> The only other approach I could see for the headless
> servers would be mandating the enrollment in an identity domain at
> installation time (such as to FreeIPA or Active Directory).
And in this scenario we should absolutely disable PermitRootLogin.
>>>
>>>
>>> So that
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:10:03AM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > Once upon a time, Jan Staněk said:
> > >> The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this l
Compose started at Sun Jan 11 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
2015-01-10 13:04 GMT+01:00 Michael Schwendt :
> %exclude is global per spec file, or else you would need to %exclude
> a file in _all_ subpackages (in the case when deleting it in %install
> would be more convenient anyway). That would cause some pain in some
> packages.
Is that really true? But
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:32:04 +0100, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2015-01-10 13:04 GMT+01:00 Michael Schwendt:
> > %exclude is global per spec file, or else you would need to %exclude
> > a file in _all_ subpackages (in the case when deleting it in %install
> > would be more convenient anyway). That wou
Hi,
I'm orphaning pympdtouchgui - while it may still work I've never
actually used it myself and I do not know of any other user of the
package.
Additionally it hasn't been touched by $upstream in almost four years.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
Hi folks! So I don't think we have anything particular to discuss at a
meeting tomorrow, thus according to the policy of not wasting people's
time with unnecessary meetings, I propose we cancel it. If anyone did
have something to discuss, please do reply to this mail!
We could possibly move blo
Hello,
People who have their names in the Fedora tcp_wrappers changelog added to CC
list..
Any comments about the below? Obviously aclexec feature would be useful for all
services using tcpwrappers/libwrap (ftp,telnet,tftp,ident,nfs, and many others),
and thus very nice to have.
Thanks,
-- P
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:16:38AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for "aclexec" in
> tcp_wrappers via a custom patch since 2006,
> so you can do this in /etc/hosts.allow or hosts.deny:
>
>
> What do people feel about that? I'd like to
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 09:29:08PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:16:38AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for "aclexec" in
> > tcp_wrappers via a custom patch since 2006,
> > so you can do this in /etc/host
Hi everyone!
I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
end-user, I'm fighting with the list of packages when I press TAB.
It's complicated, if I forget to install a specific package, dnf
wouldn't show it to me, yum do it [1].
I know that dnf is newer, and surely will impr
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Adrian Soliard
wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
> end-user, I'm fighting with the list of packages when I press TAB.
> It's complicated, if I forget to install a specific package, dnf
> wouldn't show it to
2015-01-11 20:42 GMT-03:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Adrian Soliard
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone!
>>I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
>> end-user, I'm fighting with the list of packages when I press TAB.
>> It's complicated, if I forget to ins
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:34:14PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> We virtualize most of our
> servers which ends up with even more weird problems of trying to get
> working.
Could you expand on these problems you have with virtualized systems?
I wrote a tool called virt-rescue which should
Hi,
> Often not the case in small business or third party hosted
> environments. Without remote ssh, box is unmanageable.
>
> Even if you want to do key-based authentication rather than password,
> you still need to use password initially to get the key onto the
> remote box.
Just curio
15 matches
Mail list logo
