> hi
> Taskotron depcheck test FAILED with
> springframework-data-mongodb-1.5.2-1.fc22 because of this
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-10965/springframework-data-commons-1.8.4-4.fc22?_csrf_token=afc764d7e468ff6e54a1c11c233dbd3d9b2bcf31
> so i should wait still a week for have
On 11/07/15 17:24, Haïkel wrote:
I fixed python-autopep8 as provenpackager.
Thank you! I had it on my plate and wanted to look at it today,
observing it was fixed already :D
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:05:24 PM
> Subject: RPM Weak Dependencies and the install media compose process
>
> (Please keep the conversation on the devel list;
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 22:53 -0500, Jon wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
> sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
...
> > From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to
> > go:
> >
> > 1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends:
> > pac
Hi
When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed
that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora
packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel
(some even use reverse patches).
%autosetup was created to handle that but
I think it's because no one told that it exists ;)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that
> there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages.
> Everyone is using %pat
Compose started at Mon Jul 13 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:ju
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
0 packages were orphaned
0 packages were retired
0 packages unorphaned
-
0 packages were unretired
0
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 14:39 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Is it because no one told that it exists? Or maybe because
> implementation has some issues which no one wants to fix? Or other (I
> exclude laziness of package maintainers)?
rpm macros only get used if they work on the oldest OS re
So, I'll reply here, but I'm replying in general to the thread not the
last post in particular. ;)
This topic seems to come up from time to time and we never really
"solve" it, but a mix of old and new ideas here I think has some
promise:
* There's movement to make an app for new package reviews
W dniu 13.07.2015 o 15:22, Adam Jackson pisze:
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 14:39 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Is it because no one told that it exists? Or maybe because
implementation has some issues which no one wants to fix? Or other (I
exclude laziness of package maintainers)?
rpm macros onl
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I
> noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it
> comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files
> of random patchlevel
On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I
>> noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it
>> comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is us
Hi,
it's quite new feature in rpmbuild:
http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Autosetup
I.e. since rpm-4.11.
Cheers,
Jindrich
On Jul 13, 2015 1:40 PM, "Marcin Juszkiewicz"
wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that
> there is no such thing as patch m
Agenda:
- define the minimal install
- define the docker base image
- minimal disk image for importing into libvirt
- generic installer?
- Open Floor
Please add items by replying to this mail.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
On 13.07.2015 16:40, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Agenda:
>
> - define the minimal install
> - define the docker base image
> - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt
> - generic installer?
> - Open Floor
>
> Please add items by replying to this mail.
>
s/June/July/g of course :-)
--
devel mai
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed
> that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to
> Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random
> patchlevel (some even use reverse patches).
>
> %autosetup
Is yum-utils going away, with dnf taking over?
--
Erik Johnson | Senior Engineer
3400 North Ashton Blvd, Suite 110 | Lehi, UT 84043
e...@saltstack.com | http://saltstack.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
Am 13.07.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Erik Johnson:
Is yum-utils going away, with dnf taking over?
looks so - it makes me so terrible angry that we have to face eacg year
half done replacements of perfectly fine things
[root@rawhide ~]# package-cleanup --leaves
Yum-utils package has been deprecat
BEDToolsverdurin 60 weeks ago
This has an annoying 'shrank by one' debuginfo problem and further
problems on 32-bit with recent GCC, but it is building on x86_64 now.
A bug has been filed regarding the problems and I'm pursuing them
upstream.
Adam
--
2015-07-13 16:20 GMT+02:00 Pádraig Brady :
>
> maybe pull `rdopkg update-patches` into `fedpkg` ?
>
>
That's more or less, what I'll be suggesting in my patch management session
at Flock ;)
btw, rdopkg now handles properly %autosetup \o/
H.
> cheers,
> Pádraig.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel
No it didn't work ...
http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png
Subject: Re: Hangs with pkgs GIT
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: pe...@thecodergeek.com
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:51:10 -0700
On 07/12/2015 10:38 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> Git hangs and didnt complete ...
>
> http://i.imgur.com/TyQ8I3
New Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242625
From: moc...@hotmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: RE: Hangs with pkgs GIT
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:28:13 +0200
No it didn't work ...
http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png
Subject: Re: Hangs with pkgs GIT
To: devel@lis
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not int
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I
> >> noticed that there is no such th
On 07/13/2015 12:11 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
New Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242625
It would be much more helpful to copy and paste from the terminal
instead of taking screenshots.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:28:13 +0200
مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> No it didn't work ...
>
> http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png
And it hangs there forever?
Can you ping pkgs.fedoraproject.org ?
I see logins from you, perhaps there's just some slow or difficult
network between you and pkgs.
kevin
pgpXfU
On Monday, July 13, 2015 09:13:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> When I moved to Fedora
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 15:21 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday, July 13, 2015 09:13:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Is anyone maintaining fedpkg now?
>
> fedpkg has active maintainership and development. does not mean
> that every corner case is know about of gets attention.
fedpkg m
Now it works !!
Was it server problem or software one ?!? Bug 1239384 FIXED
fedpkg clone barry
Cloning into 'barry'...
remote: Counting objects: 443, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (318/318), done.
remote: Total 443 (delta 200), reused 226 (delta 109)
Receiving objects: 100% (443/
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know
for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
During the review of cppformat, it was pointed out that it contained a font
that should be removed because it's packaged with Fedora (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279#c3 ). While working on
resolving this, I was looking into what package provided this font so I
could add the app
This is going to be pretty common for anything that uses the bootstrap CSS
framework, since glyphicons is bundled as part of it. I do not see much benefit
from packaging this separately, especially as the license for the glyphicons
halflings font included with bootstrap is MIT, but CC-BY from th
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/daveisfera/odb_2.4/build/102224/
What's the correct way to handle a single failed build on COPR? In the
above, it failed on F22 ppc64le. Will clicking resubmit rebuild on all of
the platforms? Or just the one that failed?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
deve
Hello Dave,
You will get the option which platform you want to have the rebuild
for, when you click resubmit.
IIRC even the platforms where the last build was successful will not
be selected by default.
Timotheus
On 14 July 2015 at 07:05, Dave Johansen wrote:
> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/co
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:05:01 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/daveisfera/odb_2.4/build/102224/
> What's the correct way to handle a single failed build on COPR? In the
> above, it failed on F22 ppc64le. Will clicking resubmit rebuild on
> all of the platforms? Or
36 matches
Mail list logo
