Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-27 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
It is actually documented here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F24_bugs#DNF_might_remove_essential_system_packages_if_you_used_PackageKit_.28GNOME_Software.2C_KDE_Apper.29_in_the_past - Original Message - From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" S

F25 Self Contained Change: Koji Generates Installation Media

2016-05-27 Thread Jan Kurik
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Koji Generates Installation Media = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KojiInstallMedia Change owner(s): * Jay Greguske Extend Koji with a new feature that allows users to create installation media for various architectures. == Detailed Description == This

Packages to be Retired because of Broken Dependencies (2016-05-27)

2016-05-27 Thread opensource
The following packages have broken dependencies and will be retired on 2016-05-31 (Final Freeze for Fedora 24) unless someone fixes them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_

Re: Packages to be Retired because of Broken Dependencies (2016-05-27)

2016-05-27 Thread Kalev Lember
On 05/27/2016 10:53 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote: > The following packages have broken dependencies and will be retired > on 2016-05-31 (Final Freeze for Fedora 24) unless someone fixes them. If you > know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a > proper reason: > htt

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-27)

2016-05-27 Thread Parag Nemade
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-05-27 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below c

jdeparser license changes

2016-05-27 Thread gil
Hi jdeparser package changes from (CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions) and MIT to ASL 2.0 regards .g -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Dominique Martinet
Hi, Just noticed this change on rawhide... https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes that are part of the user session scope unit (session-XX.scope) when the user logs out. This behavior is controlled by the Kill

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160527.n.0 changes

2016-05-27 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160526.n.1 NEW: Fedora-24-20160527.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:10 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed this change on rawhide... > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 > * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes that are > part of the user session scope unit (session-XX.sco

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 05/27/2016 11:51 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Just noticed this change on rawhide... > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 > * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes that are > part of the user session scope unit (session-XX.scope) when the user

Fedora 24-20160527.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 8/66 (x86_64), 4/16 (i386) ID: 19199 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default UR

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:51:42AM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed this change on rawhide... > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 > * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes that are > part of the user session scope unit (sessi

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the > server: better accounting, more transparency, logs are easier to read. > The (old) default of allowing left-over session processes to live on > seems especially bad on a s

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > This breaks the storage of ssh-agent credentials for te one-time > enabling of SSH credentials for access on running hosts. You mean you start ssh-agent somewhere during the first login and then access it from any process from f

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Tom Hughes
On 27/05/16 14:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: It's two lines: [Login]\nKillUserProcesses=no. But please consider switching to the new mode of using systemd-run instead. How do I run screen with systemd-run? I tried "systemd-run --user -t screen" but as soon as I detach from the scree

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:09:33AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the > > server: better accounting, more transparency, logs are easier to read. > > The (old) default of allowing

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/05/16 14:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > >It's two lines: [Login]\nKillUserProcesses=no. But please consider > >switching to the new mode of using systemd-run instead. > > How do I run screen with systemd-run? > > I t

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > You still can start a one-off task under screen, you just need to > invoke it in one the different ways described in > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-run.html#Examples This should not be made a default unless programs

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 27.05.16 08:09, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the > > server: better accounting, more transparency, logs are easier to read. > > The (old) default of allow

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said: > I am pretty sure we should consider it our duty as Fedora developers > to improve the Linux platform, and I am pretty sure that properly > cleaning up processes on logout is a step towards that, not against > it. When you "clean up" by killing things t

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Tom Hughes
On 27/05/16 14:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: On 27/05/16 14:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: It's two lines: [Login]\nKillUserProcesses=no. But please consider switching to the new mode of using systemd-run instead. H

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Tom Hughes
On 27/05/16 15:25, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said: I am pretty sure we should consider it our duty as Fedora developers to improve the Linux platform, and I am pretty sure that properly cleaning up processes on logout is a step towards that, not against it. When

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Tom Hughes said: > On 27/05/16 15:25, Chris Adams wrote: > >When you "clean up" by killing things that are designed to run after > >logout, you are being over-zealous. It is incumbent upon you to fix > >your cleanup methods to handle this case, not the thousands of users > >to c

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:26:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/05/16 14:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > >>On 27/05/16 14:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> > >>>It's two lines: [Login]\nKillUserProcesses=no. But p

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Tom Hughes
On 27/05/16 15:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:26:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> Which works fine except that the scope remains even after the screen >> has exited... > > Hm, it shouldn't I think. Seems to work fine here. How > are you running the command and

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Tom Hughes
On 27/05/16 16:04, Tom Hughes wrote: On 27/05/16 15:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:26:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: Which works fine except that the scope remains even after the screen has exited... Hm, it shouldn't I think. Seems to work fine here. How are

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:36:58AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Tom Hughes said: > > On 27/05/16 15:25, Chris Adams wrote: > > >When you "clean up" by killing things that are designed to run after > > >logout, you are being over-zealous. It is incumbent upon you to fix > > >your

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/05/16 15:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:26:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: >> >>> Which works fine except that the scope remains even after the screen >>> has exited... >> >> Hm, it shouldn't I think. Se

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Neal Becker
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:09:33AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: >> > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the >> > server: better accounting, more transparency, logs are easier t

