Broken deps for i386
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[askbot]
askbot-0.7.48-13.fc21.noa
Compose started at Mon Sep 22 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> (Sorry for top-posting)
>
> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming shortly from the
> Flock Planning Committee. Please disregard this thread and await that poll.
>
>
To make it a bit more complicate: could we have more specifi
Hi all,
Here we are, final 3.14.0 this week! Same deal as with the 3.13.92
update last week: use 'fedpkg build --target f21-gnome' for builds or
alternatively list your builds in the spreadsheet and I'll pick them up
for the megaupdate.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJ
Am 22.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
>>> > Then file a bug report against rsyslog and provide a patch which fixes
>>> > the default log filtering in Fedora to your expectation but leave
>>> > systemd out of it.
>> wow - in any other case the systemd developers saying that
>> the
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
>> On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> (Sorry for top-posting)
>>
>> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming shortly from the
>> Flock Planning Committee. Please disregard this thread and await that poll
- Original Message -
> I going to update jsoncpp to the latest github commit in rawhide. This is an
> ABI
> break with no soname change.
That’s rather risky, any of the users could break without any RPM dependency
failure. Could you at least file a bug against every package using jsoncp
On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 19:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> * Anything else?
The dual boot release criteria? Would be nice to get those finalized as
soon as possible.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 19:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> * Anything else?
>
> The dual boot release criteria? Would be nice to get those finalized as
> soon as possible.
Hmm?
I haven't seen anything on devel list about that.
josh
-
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
8 packages were orphaned
flickrnet [f21, f19, master, f20] was orphaned by palango
.NET library to interact with the Flickr API
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb
On 09/22/2014 12:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i suggest you get rid of that arrogance and some other developers
too because it's the reason for the subject and proves that you
*do not* care about users as long you have not the same opinion
you are the one demanding a friendly tone from me, well
Am 22.09.2014 um 15:55 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On 09/22/2014 12:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i suggest you get rid of that arrogance and some other developers
>> too because it's the reason for the subject and proves that you
>> *do not* care about users as long you have not the same o
(stripping systemd-devel)
- Original Message -
> Am 22.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> > This is simply untrue as "journalctl -o export" will show you.
>
> where is it in the message?
> the process is "systemd"
>
> how to distinct between user sessions and systemn boot?
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:04:52 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Matthias Runge
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>
> >> (Sorry for top-posting)
> >>
> >> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming sho
Am 22.09.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
> (stripping systemd-devel)
>
> - Original Message -
>> Am 22.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
>>> This is simply untrue as "journalctl -o export" will show you.
>>
>> where is it in the message?
>> the process is "systemd"
>>
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 16:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> no you refuse to understand that *nobody* wants to split
> out *all* systemd logs because just the excessive *user
> session* logging and that this messages should not exist
> at all in a non-debugging environment
IIUC , this messages doesn
Am 22.09.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 16:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> no you refuse to understand that *nobody* wants to split
>> out *all* systemd logs because just the excessive *user
>> session* logging and that this messages should not exist
>> at all in a
Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
airports at the *targeted* period.
If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
@+
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 17:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 22.09.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 16:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> no you refuse to understand that *nobody* wants to split
> >> out *all* systemd logs because just the excessive *user
> >> sess
Am 22.09.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 17:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 22.09.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
>>> On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 16:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
no you refuse to understand that *nobody* wants to split
out *all* syste
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I missed the memo about it not being a fatal error now (rpmlint still
> tells it
> is an error), but just in case, before attempting to enforce it a
> package review,
Note that not *all* RPATHs are bad. In general, those that match these nee
On 09/22/2014 02:25 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
(stripping systemd-devel)
- Original Message -
>Am 22.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> >This is simply untrue as "journalctl -o export" will show you.
>
>where is it in the message?
