Anybody can tell when syslinux-6.03 will be available in F21?
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2014-October/123202.html)
My reason for this request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141496
Thanks.
Kind regards
--
Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
Kernel-3.17.0-300.fc2
> launchy (maintained by: lzap)
> launchy-2.5-11.fc22.src requires boost-devel = 1.55.0-4.fc22
I don't understand why this package is included in the list. I still
maintain it, it builds fine. Can someone explain? I am short of
caffeine.
LZ
--
Later,
Lukas #lzap Zapletal
--
- Original Message -
> From: "Lukas Zapletal"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:05:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Orphan packages in rawhide
>
> > launchy (maintained by: lzap)
> > launchy-2.5-11.fc22.src requires boost-devel = 1.55.0-4.fc22
>
> It depends on boost which in turn depends on mpich which was orphaned.
Oh, I've forced out this option from my mind. Interesting.
Well, launchy is not much maintained software and not in wide use. I am
fine with orphaning it.
Thanks
--
Later,
Lukas #lzap Zapletal
--
devel mailing list
deve
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Feed-Find
from: Approved to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Feed-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
pe
- Original Message -
> From: "Lukas Zapletal"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:30:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Orphan packages in rawhide
>
> > It depends on boost which in turn depends on mpich which was orphaned.
>
> Oh, I've forced ou
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 08:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 06.10.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Florian Festi:
>>>
>>> The way of getting around all this unnecessary computation is
>>> establishing trust via the deltarpm itself and giving up the idea of
>
* Lukas Zapletal [08/10/2014 10:05] :
>
> > launchy (maintained by: lzap)
> > launchy-2.5-11.fc22.src requires boost-devel = 1.55.0-4.fc22
>
> I don't understand why this package is included in the list. I still
> maintain it, it builds fine. Can someone explain? I am short of
> ca
On 08/10/14 10:41, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> The list of ttys you see along the bottom is from tmux [0]. From that screen
> if you were to hit `ctrl-b 2` it would switch to the pane labelled 'shell' at
> the bottom of the screen.
Uh-hah, thankyou.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
Compose started at Wed Oct 8 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
Compose started at Wed Oct 8 05:15:10 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so
- Original Message -
> On 6 October 2014 17:28, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> > usage/requirement as well. Bringing the benefits of supporting dash to…
> >> > the satisfaction of pedantically using the POSIX /bin/sh path as
> >> > frequently as possible?
> >>
On 10/07/2014 11:04 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Gene Czarcinski
mailto:gczarcin...@gmail.com>> wrote:
However, there are some things that could be done to make it
easier for those of us who want to make it easier to install
Fedora onto a btrfs filesys
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote on 07.10.2014 21:15:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> [...]
I think the point is somewhat valid though. To just keep repeating the
mantra 'its not ready' is not going to make it any more
On 10/08/2014 02:28 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 08.10.2014 07:52:
Josh Boyer wrote on 07.10.2014 21:15:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
[…]
I think the point is somewhat valid though. To just keep repeating the
mantra 'its not ready' is not going
On 08.10.2014 14:50, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
> wrote:
>> Josh Boyer wrote on 07.10.2014 21:15:
>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> [...]
>> http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel-source/tree/patches.suse/btrfs--add-allow_un
On 8 October 2014 00:36, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:27:52 -0600
> Jerry James wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Jerry James
> > wrote:
> > > I posted about this 5 days ago on ppc list [1], but have had no
> > > response. I tried to get some attention on #fedora-ppc tod
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-10-08 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:36:39AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> #topic Fedora 22 scheduling strategy (and beyond)
> .fesco 1349
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1349
We spent a lot of time on this at the last meeting, and then I suggested we
continue in the ticket and then... that didn't happ
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:36:39AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> #topic Fedora 22 scheduling strategy (and beyond)
>> .fesco 1349
>> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1349
>
> We spent a lot of time on this at the last meeting, and then I
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:46:55AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I was going to point that out in the meeting as well. I'd rather
> strike it entirely because we clearly haven't put more thought into it
> so we aren't going to be productive in a live setting.
Agreed.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Proj
My thought is this whole topic was started as a result of the recent Bash
vulnerability which has since been corrected. Not bad for a product that
has been around for decades. Nothing against Dash, but changing a default
isn't something that should be done each time the wind changes direction.
A
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:2 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
On 10/03/2014 08:24 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a proposal that would change how dependencies are defined in copr:
> >
> > Problem:
> > Currently, copr allows to add a link to an arbitrary repo URL that is
> > available for installing depende
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-10-08)
===
Meeting started by jwb at 17:00:07 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-10-08/fesco.2014-10-08-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
Greetings.
This F21 change:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
has brought us 'weak dependencies', namely:
Recommends, Suggests, Supplements and Enhances
Rpm in f21 and rawhide sees these in spec files and builds fine with
them. createrepo in those branches also exports this int
2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> Greetings.
>
> This F21 change:
> http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
>
> has brought us 'weak dependencies', namely:
>
> Recommends, Suggests, Supplements and Enhances
>
> Rpm in f21 and rawhide sees these in spec files and builds fine with
>
Hi
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> * Bash scripts should rely on bash explicitly (jwb, 17:34:13)
> * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1352 (jwb, 17:34:14)
> * AGREED: Ask Rahul to work with upstreams to resolve this issue
> rather than patching it downstr
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:18:22PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Well, what I do with upstreams as an individual is not within FESCo's
> purview and this message also appears to assume that downstream patches
> would be needed. If no coordination can be done within Fedora, that is
> effectively a
Hi
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> See the transcript. I don't think there's any problem with coordinating it
> in Fedora in some way, but we don't want that to be a way that puts a
> burden
> on Fedora packagers unless they're interested. If you're interested in
> havin
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:29:32PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Wiki page is going to be a pain to maintain manually. How about using
> bugzilla to track the issues? Using proven packager rights to fix the
> issues? I will also volunteer to send any patches upstream.
Well, specifically, we di
Hi
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Well, specifically, we didn't want to use bugzilla. I'm not sure I'm
> speaking for everyone, but I think that's because it's not really the best
> place for minor upstream issues.
>
Using a wiki to track bugs is obviously not ideal.
Hi all --
Does anybody know how Iain's doing? I needed some of his packages
updated a few weeks ago and had no response, so opened bugs to request
responses.[0] In the meantime, other folks have stepped in to update
these packages, so the immediate problem is solved (albeit after many
weeks)
On 10/09/2014 06:29 AM, Ruediger Landmann wrote:
Hi all --
Does anybody know how Iain's doing?
No. Last time, I've heard something from him, he mentioned to have
switched jobs, to have moved and not to have much time for Fedora
anymore and to welcome co-maintainers.
I needed some of his pac
All,
Over the past month, I have tried contacting Keiran Smith (affix) in
regards to nagios with no success [1].
Is anyone aware to his present status in regards to the Fedora Project
or possibly have an alternative method to reach him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145830
Th
On 8.10.2014 23:04, Haïkel wrote:
2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
Greetings.
This F21 change:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
has brought us 'weak dependencies', namely:
Recommends, Suggests, Supplements and Enhances
Rpm in f21 and rawhide sees these in spec files an
36 matches
Mail list logo