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > Either the scope code is buggy or has IMO very strange behavior: > > $ systemd-run --user --scope echo foo > Running scope as unit run-4980.scope. > foo > > $ systemctl --user status run-4980.scope > ● run-4980.scope - /usr/bin/echo foo

Re: Fedora lists From munging/DMARC (Was: audio problems)

2016-05-27 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2016 16:42:05 +0200 > Dominique Martinet wrote: > > ...snip... > >> The question is, should fedora's lists be configured to rewrite the >> from ? I'm pretty sure mailman 3.1 can handle it, if we want it to. >> >> I haven't seen

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:06:36PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/05/16 16:04, Tom Hughes wrote: > >On 27/05/16 15:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:26:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> > >>>Which works fine except that the scope remains even after the screen

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 May 2016 15:54:34 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > The problem was that samba-client-libs was dependent on > libsystemd-daemon.so, which has been replaced by libsystemd.so. > It was recompiled on the 23rd, but it's not available in rawhide. > Something strange is going on her

Re: Fedora lists From munging/DMARC (Was: audio problems)

2016-05-27 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Andrew Lutomirski said: > Unfortunately, gmail and others are blazing ahead with breaking > everything before ARC will be ready. To be fair, Google is just enforcing what others ask them to enforce. Yahoo is the one that is setting a DMARC record that says to reject messages wit

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 15:54 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > The problem was that samba-client-libs was dependent on > libsystemd-daemon.so, which has been replaced by libsystemd.so. > It was recompiled on the 23rd, but it's not available in rawhide. > Something strange is going on he

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:05:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's easy to know when this is the case, as the 'compose report' mails > are sent to this very list...there is always a 'compose report' when a > compose completes, so if you don't see one for a few days, it means > composes are fai

Re: Fedora lists From munging/DMARC (Was: audio problems)

2016-05-27 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Andrew Lutomirski said: >> Unfortunately, gmail and others are blazing ahead with breaking >> everything before ARC will be ready. > > To be fair, Google is just enforcing what others ask them to enforce. > Yahoo is the one t

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Björn Persson
Dominique Martinet wrote: > Just noticed this change on rawhide... > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 > * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes that are > part of the user session scope unit (session-XX.scope) when the user > logs out. This be

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-27 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > It is actually documented here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F24_bugs#DNF_might_remove_essential_system_packages_if_you_used_PackageKit_.28GNOME_Software.2C_KDE_Apper.29_in_the_past > > Thanks, I updated Bug 1259865 with

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Martin Kolman
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 18:15 +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Dominique Martinet wrote: > > > > Just noticed this change on rawhide... > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 > >   * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes > > that are > > part of the user

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 06:15:08PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Dominique Martinet wrote: > > Just noticed this change on rawhide... > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 > > * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes that are > > part of the user se

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Christopher
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:58 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 27.05.16 08:09, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > > > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the > > > server: better accounting, more

Fedora 24 Final Freeze (2016-05-31)

2016-05-27 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Hi all, Tuesday May 31st 2016 is an important day on the Fedora 24 schedule[1], with significant cut-offs. Tuesday is the Final Freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final composes. Other

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Rich Mattes
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 06:15:08PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: >> Dominique Martinet wrote: >> > Just noticed this change on rawhide... >> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 >> > * systemd-logind will

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:09:33AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: >> > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the >> > server: better accounting, mor

Fedora Rawhide-20160527.n.1 compose check report

2016-05-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Server dvd i386 Server boot x86_64 Server dvd x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 2/6 (x86_64), 1/1 (i386) ID: 19280

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2016-05-27 Thread buildsys
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires libperl.s

Broken dependencies: perl-TryCatch

2016-05-27 Thread buildsys
perl-TryCatch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-TryCatch-1.003002-9.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-TryCatch-1.003002-9.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-TryCatch-1.003002-9.fc24.i686 requires libp

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-27 Thread James Hogarth
On 27 May 2016 17:29, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Charalampos Stratakis < cstra...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> It is actually documented here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F24_bugs#DNF_might_remove_essential_system_packages_if_you_used_PackageKit_.28GNOME_S

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-27 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:15 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On the bug you said a dnf reinstall ... that's not the best thing to do... > you need to dnf mark installed as per the earlier comments on the bug Wouldn't the reinstall accomplish that? I agree, the solution in the release notes is conc

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:05:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: It's easy to know when this is the case, as the 'compose report' mails are sent to this very list...there is always a 'compose report' when a compose completes, so if you don'

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> This breaks the storage of ssh-agent credentials for te one-time >> enabling of SSH credentials for access on running hosts. > > You mean you start ssh-agent

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote: It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between a program that's zombie or unresponsive but isn't doing anything or is unresponsive but is doing something; and if not then some way for programs to say "hey wait just a minute, I need

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Ben Rosser
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 06:15:08PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > >> Dominique Martinet wrote: > >> > Just noticed this change on rawhide... > >> > https://github.com/

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-27)

2016-05-27 Thread Parag Nemade
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-05-27) === Meeting started by paragan at 16:01:04 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-05-27/fesco.2016-05-27-16.01.log.html . Meeting summary -

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-27 Thread James Hogarth
On 27 May 2016 19:25, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:15 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On the bug you said a dnf reinstall ... that's not the best thing to do... you need to dnf mark installed as per the earlier comments on the bug > > > Wouldn't the reinstall accomplish