On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> . And the "bandwidth saving" is still badly
>> overshadowed by the necessary repodata bandwith from almost every run
>> of "reposync" in the model you've just described
Hi
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Even then, though still means up to 60 MB * 15/month,
>
Earlier you mentioned 50 MB. Now you claim 60 MB. Can you show where
these figures are from?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Am 19.10.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
#!/usr/bin/bash
basearch=`uname -i`
releasever=`rpm -q --qf "%{version}\n" fedora-release`
for g in `ls -1b /var/cache/yum`
do
if [ -d /var/cache/yum/$g/packages ]
then
echo "/var/cac
Compose started at Sun Oct 19 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Ag
Compose started at Sun Oct 19 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
Hi all,
this may be the wrong list to ask to.
If so, please let me know which list is more appropriate.
I would like the latest stable version of Sheepdog software to be
present in fedora repository.
Sheepdog is a distributed object storage system for volume and
container services and manages th
2014-10-19 15:20 GMT+02:00 Valerio Pachera :
> Hi all,
>
> this may be the wrong list to ask to.
> If so, please let me know which list is more appropriate.
>
Hi,
since sheepdog is already in Fedora Packages Collection, you should
have contacted David (fas: ke4qqq), its maintainer before. You cou
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this may be the wrong list to ask to.
> If so, please let me know which list is more appropriate.
>
> I would like the latest stable version of Sheepdog software to be
> present in fedora repository.
>
> Sheepdog is a distribut
I see comps' "multimedia" group still defaults to installing gstreamer-0.10
plugins (with gstreamer1 conditional). Any comments about switching this
the other way around?
Possible comps-f22.xml.in patch attached.
If I'd noticed earlier, I'd have advocated adjusting comps-f21 too, but I
figure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/19/2014 03:20 PM, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this may be the wrong list to ask to. If so, please let me know
> which list is more appropriate.
>
> I would like the latest stable version of Sheepdog software to be
> present in fedora
On 10/19/2014 05:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I see comps' "multimedia" group still defaults to installing gstreamer-0.10
> plugins (with gstreamer1 conditional). Any comments about switching this
> the other way around?
>
> Possible comps-f22.xml.in patch attached.
>
> If I'd noticed earlier, I
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Even then, though still means up to 60 MB * 15/month,
>
>
> Earlier you mentioned 50 MB. Now you claim 60 MB. Can you show where these
> figures are from?
>
> Rahul
It
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.10.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> #!/usr/bin/bash
>>> basearch=`uname -i`
>>> releasever=`rpm -q --qf "%{version}\n" fedora-release`
>>> for g in `ls -1
vmpk 0.6.0 license changed from 'GPLv3+ and (LGPLv2 with exception or
GPLv3)' to 'GPLv3+'.
Cheers
-robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It's a rough figure, from
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/20/Everything/x86_64/os/repodata/
>
That doesn't seem to be the right way to look at the numbers. In a local
system, there are two different repositories enable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/12/2014 12:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:41:32 -0500 Mukundan Ragavan
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like some clarification from folks here regarding
>>
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:52:00 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It's a rough figure, from
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/20/Everything/x86_64/os/repodata/
> (a useful local mirror). Since the number of packages there changes
> day to day, but are likely to increase monotonically over t
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-10-20
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We have a meeting slot tomorrow / today, so let's get together. 21 Beta
is now in freeze, so we shoul
I am in the wheel group, and if I type:
nethogs
then I can install nethogs without any additional authorization. This is
on a freshly booted machine where sudo has not been run.
Should this be marked as a blocker?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153005
--
James Patterson
james
19 matches
Mail list logo
