In past days I filled many review requests for various python libraries, in
order to submit python-netdiff [1] and python-django-netjsongraph [2].
During this process, I noticed that a lot of python packages are not
compliant to Fedora Guidelines for packaging Python stuff [3]. So you have
to deal
2016-02-06 9:44 GMT+01:00 Germano Massullo :
> In past days I filled many review requests for various python libraries, in
> order to submit python-netdiff [1] and python-django-netjsongraph [2].
> During this process, I noticed that a lot of python packages are not
> compliant to Fedora Guidelines
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160205
No images in Rawhide 20160205 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 13 of 63
ID: 5016Test: i
> On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged into f24,
> there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package
> maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.
Awesome! Two questions.
#1) I
Kevin Fenzi píše v Čt 04. 02. 2016 v 13:34 -0700:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for these package maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have t
Hi, guys,
Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to
use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of the
requisite libraries are not in what I have as the latest image, based
on Fedora 20 from the looks of the version encoded in both the image
and the
Il 06/02/2016 22:03, Nathanael Noblet ha scritto:
On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged into f24,
there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package
maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Les Howell wrote:
> Hi, guys,
> Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to
> use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of the
> requisite libraries are not in what I have as the latest image, based
> on Fedora 20 fr
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 14:03:36 -0700
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged
> > into f24, there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be
> > addressed by the package maintainers
To whom it may concern,
The license of python-pika has changed in 0.10.0 from MPLv1.1 or GPLv2
to 3 clause BSD. As this is a more permissive licensing structure,
there is no expectation of any new licensing conflicts arising from
this change.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
dev
10 matches
Mail list logo