On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:52 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > >
>> > > - Original Message -
>> > > > Good
On Friday 05 September 2014 23:57:46 Adam Williamson wrote:
> I like GNOME Disks, it's a great handy toolbox for doing
> simple manipulation of drives, but I'm not sure it quite fits the same
> mental box as blivet-gui would, for me.
So, to extend the theoretical POV the way to go may have been:
On 09/01/2014 12:40 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> I'm running point on the 3.13.91 builds and will submit it as a single
> megaupdate in Bodhi later this week.
The megaupdate is out now and available in updates-testing. I'd
appreciate testing and feedback at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
Broken deps for i386
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686 requires libaudclient
Compose started at Sat Sep 6 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:35:45PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> 2014-09-05 17:08 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
> > release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we could improve
> > the
> > current workflo
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:12:49PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:08:39PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
> > release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 07:52:52AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 05:08 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> >* packager requests new branch in pkgdb (2 clicks)
> > => requests added to the scm admin queue
> >* cvsadmin checks the request/package (check if package exists in the RHE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:34:57 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> we (the Copr team) would like to allow uploading of source RPM to
> Copr. It seems that best way is to utilize dist-git [1]. Then Copr
> will fetch sources and spec file from dist-git a
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:34:57 +0200
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> we (the Copr team) would like to allow uploading of source RPM to
>> Copr. It seems that best way is to utilize dist-g
Hi
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Huh? What makes one legally not eligible to contribute? Just not
> signing the fpca? How is that different from someone that submits a
> patch via bugzilla / mail / whatever?
> I don't think people check whether those patch submitters have si
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 23:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:03 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 05.09.14 11:52, Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:0
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> Huh? What makes one legally not eligible to contribute? Just not
>> signing the fpca? How is that different from someone that submits a
>> patch via bugzilla / mail / whatever?
>
Hi
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
> Well the FPCA seem to talk about this if someone that didn't sign it
> sent you a patch all he/she has to do is to provide it under an
> "acceptable license".
>
Yes but we artificially make it seem like FPCA is a requirement even when
it i
On Sep 5, 2014 5:05 AM, "Vratislav Podzimek" wrote:
>
> Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
> introduce you the next generation tool for storage management -- the
> **blivet-gui** tool [1]_. It is a GUI tool based on the blivet python
> library (originally Anaconda's
On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 12:47 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > I can believe it'd be hard work, but I think you overstate the case by a
> > long way when you say it'd be impossible. It may be finicky work, but it
> > seems unlikely that it'd be easier to write an entirely new partitioning
> > app with a
I tried to retire the old virt-v2v package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/virt-v2v
However I likely only "half-retired" it because although I'm a package
administrator, I'm not the owner, or something like that. In any case
I'm coordinating with the package owner and we will have
Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
"systemd-readahead", a misguided attempt to optimize the boot process.
Did we agree to this when we adopted systemd as an init replacement?
I don't remember init including all thi
Am 06.09.2014 um 23:18 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
> machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
> "systemd-readahead", a misguided attempt to optimize the boot process.
> Did we agree to this when we adopted systemd as an
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:35:10AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> /tmp has nothing to do with systemd
The tmp-on-tmp misfeature is to do with systemd.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.
The systemd sysvinit replacement talked about in Fedora 14/15 was not
the init system + other bogus features that is talked about today.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
v
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:31:45AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 16:11:37 +0100,
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >Hi,
> >[1]
> >since Fedora have some responsibility, unfortunately I think the group
> >have some valid reasons , systemd should be the replacement of
> >sysvinit ,
On Sáb, 2014-09-06 at 22:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:31:45AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 16:11:37 +0100,
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >[1]
> > >since Fedora have some responsibility, unfortunately I think the group
> > >h
Hi
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
> package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you can forever more push
> any old stuff you want into Fedora, without going back and consulting
> with the communi
HI
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:35:10AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > /tmp has nothing to do with systemd
>
> The tmp-on-tmp misfeature is to do with systemd.
>
How? systemd works fine without it. Many distributions have switched to
On 09/06/2014 02:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
"systemd-readahead", a misguided attempt to optimize the boot process.
Did we agree to this when we adopted systemd as an init r
On 09/06/2014 03:09 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 07:52:52AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/05/2014 05:08 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
* cvsadmin approves the creation of the new branch in pkgdb
=> branch creation broadcasted on fedmsg
* git adjusted automat
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:18:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
> machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
> "systemd-readahead", a misguided attempt to optimize the boot process.
> Did we agree to this when we a
Hi,
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
I mean is that page current:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Current_status ?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
d
Takanori Matsuura (fas: tmatssu) cant be reached for a long time. There are no
reply on email,
in bugreport [1], there are no koji builds [2], even more, from the previous
message, Jiro Matsuzawa
tell he contact him personaly (a week ago) nut there were no actions.
At all mentioned above, I re
30 matches
Mail list logo
