Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > Hello Dan, > > I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this question. > >> as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64 >> support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team) >> w

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

>> > as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64 >> > support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team) >> > would like to see a full bootstrap and subsequent update of % >> > mono_arches >> > >> > For any questions regarding secondary arches, please don't hes

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote: > Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to > rebuild all the packages that require mono. I've untagged this, it needs to be done on a side tag and then tagged in. Peter > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Moez Roy wrote: >> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to >> rebuild all the packages that require mono. >> >> -Thanks. >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote: >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to >> rebuild all the packages that require mono. > > I've untagged this, it needs to be done on a side tag and then tagged i

Anaconda goes Python 3

Hello everybody, as many of you probably know, Anaconda has been slowly moving to Python 3 in recent months. Originally targeting Fedora 22 we postponed the switch to Fedora 23 [1], but we would like to start as soon as possible. Actually, even before Fedora 22 is released, because from our previo

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote: > Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to > rebuild all the packages that require mono. I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/u

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote: >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to >> rebuild all the packages that require mono. > > I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:57:14 +0100 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson > wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy > > wrote: > >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to > >> rebuild all the packages that require mono. >

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:57:14 +0100 > Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson >> wrote: >> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy >> > wrote: >> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a

rawhide report: 20150518 changes

Compose started at Mon May 18 05:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [InsightToolkit] InsightToolkit-4.7.1-4.fc23.i686 requires libhdf5_cpp.so.9 InsightToolkit-4.7.1-4.fc23.i686 requires libhdf5.so.9 [OpenTK] OpenTK-

Re: Anaconda goes Python 3

On 18.5.2015 11:01, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > The F22 composes are at > https://m4rtink.fedorapeople.org/anaconda/images/python3/f22/ so feel > free to download and test them. Hi, what is the difference between latest and testing images? Which one should I test? Thanks for the summary and blo

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

Hello Peter, >> Peter, do you have a list what will be rebuilt? > > Not really, I would expect this to be provided by the Change owners. > > The core bits I've looked at are: > graphviz > avahi > > As they impact the rest of the distro. > > and a few other packages. There appears to be problems wi

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

Hello Dan, > first update > srpm builds fine on f22/s390x > mono segfaults when running monolite on f22/ppc64 > build runs well on f22/ppc64le (new arch) after adding ppc64le to the > ExclusiveArch list Thanks for trying it! I have added ppc64le in the spec file to the ExclusiveArch list. I wonde

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

Hello Peter, > I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken > which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/update > nant/dbus-sharp. I'm also rebuilding mono itself as a post boostrap > build. Just for me as clarification: so is the bootstrap process fin

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

>> Either way it looks like there is still quite a bit of work for the >> change owners to do before we can tag anything over to f23. >> >> Peter > > Thanks for looking into this and creating that tag f23-mono4 > > I received about 60 emails about failing packages. > > Claudio and myself have alrea

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > Hello Peter, > >> I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken >> which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/update >> nant/dbus-sharp. I'm also rebuilding mono itself as a post boostrap >> bu

Re: Anaconda goes Python 3

- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:25:31 PM > Subject: Re: Anaconda goes Python 3 > > > > On 18.5.2015 11:01, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > > The F22 composes are at > > https://m4rtink.fedorap

Self introduction: Fabien Boucher

Hello Folks, I've submitted two requests for review here: - Zuul : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451 - python-gear : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215046 As these are my two first packages I give you some quick information about me. I'm Fabien boucher, software e

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

Hello Peter, > It can, partially, but for the maintainers to know about your changes > you need to file bug reports in bugzilla, I suggest also you have a > mono4 tracking bug for all the bugs to block so it's easy for people > to track the status and help out as it's a central location. Good to k

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

> Do you intend to build and support mono4 in EPEL? Which versions. If > you've not done in EPEL it doesn't magically appear. Similarly you'll > need to file a ticket in the releng trac instance to get a side tag > for this. > > I strongly suggest you get it built and all sorted out in rawhide with

