rawhide report: 20141103 changes

2014-11-03 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Nov 3 05:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [alienarena] a

F-21 Branched report: 20141103 changes

2014-11-03 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Nov 3 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-03 Thread Miloslav Trmač
- Original Message - > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:59:30PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467 > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > My intuition is that if an application needs _everything_ in /usr to > >

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-03 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Hello, - Original Message - > On Fri, 31.10.14 10:04, Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) wrote: > > > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467 > > > > Thoughts? > > I very much agree with this, but I'd really prefer if we'd list what > is allowed rather than just decl

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2014-11-03 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 3 packages were orphaned gdesklets [master] was orphaned by luya An interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-03 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Miloslav Trmač said: > What is the use case for such a blanket requirement? fpc/467 lists the virt > thing I so far disagree with, and other uses cases in there actually need > much less than all of /usr. Some packagers think they are being "clever" sometimes by making RPM-in

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-03 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:58:21AM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > - Original Message - > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:59:30PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > > > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467 > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > >

[Test-Announce] 2014-11-03 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA Meeting

2014-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
NOTE: we've just started the meeting, I only just realized I never hit sent on this email :( Sending it now for any late joiners, and Posterity. # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2014-11-03 # Time: ** 16:00 UTC ** (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedor

Re: Proposal for integration tests infrastructure

2014-11-03 Thread Honza Horak
On 10/28/2014 08:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 10/22/2014 09:43 PM, Honza Horak wrote: Fedora lacks integration testing (unit testing done during build is not enough). Taskotron will be able to fill some gaps in the future, so maintainers will be able to set-up various tasks after their componen

Re: Proposal for integration tests infrastructure

2014-11-03 Thread Honza Horak
On 10/24/2014 07:18 PM, John Dulaney wrote: How to deliver tests? a/ just use them directly from git (we need to keep some metadata for dependencies anyway) b/ package them as RPMs (we can keep metadata there; e.g. Taskotron will run only tests that have "Provides: ci-tests(mariadb)" after mariad

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-03 Thread Miloslav Trmač
- Original Message - > I can't speak for virtme, but supermin won't read new files that are > added by the administrator. It only looks at files that it knows > (from RPM metadata) are part of RPM-installed packages, and only a > fixed list of Fedora-packaged RPMs are consulted, not random

Re: Proposal for integration tests infrastructure

2014-11-03 Thread Honza Horak
On 10/28/2014 08:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: Note that any or all of the above may be appropriate, depending on the exact nature of the specific tests. For example, there are already some public Beaker installer tests at https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa/fedora-beaker-tests for execution on http://

Re: Proposal for integration tests infrastructure

2014-11-03 Thread Tim Flink
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:22:27 +0100 Honza Horak wrote: > On 10/28/2014 08:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Note that any or all of the above may be appropriate, depending on > > the exact nature of the specific tests. > > > > For example, there are already some public Beaker installer tests at > > h

Planned Outage: System reboots - 2014-11-05 22:00 UTC

2014-11-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage: System reboots - 2014-11-05 22:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2014-11-05 22:00 UTC, which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2014-11-05 22:00

Re: Proposal for integration tests infrastructure

2014-11-03 Thread Tim Flink
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:08:40 +0100 Honza Horak wrote: > On 10/28/2014 08:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 10/22/2014 09:43 PM, Honza Horak wrote: > >> Fedora lacks integration testing (unit testing done during build > >> is not enough). Taskotron will be able to fill some gaps in the > >> future

[Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd

2014-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. We now have updates for fedup and systemd that approach the shutdown-after-15-minutes bug (that's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159292 ) from different angles. We would like to get these marked as stable ASAP (assuming we find no problems with them, of course). These are

dnf wants to install new packages when one tries to remove some

2014-11-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi Just a heads up since I have run into this twice in a span of few days. It probably makes sense from the satsolver perspective but I found it pretty surprising behavior. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154202 Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd

2014-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 11:12 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks. We now have updates for fedup and systemd that approach the > shutdown-after-15-minutes bug (that's > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159292 ) from different > angles. We would like to get these marked as stable ASA

Re: dnf wants to install new packages when one tries to remove some

2014-11-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Just a heads up since I have run into this twice in a span of few days. It > probably makes sense from the satsolver perspective but I found it pretty > surprising behavior. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154202 I j

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467 > > Thoughts? IMHO, this is just common sense (it follows from: 1. that %config files already have no business being in /usr, 2. that any file NOT marked %config comes from a Fedora package (and should NOT

Re: Suggested Freeze Policy change for Fedora 22+

2014-11-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I talked to several people over the last couple days about what we can > do to try to avoid the "hero testing" treadmill that we've been on > during every Freeze in recent memory (specifically that we're usually > fixing Blocker bugs until the day before the Go/No-Go meet

Re: Suggested Freeze Policy change for Fedora 22+

2014-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 11:17 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I talked to several people over the last couple days about what we can > do to try to avoid the "hero testing" treadmill that we've been on > during every Freeze in recent memory (specifically that we're usually > fixing Blocker bugs unt

Koji timeout

2014-11-03 Thread Andrea Musuruane
Hi, I'm trying to build pinta but it fails due to timeout on F20 and F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009471 It built fine for F19 and F21 though. And it builds fine using mock. I resubmitted the two failed builds