as Fedora developers
> >> to improve the Linux platform, and I am pretty sure that properly
> >> cleaning
On Tue, 31.05.16 11:31, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> IMO systemd should allow to specify the KillUserProcesses policy
> separately for processes with/without controlling terminal. So you
> could ask systemd to zap any gnome process going wild on logout without
> breaking screen and
Hi
jboss-common-core package changes from LGPLv2+ and ASL 1.1 to ASL 2.0
and Public Domain
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 27.05.2016 15:57, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 27.05.16 08:09, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said:
>>> Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the
>>> server: better accounting, more transparency, log
Hello,
the page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tmpfiles.d
suggests to specify /run/%{name}/ directories and files in %files and
then says
Files placed in the subdirectories may be listed the same way
or omitted entirely as the files will be cleaned up on every
On 31 May 2016 at 11:10, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On 27.05.2016 15:57, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 27.05.16 08:09, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
> >
> >> Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said:
> >>> Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advanta
Hi
jboss-marshalling package changes from LGPLv2+ to ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi
jboss-vfs package changes from LGPLv2+ to ASL 2.0
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Di, 2016-05-31 at 11:56 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 31.05.16 11:31, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > IMO systemd should allow to specify the KillUserProcesses policy
> > separately for processes with/without controlling terminal. So you
> > could ask systemd to zap
Hi folks,
I am happy to announce, Frantisek Zatloukal did Fedora Developer Portal
package [1].
Issue for it on Fedora Developer Portal GitHub [2].
Feel free to comment and improve:)
Fedora Developer Portal looks like as an application on your Fedora system.
It requires an electron package, whic
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160530.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160531.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 52
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 546.26 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Branched 20160531.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 35/67 (x86_64), 9/16 (i386)
ID: 19800 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/
OLD: Fedora-24-20160530.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160531.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:14
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 47
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.56 MiB
Size of dropped packages:28.25 MiB
Hi Petr and Frantisek,
Are there future plans for developing this further, or is the goal just to have
the website running in an application-style window?
- Owen
- Original Message -
> Hi folks,
>
> I am happy to announce, Frantisek Zatloukal did Fedora Developer Portal
> package [1].
On Monday, May 30, 2016 5:31:58 PM CDT Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:28:59AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Koji Generates Installation Media =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KojiInstallMedia
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Jay Gre
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 9/73 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 19888 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/19888
ID: 19892 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uef
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> They usually have a 60 hour a week job
I hope this isn't accurate...?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
They usually have a 60 hour a week job
I hope this isn't accurate...?
I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH
programmers usually work 60 hours per
Hello!
I would like to ask for some help what to do with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324881 I've been
pondering it for some time, but I know too little to know what to do.
It's about the old amusement xpenguins. (A program showing small
penguins walking on the windows and jumpi
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
They usually have a 60 hour a week job
I hope this isn't accurate...?
I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyw
On 05/31/2016 11:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
> I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH
> programmers usually work 60 hours per week? "On average", full time means 40
> to 44 hours around the world. I've even seen 30 hours being called full time
> in some job pos
Hi Owen,
right now I wasn't thinking about other plans. Atm I am trying to get it
working correctly with Epiphany instead of Electron, so we would be able to
push the package into Fedora (this can take really long time, depends on how
Epiphany developers will be willing to help me).
--
Best re
Hello all,
I had previously sent out a RFC email about a month ago asking for
feedback on the Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines[0].
I was asked by FESCo to start a new thread so that this can be
discussed further on the devel mailing list before we discuss it in
FESCo. Therefore if there
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 18:54 +0200, Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to ask for some help what to do with
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324881 I've been
> pondering it for some time, but I know too little to know what to do.
>
> It's about the old amusement xpengui
Matthias Clasen:
> How did you determine that NotShowIn=GNOME; doesn't have any effect?
> It should work fine to hide xpenguins from the places where
> applications are normally listed in GNOME (the shell overview and
> search).
It should? Then I'll try it again; I probably made some kind of
mist
On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
They usually have a 60 hour a week job
I hope this isn't accurate...?
I didn't wri
On 05/27/2016 01:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between
a program that's zombie or unresponsive but isn't doing anything or is
unresponsive but is doing something; and if not then some way for
programs to say "hey wait just a minute, I nee
On 31 May 2016 18:02, "Major Hayden" wrote:
>
> On 05/31/2016 11:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
> > I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH
programmers usually work 60 hours per week? "On average", full time means
40 to 44 hours around the world. I've even seen 30 ho
On 05/31/2016 11:31 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
They usually have a 60 hour a week jo
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
> On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> > On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
> >> On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The
On 05/31/2016 11:56 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Ste
On 31 May 2016 at 12:39, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> They usually have a 60 hour a week job
>
> I hope this isn't accurate...?