F23 System Wide Change: Netizen Spin

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Netizen_Spin Change owner(s): Corey Leong A Fedora Spin for promoting and supporting internet citizenship and citizen engagement. == Detailed Description == Fedora Netizen is an open source operating syste

F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

I am sorry for the wrong subject of my previous post. This is a Self Contained Change, not a System Wide. Regards, Jan - Original Message - > From: "Jan Kurik" > To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 2:26:55 PM > Subject: F23 System Wide Change: Netizen

F-22 Branched report: 20150518 changes

Compose started at Mon May 18 07:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [maven-wagon] maven-wagon-webdav-jackrabbit-2.8-1.fc22.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-webdav) [xorg-x11-drivers] xorg-x11-drivers-

Re: gcc5 C++11 ABI rebuilds and FTBFS packages

On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160 It looks like LyX forward-declares std::basic_string, which is (1) undefined behaviour and (2) not going to work now that std::string is really defined as std::__cxx11::basic_s

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Moez Roy wrote: > >> > >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to > >> rebuild all the packages that require mono. > >> > >

Re: gcc5 C++11 ABI rebuilds and FTBFS packages

On 18/05/15 13:39 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160 It looks like LyX forward-declares std::basic_string, which is (1) undefined behaviour and (2) not going to work now that std::

Re: gcc5 C++11 ABI rebuilds and FTBFS packages

On 18/05/15 13:42 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 18/05/15 13:39 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160 It looks like LyX forward-declares std::basic_string, which is (1) undefined b

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

>> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to >> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono. >> >> >> >> -Thanks. >> >> -- >> >> devel mailing list >> >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> Fedora Code of Cond

Re: gcc5 C++11 ABI rebuilds and FTBFS packages

On 05/18/2015 02:42 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 18/05/15 13:39 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160 It looks like LyX forward-declares std::basic_string, which is (1) undefined behaviour an

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to > >> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono. > >> >> > >> >> -Thanks. > >> >> -- > >> >> devel mailing list > >> >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> >> https:/

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 2 packages were orphaned mozilla-noscript [f22, f21, f20, master, el6, el5] was orphaned by tomspur JavaScript white list extension for Mozilla Firefox https://admin

[Base] Fedora Engineering update

Hi Base WG, As part of the on-going Council updates, I'm organizing a Fedora Engineering update. This includes the various WGs, rel-eng, infrastructure, and a few others. The idea behind this is to give a brief update of the work your group is doing towards the F23 and F24 releases. Think of th

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

On May 18, 2015 7:34 AM, "Jan Kurik" wrote: > > I am sorry for the wrong subject of my previous post. This is a Self Contained Change, not a System Wide. > > Regards, > Jan > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jan Kurik" > > To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Monday, May

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:50:44AM -0600, Pete Travis wrote: > A spin is a big effort with many interoperating packages and coordination > with other teams (primarily releng, but you should also seek guidance from > QA). It qualifies as a System Wide Change. Especially if this particular spin is

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

> Now, is it our task as the change owners to update each and every > package that depends on Mono? > We have done a lot of preparation work, but would welcome the package > owners to review our changes to the spec files and import them into > their packages... > Does it work like that? Procedural

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:50:44AM -0600, Pete Travis wrote: > > A spin is a big effort with many interoperating packages and coordination > > with other teams (primarily releng, but you should also seek guidance from > > QA). It qualifies as a System Wide Change. > > Especially if this particu

simplestreams json or index.asc for deliverables in the new list-of-deliverables?

FESCo Ticket #1427 formalizes the list of deliverables for each Fedora release. Cool. Let's go a step beyond this and make a machine-readable list, at least of image-based deliverables. One approach would be to use using Ubuntu's simplestreams format,

Re: gcc5 C++11 ABI rebuilds and FTBFS packages

Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 18/05/15 13:42 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>On 18/05/15 13:39 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>>On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160 >>> >>>It looks like LyX forward-declares std