Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > I missed the memo about it not being a fatal error now (rpmlint still > tells it > is an error), but just in case, before attempting to enforce it a > package review,
Note that not *all* RPATHs are bad. In general, those that match these need further scrutiny: /usr/lib /usr/lib64 /builddir/* In, particular, these are probably OK: /usr/bin/apper: RUNPATH=/usr/lib64/apper /usr/bin/catman: RPATH=/usr/lib64/man-db /usr/bin/pactl: RPATH=/usr/lib64/pulseaudio /usr/bin/profiles: RPATH=/usr/lib64/samba /usr/sbin/sssd: RPATH=/usr/lib64/sssd >BTW, The package I am reviewing has this >/usr/bin/julia-debug: RUNPATH=$ORIGIN/../lib64/julia:$ORIGIN/../lib64 Offhand, looks like the first part is ok, the second not. -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