I don't know. I was using an old data point where people in the US
software industry once you accounted
Lennart Poettering writes:
> Sorry, but systemd is pretty exactly this: a process babysitter.
It's becoming a user nanny instead. I wish it would stop trying to
enforce its "my way or the highway" approach to system rules. I've been
playing whack-a-mole trying to keep up with all the tweaks I
Lennart Poettering writes:
> Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes
> to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a
> privilieged concept. It should not be allowed for user code to stick
> around after logout, unless this is explicitly permitte
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:20 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering writes:
> > Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes
> > to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a
> > privilieged concept. It should not be allowed for user code to s
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Langdon White wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, I heard from some of the new voting members that the current
> Modularity WG meeting time is not doable for them. Please use the link below
> to help us figure out a new time.
>
> http://whenisgood.net/hzd7x2b
>
> Langdo
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:26 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> What if the Anaconda team changed it so the "Make this user an
> administrator" checkbox also enabled linger?
anaconda team is (rightly) opposed to anything like this, in terms of
magic code in anaconda that changes things. All that box doe
On May 31, 2016 15:44, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:26 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > What if the Anaconda team changed it so the "Make this user an
> > administrator" checkbox also enabled linger?
>
> anaconda team is (rightly) opposed to anything like this, in terms of
On 05/29/2016 05:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>> If there is a systematic
>> problem of badly written code leaving orphaned code running when
>> a user logs out, then that broken code should be fixed instead of
>> adding another layer of proc
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
Hello Till,
It seems that s3ql package was retired today however I took the
package on 2016-05-16 and update it week later, see BZ #1249301
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249301
Best regards.
- Athmane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedorap
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Athmane Madjoudj
wrote:
> Hello Till,
>
> It seems that s3ql package was retired today however I took the
> package on 2016-05-16 and update it week later, see BZ #1249301
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249301
I see now the issue (depends
DJ Delorie wrote:
Lennart Poettering writes:
Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes
to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a
privilieged concept. It should not be allowed for user code to stick
around after logout, unless this is explic
On May 31, 2016 3:24 PM, "Howard Chu" wrote:
>
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>>
>> Lennart Poettering writes:
>>>
>>> Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes
>>> to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a
>>> privilieged concept. It should not be al
On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 21:56 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
> smb4k (maintained by: sergiomb, rdieter)
> kde-plasma-smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires
> plasma4(scriptengine-declarativeappletscript) = 0.1
> smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires kdebase-runtime =
> 16.0
FYI, I have taken hardlink.
Co-maintainers as always welcome.
kevin
pgpa_wyYTa4VM.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315525
--- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters ---
revoked, investigating
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358
Bug ID: 1341358
Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dancer2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: dd...@cpan.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Dancer2-0.166001 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1163391
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163391&action=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual err
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366
Bug ID: 1341366
Summary: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.161520 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: dd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.160410 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1163403
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163403&action=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual err
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.19 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367
Bug ID: 1341367
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-F77
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: or...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1163404
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163404&action=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual err
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341368
Bug ID: 1341368
Summary: perl-Check-ISA-0.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Check-ISA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...@red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341362
Bug ID: 1341362
Summary: perl-Carp-Clan-6.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Carp-Clan
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...@red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341360
Bug ID: 1341360
Summary: perl-Capture-Tiny-0.42 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Capture-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341371
Bug ID: 1341371
Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.012 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-Cme
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...@redhat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341373
Bug ID: 1341373
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.54 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jpazdzi...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341374
Bug ID: 1341374
Summary: perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.26 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-ChangeNotify
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assign
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 21:56 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
>> smb4k (maintained by: sergiomb, rdieter)
>> kde-plasma-smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires
>> plasma4(scriptengine-declarativeappletscript) = 0.1
>> smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires kdebase-runtime = 16.04.1-1.fc2
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>>
>> Lennart Poettering writes:
>>>
>>> Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes
>>> to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a
>>> privilieged concept. It should not b
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:07:23PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 21:56 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
> >> smb4k (maintained by: sergiomb, rdieter)
> >> kde-plasma-smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires
> >> plasma4(scriptengine-declarativeappletscript) =
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> FYI, I have taken hardlink.
>
> Co-maintainers as always welcome.
Hi Kevin,
I'm a beginner, but maybe I can help you.
Best regards,
Tsao
--
Francisco Javier Tsao Santín
http://gattaca.es
1024D/71CF4D62 42 F1 53 35 EF 98 98 8A FC 6C 56 B3 4C A7 7D
72 matches
Mail list logo