>the process is "systemd"
>
>how to dis
- Original Message -
> For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
> use "journalctl -p 3" or "journalctl -b -p 3" if you want it only from
> last boot ( add boot id if you want to from specific boot ) or you add
> "journalctl -b -p 3 -u httpd.service" if you wan
Am 22.09.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
> - Original Message -
>> For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
>> use "journalctl -p 3" or "journalctl -b -p 3" if you want it only from
>> last boot ( add boot id if you want to from specific boot ) or you ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142195
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-POE-1.356-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-POE-1.356-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
> For the journal you always keep all log history in it's original
> state
On low-bandwidth systems, like laptops or diskless nodes, it's a
performance hit to generate the log entry in the first place. It's
really important to be able to configure the system to *generate* a
minimal amount of com
Sébastien Willmann wrote:
> I going to update jsoncpp to the latest github commit in rawhide. This is
> an ABI break with no soname change.
Why is there no soname change? (ie, there probably should be)
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Please avoid cross-posting in the middle of a thread without contextualization.
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 09/22/2014 04:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
>use "journalctl -p 3" or "journalctl -b -p 3" if you want it only from
>last boot ( add boot id if you want to from specific boot ) or you add
>"journalctl -b -p 3 -u httpd.ser
Am 22.09.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
>
> On 09/22/2014 04:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> >For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
>>> >use "journalctl -p 3" or "journalctl -b -p 3" if you want it only from
>>> >last boot ( add boot id if you want
Am 22.09.2014 um 19:51 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 22.09.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
>>
>> On 09/22/2014 04:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
> use "journalctl -p 3" or "journalctl -b -p 3" if you want it
On 09/22/2014 04:53 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
For the journal you always keep all log history in it's original
state
On low-bandwidth systems, like laptops or diskless nodes, it's a
performance hit to generate the log entry in the first place. It's
really important to be able to configure the syst
On 09/22/2014 06:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
# Log systemd-logind to /var/log/secure
:programname, isequal, "systemd-logind" -/var/log/secure
:programname, isequal, "systemd-logind" stop
:msg, contains, "Starting Session" stop
:msg, contains, "Started Session" stop
:msg, contains, "S
Am 22.09.2014 um 21:00 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On 09/22/2014 06:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> # Log systemd-logind to /var/log/secure
>> :programname, isequal, "systemd-logind" -/var/log/secure
>> :programname, isequal, "systemd-logind" stop
>> :msg, contains, "Starting Sessi
Am 22.09.2014 um 21:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 22.09.2014 um 21:00 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
>> On 09/22/2014 06:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> # Log systemd-logind to /var/log/secure
>>> :programname, isequal, "systemd-logind" -/var/log/secure
>>> :programname, isequal, "sys
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (14:00 London, 15:00 Brno, 9:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo) in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Recommendation for running Koschei for all Fedora packages
* Follow-up: language specific mirrors for Fedora Playground compliant packages
* Follow-up: SCLs, building a
Hey all,
The Fedora 21 Virt Test Day is this coming Thu Sep 25. Check out the test day
landing page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2014-09-25_Virtualization
If you're interested in trying out some new virt functionality, there's step
by step instructions for:
* Q35 Chipset
* Import AA
Seriously, both of you: this back and forth (and particularly the personal
squabbling!) do not help us with Fedora development, which is what this list
is for. If there's a problem somewhere here which we can address, let's talk
about technical problems and solutions. Or if there are upstream issue
On 22/09/14 17:18, Haïkel wrote:
> Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
> airports at the *targeted* period.
> If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
> to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
>
A brief look revealed, a trip e.g. to Cap
xorg-x11-drv-sis seems to have disappeared. Did that happen on purpose? It
still exists as a selelection in Bugzilla. Xorg is looking for sis module but
cannot find it. Gfxchip here is Z7/Z9 (XG20 core). Is it now supposed to be
using some other (not installed) driver? Before today's upgrade, X sti
- Original Message -
> From: "Felix Miata"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 September, 2014 4:50:46 PM
> Subject: F21/F22: xorg-x11-drv: which for SiS?
>
> xorg-x11-drv-sis seems to have disappeared. Did that happen on purpose? It
> still exists as a selelection i
41 matches
Mail list logo